What should our Intention be towards animals in a Community?

<< back to group Intentional Communities
July 28, 2009

After watching these documentaries:

"Earthlings"
http://www.raw-wisdom.com/earthlings

"Peaceable Kingdom"
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1302229573448724495

what do you think about animal enslavement being incorporated into intentional communities?

Isn't it less sustainable, less compassionate, less healthy, less sanitary?
Why is veganic thought of as "extreme" when these facts are considered?

Comments

on enslavement

I only watched part of that doc. it's over-whelming. I'll take it in small doses.

I personally have not spent any time at communities that raise animals "for meat". As soon as I see that I know I can't take part in it. I have been to places that keep a couple chickens in a coup and depending on how much space and playtime they get it hasn't bothered me too much. I heard of this dairy farm in fairfield Iowa that pets and plays music for non-crowded cows...I imagine it takes a lot to truly respect and care for these animals. It might be worth visiting this place and "talking" with some cows to see if they feel happy with the situation.

One of the girls wwoofing with me at the Folk Art Guild near Rochester was telling me about how the family pig or chicken on her farm was like a pet and that it was hard to kill and eat them. Somehow it is easier to do when we disassociate the meat/animal from the being/animal...
I remember the last time I ate meat and how it was that point where I could no longer do this disassociation...I could feel the nervousness of the chicken and how it felt in that life.
We are what we eat right? It struck me that maybe people feel enslaved in their lives becuase they eat animals that are enslaved, given little space, treated poorly at best and like meat-objects at worst.
I say if you "do" eat meat then visiting a community that "grows animals for meat" could potentially be a good eye opener as far as learning not to disassociate the animals from the meat.

Another lesson I learned at the Folk Art Guild is that plants can also be enslaved much like animals....over-crowded and over picked. We had under an acre of sugar peas and picked their fruits every 2-3 days yeilding 350 lbs a week mostly for the purpose of profiting at the farmer's market. These peas were organic wholesome peas....but were they happy being "milked" so harshly without any of their "babies" being able to become full plants? They started making uglier peas knowing that we we drop them on the ground and not sell them! Do not under-estimate plant consciousness.
Likewise the wwoofers on this farm were over-worked just like their plant partners. My hands were tired of picking the tired pea plant....the peas and my hands were essentially one entity. The mind-sets, intentions and ideals of a place cross the vegetable, animal, human, machine and raw resource boundaries and effect everything!

Mother Nature has given us more than enough reasons to go vegan

Although I dont think you were promoting the rationalization of killing and enslaving animals, a couple things you brought up we should be more analytical about, because some people use these concepts to further the status-quo of misinformation on this topic.
Concerning the idealized "dream" farm where animals are treated much better, there are still problems. There may be such farms out there, but they are very few in number, most animals are raised on factory farms. However we should be cautious when admiring slavery by degree, enslavement is enslavement, however "nice" the slave master is. And as long as we hold the judgment that animal slavery and exploitation is okay, as long as it's done "well", then the industry will continue on, perhaps with deceptive labeling like "free-range" or "naturally grown". [See "Animal Rights vs. Animal Welfare" on http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/video/]

Drinking cows milk (and eating milk products) is far from natural, humans are the only species to ingest the milk of another species, and numerous health studies show humans are paying for that dietary choice with their health in various ways. The same goes for eating meat of course, humans are healthiest as herbivores, as scientific findings like The China Study, and many others show beyond a doubt. Just today there was an article published on another study linking meat and dairy consumption with cancer:
http://www.care2.com/greenliving/red-meat-dairy-linked-to-cancer.html

I'd also caution on comparing the suffering of plants with animals. Many propagate this perspective, not because they are vegan and care about plants too, but because they are not vegans and by suggesting that eating plants is just as bad as eating animals, they are trying to justify their meat eating because "you have to eat something" and if "everything you eat is harmful", then we just have to accept that killing for food as "part of human life". Its absurd to believe plants suffer and feel pain like animals do, they just don't. Yes they may respond to good music and good thoughts but that doesn't mean that they are comparable to animals with a central nervous system. Plants are meant to be our food, do you really think apples or coconuts falling off trees or spinach or kale, or macadamia nuts, etc. have another purpose on earth?

I hope you'll finish watching Earthlings, along with the other excellent presentations explaining the reasoning behind animal rights here:
http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/video/

The more I learn about human health and ecology the more crazy I find the mass-murder of animals to be. Why are so many so adamant about causing so much unneeded suffering and violence towards defenseless animals, just so they can eat their flesh and eggs, and drink their milk, all of which are unhealthy for them? People are killing animals so they can eat them, so they can get cancer and other ailments that kills them too. If that's not crazy I don't know what is. Why is nonviolence (and science) so hard to embrace?
Peace

It wasn't my intention...

to promote meat eating, and I know that the "plant side" of it is less destructive in general{although the pesticide and genetic modification is not natural at all!!} I also know that it takes a lot of plants to "grow" one cow which is not sensative to plants in the slightest. What is it? An acre per cow?

Meat farming is destructive on a greater scale, a far greater scale than plant farming.

Point taken that I need to be cautious when talking about it. I see how that argument could be used to justify eating meat! .....
it isnt every place/person I bring it up to, but I think it is okay to bring it up here since this group appears to be filled with the "vegetable eaters"
What I am trying to get at is that there is an underlying mind-set of general disascociation between our food and where it comes from and also that "enslavement" is mind-set as well applied to animal/plant/rescource. I didn't expect to feel the way I did on that farm towards the vegetables...but I felt it...I felt empathy for vegetables...If I'm going to share this with anyone it's going to be here.

