Global Consciousness Experiments (GCEs) and Crop Circles

To get the most out of Evolver, create your profile now!
<< back to group Crop Circles
February 3, 2010

I'm going to be participating, and I invite all of you to also check this out and see if you'd like to add your energy to the experiments:

http://asgce.wordpress.com/author/brightgarlick/

Comments

thanks

Thanks for the link.

I invite you to join the discussion

I have just posted the following at AS: Global Consciousness Experiments, and invite you to join the group and the conversation if you have an interest in the topic of discussion:

Extreme Synchronicity as Evidence for Non-Human-Made Crop Circles

I'd like to talk to other researchers who have found what they consider solid evidence, as irrefutable as evidence can possibly be, that there is a genuine non-manmade crop circle phenomenon.  For me, synchronicity is one of the top indicators.  I've described in detail many of the synchronicities I've experienced with the circlemakers for the past 15 years on my website, Inter-Intelligence Communications, and in the interest of saving space I won't rehash those accounts here.  But I highly recommend clicking on the tag "US crop circles" in order to quickly get a list of articles describing these accounts, because many of these articles (and particularly those involving the Inman, Kansas crop circle of 1995 and the North Dakota crop circles of 2000) describe how the circlemakers were in apparent telepathic contact with me, and reinforced this perception with additional evidence over time.  I've considered whether some of what I consider to be telepathy could be further explicated using the holographic theory of everything (TOE) which Michael Talbot does a great job of exploring in his book The Holographic Universe.

Since this group is so small, however, I'm not sure what kind of discussion we can get going...but I hope that over time we can get more participants.  Among those who believe that there are two phenomena - the "genuine" and the manmade - not all have experienced firsthand what they consider evidence, which is what I'm suggesting for this discussion.  At this point the evidence, at least that which I'm wont to discuss, is not so much scientific as it is anecdotal - but I trust the evidence nonetheless, one reason being its strength, and another being that, while I inform my perceptions of reality with scientific findings, I'm not a disciple of science; science does not define reality.  With that in mind, the caveat to reproducing experimental results in the realm of the genuine crop circle phenomenon, I've found, is that just like with my interactions with BOLS, the circlemaking intelligence is elusive and seems to preferentially "surprise" me with confirmation of its reality.  Whether this is an indication of a true playfulness, which is an explanation I've instinctually leaned toward in the past, or simply a restriction of communication that we've yet to understand (perhaps a dimensional or time constraint), I don't know. 

As financial portfolios announce as their disclaimer:  "past performance is not a promise of future results," or something to that effect, I'm not averse to attempting to solicit more of the same confirmation of co-creation from the circlemakers.  However, depending on the results, such an effort exerted by a group rather than an individual may add new evidence leading to greater understanding of the nature of the circlemaking intelligence.  Is it telepathic?  Holographic?  An extension of ourselves?  All of the above?  None of the above?  Is finding the answer necessary to our evolution, or is the evidence itself enough to encourage our evolution to a higher state of being (something which I feel is an intended or consequential result of these interactions)?  These are questions that the most irrefutable evidence can spur us to consider.  Perhaps the synapses sparked in the process are preparing our consciousness for even greater disclosures, and more direct meetings with the circlemakers....perhaps we will reach a state at which time the circlemakers can more directly interface with us, whether by simple "interspecies" choice or by some other motivation unknown to us at this time...?

Stace Tussel