"Its absurd to believe plants suffer and feel pain like animals do, they just don't. Yes they may respond to good music and good thoughts but that doesn't mean that they are comparable to animals with a central nervous system. Plants are meant to be our food, do you really think apples or coconuts falling off trees or spinach or kale, or macadamia nuts, etc. have another purpose on earth?"
This is mostly true... plant life does exist for our food I think that we are meant to eat the fruits and some leaves without the cycle of "plant rows-tare up plants roots and all-kill all weeds-modify genes-plant more seeds." We are generally taking advantage of the fact that plants are so giving by farming them this way.
I think the mindset behind this and the mindset that enslaves and slaughters animals is the same just on different scales.

I don't think the best way to make people become vegan is to guilt-trip them or tell them they are bad human beings....lifting the veil of Disassociation is a step which I think the video is aiming to do and cooking, raising, making good vegan food is another.
I'm not sure if you have any friends that eat meat....If you don't mind to let's go deeper into this with a question:

"What are some good ways to get a meat eater to try veganism?"

I found getting angry doesn't work at all! Neither does directly telling them what to do.....also many times it doesn't happen all at once but in these kinds of steps: 1. Meat eater trys some vegan food and likes it, cuts down on meat eating 2. Vegatarianism 3. Veganism
However, if you know good ways to convince people that go directly from mostly meat to entirely vegan I am really interested as my family is still mostly meat and it appears to be a long road in getting them to understand.

Perhaps the best way is to just live by example and promote respect toward animals and go to communities that match your intention in this.

This subject is both heated and tricky! Let's continue....

tolerance, non-judgementalism, peace

Factory farming, whether of (non-organic) vegetables of of animals sucks ever so mightily, and is one of the key factors which is presently threatening biodiversity on the planet, and even perhaps the survival of the human species.

Probably the 2nd leading major suckage is intolerance, judgementalism, hate, war, etc.

People who choose to include animal products and/or flesh in their diets deserve love, tolerance, non-judgementalism every bit as much as any other NON-MILITANT human ... those who would judge others & band together to form an "ism" which stands in judgement of others are "part of the problem" and not part of the solution !

In many parts of the world there are not the options which we who are able to sit at a computer and ruminate about what other people eat .. do enjoy.

Until YOU have lived in near starvation, and LIVED because some animal was milked, or their dung was used for fertilizer, or yes- perhaps they gave their life to sustain yours .. .until you have been there --- I put forth that you have no ground to stand upon from which to judge.

Every form of life comes into this world, lives, and dies.
Life gives to life, that life may continue.
YOU are directly or indirectly a mass murderer of plants.

Get over it .. with the holier than thou stuff.

It is terrible to see people who are claiming heights of spirituality ... then casting stones down from their lofty self-enthronement !

I personally eat mostly vegetarian, have many, many beloved vegan friends, and have a low tolerance for judgementalism, whether it be sexual (many of my vegan friends are also gay / lesbian) or racial, or ageist, or, or, or.

Not pointing any fingers here, but have noted in my professional practice as a an alternative healer that there are plenty of people who are of the militant vegan stripe who are not emotionally well-adjusted in their relations with the human species .. in these instances, their veganism is a pathological expression.

Peace, Love, Tolerance...


warm wishes,
david hartley 510.859.4050  
www.holistiq.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer

I'm intrigued..

by what you say about "isms" that could be a great topic to get into.
Do you have any stories{first-person experience} with groups that took "isms" too far?

unsound arguments

So I should have no judgment about unnecessary violence, because the principle of compassion is an "ism"? And yet it's okay for you to judge me for my beliefs that unnecessary violence is wrong?

I almost laughed when I read: "those who would judge others & band together to form an "ism" which stands in judgment of others are "part of the problem" and not part of the solution". Oh really? Would you say the same about the Abolitionists? Or the Suffragettes? Weren't they banding together in judgment of others? Of course they were, and what made them right, what made them part of the solution, was the principle they were speaking out for, freedom, and the behavior of others they were against, namely slavery and patriarchal oppression. The same goes for those speaking out against animal slavery, exploitation and abuse.

Those that are educating and speaking out against the unnecessary, unsustainable and unhealthy enslavement, torture and killing of animals are against speciesism (look it up if your unfamiliar with the term), an "ism" you obviously adhere to since you think being non-judgmental towards humans is much more important than considering the massive suffering of defenseless animals.

And bringing up the "mass-murdering of plants" seems to be a defensive mechanism that completely ignores what I already said about that in my last post, an extremely weak defense of meat-eating.

Also, those that defend meat-eating often bring up extreme examples, like someone starving on an island, to try and rationalize meat eating, another very weak argument. Is that the case for you? Are you starving and the only thing to eat is a dog in the street that you have to kill with your bear hands? Using arguments of hypothetical situations of which you have never been a part of, to defend the situation you currently are in, has no merit. I would hope this discussion could remain within the bounds of good logic and reasoning. Also meat-eating contributes to world-wide starvation because it uses much more grains, water, etc. (that could feed the hungry) to "produce" meat than the amount of food that is "created" in the form of animal flesh. See: http://www.goveg.com/worldhunger.asp

Additionally, to suggest that the "factory farming of plants" causes as much environmental destruction as the factory farming of animals is false, factory farming of animals is the #1 source of water pollution and a top emitter greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. Of course large mono-crop pesticide intensive agriculture is very destructive, that's why I, along with many others who can see the clear solution, promote small-scale veganic agriculture.

To finish, your remark about veganism being a pathological expression is again typical of those who cant defend their anti-veganism argument with any sound logic, reasoning or science, so they turn to the old standby of name-calling and slander, a very despicable, ignorant and childish pathology itself, revealing the human behavior of projection of one's own neurosis onto others; very ironic, and very stupid.

I suggest you watch Earthlings, peruse the goveg.com site beyond the above cited article, and view the animal rights presentations all linked to in my previous posts here, so you can have a more educated opinion.
Peace

I have to

intervene just for one moment here.
I created this group as a resource and I would very much like to keep it based in first-person experiences...like I said theory/philosophy is great but that it is even greater when based on examples of what you met with in life.
For example I described how I felt the last time I ate meat and picking peas on a farm.
Do you have stories about seeing slaughter, a friend in ill-health do to meat eating, how you became vegan and why or perhaps how you felt watching the "Earthlings" movie? You seem so passoinate I bet there are stories behind you're ideals!

Maybe I will re-emphasize that this group is experience based...I think it's really an important part of what I want to get at here.

peace

agreed

E, I agree that referring to first-person experiences is excellent. My passion for defending animals comes mostly from witnessing the realities on factory farms, animal experimentation laboratories, etc. through video; I've never seen this in person, I don't find it necessary to do so, though I'd be willing to go with someone who felt they needed to see it and smell it for themselves in order to give up eating animals, or to stop supporting animal experimentation, circuses, etc. What I have experienced first hand is the health benefits of a vegan diet, it's been my health insurance for years. (An example of that is all my acne clearing up once I stopped consuming dairy products). Also I have interacted with farm animals in more of a sanctuary setting, and that interaction has reinforced my understanding of their capacity to feel emotions like we do.
Concerning the following:

"... if you know good ways to convince people that go directly from mostly meat to entirely vegan I am really interested as my family is still mostly meat and it appears to be a long road in getting them to understand.
Perhaps the best way is to just live by example and promote respect toward animals and go to communities that match your intention in this."

I'd say sharing the facts, the video/camera footage, the science, is the best way to go. Most people are good people and have a functional conscience, but that conscience can' be activated if one remains ignorant of the reality of harm being done. Veganoutreach.org does a great job at producing educational pamphlets, I've given out those for years. And as for living by example and going to communities that match my intention to not be unnecessarily cruel to other creatures, I'm going to be doing exactly that, as you know. Also vegan potlucks are a great way to introduce others to the diet, along with free vegan cooking classes as well which are great, last night I went to one where we made pumpkin cheesecake, it was delicious!

I always try to keep in mind that it comes down to education and lack thereof, I ate eat meat and drank cow's milk for most of my life before I became educated and aware on the subject. What bothers me is when people get hostile towards information sharing and start slandering and saying ridiculous things in defense of meat-eating. When I was first given the information I just said thanks! I expect the same common courtesy (and common sense) of others, if someone wants to keep eating meat just because they like the way it tastes, then they shouldn't come up with some bogus arguments to cover up that underlying truth, it just makes them look worse. Denial is sometimes tough to get over...

May compassion, the scientific method and freedom one day become the status-quo!

SEP*AR*AT*ISM

When I look at the myriad of problems that our species is plagued with, I find that they ALL be traced to our disconnection with Nature. I believe that the concept of separation began when the first amoeba ate the second amoeba. The first amoeba actually realized (at some level of consciousness) that if it could do that to another being then there might be another being 'out there' that could do the same to it. Thus was the beggining of defense mechanisms and the ego. As life evolved, us conscious beings developed more and more sophisticated means of defending ourselves and insuring our survival. All of it was based on this concept of 'US and THEM' or 'ME and EVERYTHING ELSE' which evolved along with all of Life. Survival became a HUGE issue in the day to day prioritization of activities. So deeply into the human psyche has this CONCEPT of separation been embedded that it has become a great challenge to attempt to liberate humanity from it. Fortunately there are those among us who seem to be getting the picture that WE ARE ALL CONNECTED. What these few early risers are attuned to is that AS EACH OF US REALIGNS OUR SENSE OF PRIORITIES TO SUPPORT THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF EACH OTHER, WE, OURSELVES THRIVE. So of course it makes sense that we would want to stop exploiting animals as surely as it has been a boon for humanity to relinquish the tendency to exploit other human beings.
As wonderful as it would be to see intentional communities embracing a vegan ethic I can understand why even those who we would like to credit for being progressive in this day and age have yet to comply. Humanity has only just begun to awaken to the sensibility of the vegan ethic. If we sincerely would like to see more vegans in the world and along with them more vegan communities then it is for us who have recognized our sacred interconnectedness to LIVE boldly, joyfully, and unapologetically in alignment with that clarity. There is no need to attempt to discredit or even disassociate from those who do not hold the same standards as we. For just as we can see that there is a standard which we hold our selves to that is of great potential benefit to others once they recognize and embrace it, there are virtues that are being understood and embodied by those same others which we have not yet evolved into our own characters. If we would truly like to see the elevation of character for humanity, then the proper task would be for each of us to exemplify the humility and grace that we would wish for others and adopt every virtuous attribute that we are so fortunate to be offered either by suggestion or by the examples of others.
Concerning the issue of eating plants. It is my belief that we may someday arrive at a juncture in human evolution whereby we have the luxury to sincerely question the ethics of humans consuming plant life. It is not difficult for me to envision us exploring abstinence from taking the plants life by digging it up roots and all and other facets of plant consumption. For the time being, I don't believe that is a question that will serve humanity's present need for a compassionate blossoming. If the mainstream bulk of humanity were told that going vegetarian or vegan was no longer enough they could easily become discouraged and drop the whole idea completely. Initially, I believe that those who are on the plateau of a vegan lifestyle have their hands full just trying to elevate humanity to the next plateau. Even though books like 'The Secret Life of Plants' exist, they are not providing proof positive that plants have emotions or consider themselves 'hurt' when others eat their leaves. I personally believe that plants are designed to support the evolution of consciousness by providing an energy supply by which 'conscious' organisms can flourish. I may be proven wrong someday but as I stated earlier, I don't believe that this is an issue that needs to be argued or addressed at any great length right now.
In the interest of economy of energy I would suggest that emphasis be placed on evolving our SELVES to be as vital, intelligent, joyous, and compassionate as we can, and then apply that clarity at every opportunity possible to support humanity in IT's evolution as a complete organism; a complete, cohesive, compassionate, nurturing, thriving, (along with everyone else) and connected organism.

Perhaps I've overstepped the original question, but my intention was to address as many of the preceding queries and perspectives along with my response to the original impetus.

"In the interest of economy

"In the interest of economy of energy I would suggest that emphasis be placed on evolving our SELVES to be as vital, intelligent, joyous, and compassionate as we can, and then apply that clarity at every opportunity possible to support humanity in IT's evolution as a complete organism; a complete, cohesive, compassionate, nurturing, thriving, (along with everyone else) and connected organism."

right on. Not overstepped. Self first...centered calm clarity.

Yet as I was saying earlier this group is mostly for personal experiences and communities visited, lived in or being created. Would you mind writing a blog on your community and what it is all about? I'm sure some people would be interested!

thanks so much.

personally

In my personal experience the Universe is Life.
ALL is alive.
ALL gives, all the time.
In my experience, rocks are alive,
trees are alive,
broccoli is alive,
cows are alive.

As a human, I have the remarkable ability to make up & give attention to concepts which I may attach to emotionally, intellectually, etc.

If/when I take one of these concepts and start propagating a bunch of "YOU SHOULD ..."
-at that point I am creating schism within the brotherhood of humanity, creating reality-disconnect, arrogating myself unto some petty godhood, etc.
"ism-ism" is in my experience, an institutional(ism) of multiplicitous reality disconnect, a survial-chakra search for tribal safety.

As I previously stated, it is my (opinion/experience/etc) that factory farming (for meat AND vegetables) is perhaps THE major cause of threat to biodiversity & human survival on the planet.

Taking a page from Nature, I see that everywhere, all the time, endlessly, LIFE is giving to life, that life may BE.

Nature makes no distinction; blood is drunk as eagerly as milk; bones are crunched as eagerly as celery stalks.

Only man sets h/irself above nature.
This is my primal schism - my divorce from the totality of natural experience, my divorce from the larger reality upon which my very life is predicated.

I have no use for religious constructs, and no desire to be told by another human that h/ir belief system "SHOULD" be some part of my spiritual relationship with nature.

I love my vegan friends, all of whom put love and tolerance far above vegan-ISM.

ism, schism, etc.


warm wishes,
david hartley 510.859.4050  
www.holistiq.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer

you are...

right about "SHOULD" I've made efforts to edit it out as much as possible. It's not a fun word.

but also I must say:

We ARE nature making distinctions. That's one of the unique things about the human extention of nature. We are like that point when nature looks back on itself and is becoming conscious of its actions. Not above nature at all but an interesting evolution within it!

Also beware of becoming anti-ism-ISM.....ha

Honesty over Placation

Economy of Energy Allocation has been a deeply ingrained instinct in humans and, as far as I can tell, ALL Life. In order to get the most out of our efforts we need to THINK carefully about our choices and strategize the most ideal way to attain our goals especially if we are to avoid exhausting our resources. If our goal is Peace, then we must think carefully about our actions in order to avoid thwarting our own aspirations. If we understand 'Peace' to mean "freedom from threat", then it becomes clear that conducting ourselves as unthreateningly to those whom we share existence with as possible would be a prudent directive. The terms 'Right and Wrong', 'Better and Worse', 'Should and Shouldn't' only apply when we have an agreed upon aspiration. Once we understand and have an accord on the definition of the GOAL, we are in a much better position to agree on possitive or negative progress and thereby accurately attain it.
There have been times when men thought the goal was supremacy and dominance. History shows us where that got them. In a row boat called Earth I believe that conversations like this can help humanity to steer their collective destiny with greater accuracy. We have a profound opportunity before us to sculpt the character of a humanity that embraces the planet and its inhabitants as wholesomely and nurturinglly as a mother embraces her child. However when there are those in the 'boat' who would continue to 'drill more holes in the bottom of the boat to see if the water will go back out' and those of us who see the shoreline of Planetary Integrity and hence our collective survival in sight, changes must be made. We may choose to emphasize the urgency in different ways, some more graceful and perhaps some less, but the urgency remains. There may be those who develop aversions to being told that the boat is sinking but this does not make those who deliver the message as 'intolerant' or 'unloving'. On the contrary, I believe that the most loving act anyone can do for an addict (which is what those who commit self destructive acts are) is to deny them of the addictive substance or at least point out to them that they are destroying their life, their sacred opportunity to Revel in the Dance.
For those who claim 'Free Will' in such situations even though that which they do is detrimental to the greater whole I submit that they are denying the true gravity of our situation in favor of retaining familiar and comforting vices and addictions. Such is the rhetoric of addicts whether they be addicted to pharmaceuticals or flesh. Should we genuinely attain Peace in our world I suggest that it would be prudent to desist from making excuses and put down the self indulgent drill. Let me know if you would like support in this area. I'll be glad to help.
Thank you all for your honesty and willingness to engage in this exchange.

we

Who is this "WE"
.. you got a mouse in your pocket ?

"some of us".... clearly need to become a bit more adroit at
NON-VIOLENT communication,
which is alluded to by Eureka:

"I need to intervene just for one moment here.
I created this group as a resource and I would very much like to keep it based in first-person experiences."

so...
Unless "WE" can manage to speak as individuals, with respect for the thoughts and feelings of other individuals ... "WE" remain addicted to cycles of violence.
By the "logic" of the previous post "WE" .... "SHOULD" ...
deny the free will of posters who "deny the true gravity"
of the fact that a lack of non-violent communication,
is implicitly a failure to communicate and explicitly a form of violence.

Keep remembering: we are the ones we've been waiting for.

Let "us" conduct ourselves accordingly, and inspect our communications to see where our passions may be leading into counter-productive & anti-communitarian forms of expression.

Lastly, I encourage everyone to consider that the will to impose doctrine and to deny the will of others based upon supposed "superior understanding" is the type of sheer egotism and moral/ethical dishonesty which has got human society to where it is today.

"WE" must BREAK OUT of these patterns in order to transcend the chains of our past.


warm wishes,
david hartley 510.859.4050  
www.holistiq.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer

Shakespearian Honesty and a River in Egypt

”This above all: to thine ownself be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man.”
-Shakespeare-Hamlet

What Uncle Bill is trying to tell us is that until we are willing to be completely honest with ourselves we CAN NOT be completely honest with others. Have you ever tried to maintain a lie? Yes. Well OK then. You know exactly what I'm talking about. Your self contradicting responses are testimony to the suspicion that I have held about your attachment (addictions) to flesh or dairy or whatever it is that detains you from a more compassionate status. I wish you the best of everything but remember, 'Denial' is not a river in Egypt. Nothing violent going on here. Just ruthless honesty. Thanks for playing. Satyagrahi, is this conversation going in the direction you had hoped? I don't get the impression that it is.

Warm Wishes All

vegan-ISM

When people cling to obviously absurd beliefs
-such as the one "I know it all, you're full of crap"
which we see displayed here and all-too-often by those heavily afflicted by ANY ISM and very specifically including vegan-ISM
-- all possibility of intelligent / compassionate discourse ceases.

Y'all are sounding like a bunch of Christian fundamentalists, just a new Jesus, your saviour is vegan-ISM.

I don't care if it rains or freezes, long as I got my plastic veganISM glued to the dashboard of my car...

You may not get to know it until after your dead, but just a little clue for you:
Not I, not you, not any of us has "the WHOLE TRUTH."
When anyone is living in the FANTASYLAND the s/he has "the WHOLE TRUTH" we call that being infatuated with EGO.
Satyagraha = "non violent" -and pretending to oneself to be involved in satyagraha while judging other people and engaging in a verbally violent style of communication is a messy pile of hypocrisy.

If you can't come down off'a those holier than thou thrones and engage in non-violent communication after several requests, it is extremely likely that you will never have to worry about what an intention "SHOULD" be in community
-because you will never be fit to live in and take part in community.

Another clue: if you can't even manage a civil discourse on this topic with a person who is 80 - 90% vegetarian & has bunches of CIVIL, friendly, and polite vegan friends..

well, think it over:
How many converts are you gonna make for and with your ISM ?


warm wishes,
david hartley 510.859.4050  
www.holistiq.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer

seriously you guys?

come on, it doesn't have to be a dire serious battle of truths.

As for the vegans in this thread "you catch more flys with honey and sweet vegetables and great vegan recipes and exuberance and plant powered optimism" than guilt-tripping meat eaters. At least this has been my case....and my vegetarian friends did NOT guilt trip me when I ate meat and eventually I stopped on my own becuase I knew what was right for me.

And for David: Perhaps you want to try veganism or just think its a good move for other people...but you don't want it to be becuase these guys are telling you too. If you change your diet becuase some one is making you feel all bad about it it's probably not mentally or emotionally a healthy move. It's just a hunch. I hope you don't mind me supposing...
Personally I am not fully vegan but when I visit vegan communities and households I am. That's one of the good things about having vegan communities...its much easier with support.

Also the thread is begining to give me a headache.....let's have fun! It's actaully not fun to have to be right all the time or get the last laugh in arguments.

fun! magical peacefull try-new-things and learning....eh

Lets go Beyond

I would like to address the "isms", then add my own personal trials with ascribing to the Vegan diet.

Any kind of “ism” is prothletising a belief that is called upon to be a claimed truth, when it is only an experiential following of chosen thought. We all have our claimed, chosen truths, until we see beyond belief. Some are “good” some are “bad.” I once was a vegan, not long ago in fact, for over four years. Then my body shifted and asked to be fed nourishment that went beyond the vegan framework. When we box ourselves into these categorized groups, we are limiting our vison. I’m not saying don’t ascribe to certain protocols, I am only giving space to go beyond the pathologos. Being aware of the reasons why you choose a certain doctrine is central to go beyond belief.

Example, from my own experience, and what many others experience. You are given a book, or a video to watch exploiting the inhumane treatment of factory farmed animals. You See this suffering for yourself. It alters your perception, yet you only see a snipit of what is real. You may change your ways based on this teaching. Yes, this suffering is taking place, but you don’t have to partake, there are other ways than completely shifting your ways into this thought pattern that has already been formulated by someone else. It may be more difficult to seek out something that is outside your current frame of knowledge, what they tell you to do. Yet, it is fulfilling to know that you can create your own formula for health and for life. How must we return to a symbiotic relationship with Gaia? This is a question we should all ask ourselves. Look outside the box!

Back to the “isms,” today veganism is seen as a radical way of life that somehow transcends the ills of society, or so we are taught to think. When it is only another facet of the perpetual consumer way of life, and shuts doors into other realms of the true way of Gaia. Products of plastic wrapped soy, processed sweeteners, machine created materials that we transfer into our body as “food”. I can say that I have fulfilled my vegan pathologos, and learned much of what propels me today, so I see how it has shaped my current path. It has been an important thought pattern that prescribes what I see now. I’m not saying that I ever know the truth. I am a student of the universe, and learning what it is that influences my belief system.

Currently I have taken a liking to RAW Dairy, which is completely removed from the current model of pasteurized dairy. I was turned on to it by experiential stories of inner terrain modifying healings (contact me if you want to know more). Complete nutrition from animals that have been loved and cared for, produced through means of farming methods that work with the cycles of nature. Inside me, my terrain is filled with joy, utilizing all the vitamins and minerals I put into my mouth in the form of wild plants, superfoods, and fresh berries. Bottom line, it feels good in my body, and has propelled me into a higher existence. I can see beyond the logos that have shaped our society into this robotic model that questions nothing, into a place where I choose what to think and feel. Free Will. Liberum Arbitrium.

Agape,
AlchemyGoddess

Evolve or...

don't Evolve. That is the question AND the impetus for this website. What should our intentions be toward animals in community? is the impetus for this conversation. I see honest, meaningful communication transpiring between Satyagrahi and Eureka. Exploring the question candidly and respectfully. Throughout this string I have noticed David criticizing others for their 'isms' and their means of communication. Not once has he sincerely explored the ideas that are being presented. He is asking for 'tolerance' from those engaged in this string and along with that admittance that he is an 'OK' guy. All of this appears to be useful in the realm of establishing a healthy rapport. This site is devised to open lines of communication so that individuals such as ourselves can exercise diplomacy and effective communication. What David brings to the table is a form of communication that genuinely exists in the world. 'Working' with his thoughts provides the rest of us an opportunity to expand our sense of tact and 'tolerance' for those who employ such emotion based tactics. For this I am grateful.
Nothing that David has contributed addresses the notion that humans would be far better poised to create a Peaceful Realm if we continued to expand our circles of care and compassion to include non-human animals. At one point he claims that both animal AND plant farming at industrial levels "suck" but offers no resolution. Both Eureka and David accuse 'the vegans' of 'guilt tripping'. May I suggest that if you or anyone else should feel a sense of guilt because someone else points out to you that your actions are detrimental to your health, the planet, and, by the way, you are paying someone to take someone else's life with that commodity, then I would submit that a twinge of guilt on your part would imply that you are at some level of consciousness AWARE that you are doing something that you SHOULD NOT BE DOING. But hey, don't worry,slave owners during the abolition movement, implicit Germans during the Nazi regime, bystandiers in racist environments, and silent women during the suffragette movement all had the same problem, so don't feel like you're alone. Also, just like all of them, resentment for those who delivered messages of equality was exercised and confirmation bias was frequently resorted to. The same mental rhetoric is recognizable with addicts as well. Denial of harmful habits and resentment of those who reach out to help them for fear of being separated from their debilitating vice, is a parallel syndrome of both chemical and cultural addicts. Forgive me if my forwardness is not appreciated. A wise woman once said, "Where the Truth is hurt, defend it". i thought that that was a very good suggestion.

Warm Wishes

Truth and truth

In my experience there have been two ways of defining the word 'truth'. One is the 'truth' that each person holds their own unique perspective about the Nature of Reality. The other is Universal Truth, which I tend to distinguish from the other by spelling it with a capitol 'T'. Universal Truth is theoretically that which genuinely applies in all situations at all times. We humans like to use the term Natural Law to indicate a behavior that is so consistent in Nature that we have grown to rely on and expect that consistency to remain. Granted that even the so called 'Law of Gravity' is being scientifically scrutinized to determine it's validity, one might readily ask, "Who are we to insist what is right and what is wrong ethically/" It is this premise that some humans have chosen to either veer from social norms or cling to old value systems and castigate others for not readily commending them for their explorations. I am all for sincere Truth seeking which is why I have chosen to engage in this conversation. When I read the viewpoints of others that resonate with very familiar human patterns of denial and addiction, I express it. This is me offering my slice of truth to the thought pool. My hope is that with each of us contributing and receiving sincerely there is an ever improved chance of defining Truth a bit more clearly. Thus far every argument that I have ever heard that attempts to discount the idea that evolving to a more compassionate character individually or socially has been propelled by insecurities and a tendency to cling to old familiar comforts. Alchemy Goddess brings an interesting twist to this. She claims to feel better for having taken in raw milk and that the "animals that have been loved and cared for". I imagine that by today's standards the treatment they get looks a whole lot more loving and caring than what most receive. Yet the question here is, "How should animals be treated in community settings?" My personal truth is that we humans would learn a whole lot more about our selves and our place in Existence if we were to refrain from looking at sentient life as commodities or 'things' placed here for our exploitation, long enough (a few lifetimes) to let it sink in that THEY are US. If we were invaded by a 'superior intelligence' from another world would you willingly succumb to the 'loving care' that you afford the animals in your realm or would you prefer to be set free? Answer that honestly and you will have a better definition of the Truth about animal exploitation.

Maluhia

some new questions for you

I guess what I'm bringing to the table is that it's not so black and white. I must say when I'm vegan I do enjoy it and that's an incentive for me...
As for Truth with that big T I don't think it's so concrete but more of a balancing and re-balancing fluid flow and an explorative questioning...much more than an ism can stand for. Someone was talking to me about reaching enlightenment one day I said back without thinking that "enlightenment is a verb"

I with my little t , for example, think plants are very conscious and have souls....we don't hear them speak and they only move "up" but maybe they are just quiet beings even more sentient than humans. Taking ayahuasca or eating a psilocibe fungus and having that melding of consciousness between mine and the plants makes me think that they are faaaaaaaaaaaaaar from stupid or unfeeling. .....yet they don't mind being eaten which is curious.
How does this effect the big T and how many people have to agree with me?
How can we know plants aren't conscious! It's incredibly hard to know and perhaps warrents not assuming they aren't.
What's more conscious a lobster or a tree? Again can we ever be sure.

Lets say we let the animals free....all the cows and pigs and chickens. How do we go about this without doing more harm than good?
Beyond "pets" do you think humans and animals can be companions? Do you think we started as companions and as "civilization" progressed the concept of pets became more prevelant?
I almost feel like people enslave eachother just like animals perhaps without knowing it. They even keep children and loved ones as "pets"....why do you think people do this?
Are any of us free now that we privatized land and put up tons of fences....
chew on it if you will.

My golden rule is "you are what you eat".....a factory farmed animal, a plant reaching toward the sun, the milk of a cow kept in barn, a deer running through the forest.....by playing the game where I see through the eyes of my food I can make my own decisions without the being informed by isms.

Thanks for the imput on the intense and tricky territory here

animal husbandry

Ideally, in community, animals would be treated with kindness, fed wholesome foods so that their flesh may be healthy and wholesome for consumption when such time comes.

Some animals can do dual-duty, as organic tractors, which not only drop fertilizer here & there, but also are known to be much gentler on mother earth, not compacting soils as do other means of tilling .. also when thinning forested areas, draft animals do far less collateral damage on the forest eco-system .. and when they're no longer able to pull their weight, then can contribute valuable fats & proteins to the community diet .. their skins of course, can be tanned and used for a huge variety of purposes; shoes, clothing, halters for other animals,etc.

Chickens are another fabulous multipurpose farm animal, though they will wreak havoc on young or ground-growing crops .. when kept controlled by appropriate fencing, they will eat pests from crops and actually help with weeding .. of course they are another excellent source of fertilizer, and, like all other farm animals, yummy and good to eat ! Chicken soup has been known as a folk remedy for centuries .. especially in terms of flu .. which is interesting in that migratory birds are known to spread flu, and their droppings might be expected to pass virii along to the chickens, thus it makes good sense that chicken soup is time honored as good eatin' and good medicine.

Most of the tasks which farm animals may fulfill and the uses to which their flesh, skin, fur, feathers, and other body parts may be put ... are very well known by now .. as human agriculture has explored & developed animal husbandry for far longer than recorded history.

In many places where subsistence farming is the only option other than starvation, cows are the plough-horse, and can give enough milk to be a very significant part of a families survival.
Of course in an intentional community it might be hoped that starvation is not an issue; still it is wonderful that animals are able to provide willing labor as well as (sometimes) milk, and always eventually, their flesh and bone, for the good of the community.

Keeping sufficient number and species of animals so that the community is sustainable in terms of the labor input plus the protein food benefit should probably be a goal.

Revering all life and treating the animals with kindness during their lifetimes and treating their meat with appreciative relish and honor when their lives are ended should be a celebratory intertwining with nature & the Divine.

Good that you mention the enslavement of people by people, as there are always those who proselytize and act out their one-sided hostility in refusal / "inability" to communicate as loving peers with their community members .. no community can afford to include such "power flowers" -as they are referred to on "The Farm" in Tennessee, the largest non-religious intentional community in the U.S., which was at one point infiltrated by CIA agitators, sowing discord amongst the community using violent and anti-communitarian communications including gossip, name-calling, and other standard violence-prone techniques.

Many communities now purposefully study non-violent communications and as a group require that all member have agreements to stay in integrity with the group and each other, by consistent use of only non-violent communication methods.

Any community who fails to include this seems to be begging for troublesome times with members who might become filled with egoic nonsense whereby they believe they hold some "TRUTH" which others must be made to understand. Sadly, this is human nature, and until we can evolve into beings who are ever aware that truth is manifold and that kindness toward other humans (and yes, toward our beloved farm animals as well) communities must take steps to protect themselves from these kinds of ego driven attacks.


warm wishes,
david hartley 510.859.4050  
www.holistiq.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer

Rhetoric vs dialogue; peace/love vs coercive jargon

...and of course lots of finger pointing, judgementalism and circular logic psychobabble..

"how should animals be treated in community"
as a permutation of thread topic
"What should our Intention be towards animals in a Community?"

Well now, that would seriously depend on WHAT SORT of community, wouldn't it?
I personally have no interest in attempting to form "intentional community" with intolerant / militant vegans. Shouldn't be too hard to see why ?!

It should be noted (AGAIN) that this Evolver "Group" Intentional community, was created by other than the militant vegans who immediately marched in, set up camp and started firing off video volleys, followed up with tag-team vegan rhetoric. A perfectly synchronized military operation.

I am requesting (AGAIN) that the vegan militants tone it the hell down, or perhaps go and form a group for veganISM version of intentional community.

THREE of us here seem like we could have fruitful dialogue IF we could be allowed to do so without consistent veganISM militantISM.

In the reading I've done on intentional community, communication is one of the most highly valued items (which is why I keep attempting to re-direct the militant vegan rhetoric into realistic non-violent dialogue .. but it is getting old..)

The #2 thing has been perfectly exposed by this thread; it is having some very strong common belief system ... typical examples are religious beliefs (a militant vegan intentional community might be a great thing for you guys)
-other examples are permaculture / ecoculture, and so on.

someone wrote
"I would submit that a twinge of guilt on your part would imply that you are at some level of consciousness AWARE that you are doing something that you SHOULD NOT BE DOING"

Yah, you're right: I know better than to attempt dialogue with religious fundamentalist extremists .. whether they be rabid xtians or militant vegans, the rhetoric is supported only by their "holy scriptures"(and/or videos) .. circular logic, and the mind prison within which the extremist has taken refuge from the cruel and hostile world admit not the light & love of fellow humans who choose other-than conformance with (pick the ISM.)

In any community in which I would be desirous of taking part, the manner in which animals "should be" treated would likely be a topic for discussion, between prospective members who are capable of and extremely (more than almost anything !) willing to be in open loving communication, checking their closed-minded rhetoric at the door.

BTW, thank you Eureka & Alchemy Goddess for your excellent communications in this thread .. I hope we can convince our vegan brothers here to STAND DOWN with the militant rhetoric and lavish some of the concern which they claim to have for animals on US. In a bigger picture of the world we humans are herd animals kept by corporate masters ... this relates directly to the factory farming issues (animal or plant) .. and is a concept-in-common which would be something I would seek "in community."

In the interest of "being peace" and of love as the higher octave, this will be my last post concerning vegan rhetoric .. if you must post it, just fire away .. I'll quit reading and refrain from replying at the first hint of violent &/or party-line veganISM rhetoric. (but it would show some hint of self-respect .. as a reflection of respect for others .. if you would either cease the antagonistic/violent rhetoric & take part here as open and loving human beings.. or step-off)

thanks again,


warm wishes,
david hartley 510.859.4050  
www.holistiq.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer

levels of nonviolence

I agree with Home that this discussion "provides the rest of us an opportunity to expand our sense of tact and 'tolerance' for those who employ such emotion based tactics. For this I am grateful."
With that said, when rational discourse is continually averted by someone straying from the facts presented, the productivity of the conversation may have reached it's apex. For example, David continues to say that anyone in support of a vegan diet is automatically communicating "violently" (without being able to quote any such communication) and, employing his latest aggressive and slanderous label, which is ironically a form of violent communication, he calls those with vegan diets "militant".
Like Home also said: "Nothing violent going on here. Just ruthless honesty."
& also well said: "There may be those who develop aversions to being told that the boat is sinking but this does not make those who deliver the message as 'intolerant' or 'unloving'." Again becoming adamant about the necessity for nonviolent communication, while at the same time being noncommittal on the issue of the unnecessary murder of other breathing and feeling animals, is very strange. That's like getting upset when someone cuts another in line, but not getting upset when someone cuts another person's hand off.
Like I said earlier, when one ignores the actual heart of the discussion, the enslavement and killing of animals in a community, and resorts to name-calling ("pathological", "militant"), they not only are partaking in violent communication, which they are supposedly against, they also show that they have nothing of quality to offer the discussion.
Concerning some actual practice in nonviolent communication, this discussion has been valuable, ironically because those claiming to be practitioners are anything but, and they accuse those actually practicing n.v.c. of not, an Orwellian distortion that we can observe on the interpersonal as well as the socio-political realms of human life. As I stated earlier the behavior of projecting one's own negative behavior onto others is a very common behavior pattern among certain individuals, it's always drama/stress producing, and is commonly cited as part of a "toxic" personality. I think the best way to deal with it when encountered is to calmly point out the behavior and not get pulled into the manufactured negative drama which has no value for any of the the participants.
Returning to the original topic of discussion, the enslavement and killing of animals in community, I found the comments of Alchemy G curious:
"Yes, this suffering is taking place, but you don’t have to partake, there are other ways than completely shifting your ways into this thought pattern that has already been formulated by someone else. It may be more difficult to seek out something that is outside your current frame of knowledge, what they tell you to do. "
What does that mean exactly? Are you speaking in favor or not of a vegan ethic (nonviolence)? The more difficult route of "seeking something outside your current frame of knowledge, what they tell you to do" to me seems like a poignant endorsement of a vegan diet, for that's exactly what it is: going outside the current mainstream frame of knowledge that has been developed by some telling us what to do, through advertising, etc., that eating meat is good, normal and healthy. Also Alchemy G said that she was vegan for years until her "body shifted and asked to be fed nourishment that went beyond the vegan framework." Can you explain this "shift" more? And what nourishment is "beyond the vegan framework"? I'm unaware of any nutrients that cannot be found in a vegan diet. Also you said in reference to viewing video of animals in factory farms: "You See this suffering for yourself. It alters your perception, yet you only see a snip-it of what is real." Here it seems to me you're suggesting there's a greater truth that can be seen, something more real, a higher level of perception perhaps? Was that what you were indirectly suggesting? If so, what is this higher perception? What is "beyond" the "logos" of disgust at unnecessary suffering and violence?
I completely agree with you when you said: "Being aware of the reasons why you choose a certain doctrine is central". I'm very aware of the reasons for attempting to align with the central doctrine of nonviolence, and that's why I'm passionate about this cause, as I explained in a reply to Eureka. Isn't that a great unifying principle for a community?
I added a new video to the top of this page, "Peaceable Kingdom", I hope some of you will view it along with "Earthlings", and share your thoughts on them.

In hopes of a return to a rational and calm discussion,
Your fellow human "Evolver"

ad hominem attack - how does that relate to community?

This post commences with an ad-hominem attack and is clearly more of the militancy engaged in by the radical fundamentalist vegans.
This sort of veganISM is a cult of mind-programmed acolytes; you will hear the same arguments and the some militancy and inability to respond to HUMANS with the supposed "care" they wish to "give animals" by not consuming flesh or using other animal parts for other purposes, etc.

Go anywhere in the country, allow yourself to be dragged into a proselytization session with one of these types, and you will encounter the same words, the same tactics almost exactly .. this is because it is cookie-cutter cultISM.

This kind of thing will drag any community straight to hell, other than a community which is wholly made up of such cultists.

The militant rhetoric inculcated in such cultists is designed only for the purpose of creating more cultists.

There is an obvious lack of ability to take part in the desirable (necessary) forms of communication which would be found in a non-cultist community, which include an extremist fixated viewpoint -one may as well be talking to a wall when hoping to reason with or draw compassionate non-violent communication from such an afflicted individual.

The movies which the veganISM cult produces are designed for militarist "shock and awe" attack on emotionality .. a first step toward softening up the intended victims for brainwashing.


warm wishes,
david hartley 510.859.4050  
www.holistiq.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer

just because...

I want people to feel welcome and like they want to post on in this group....be they religious, meat-eaters, vegan or whatever else they are.

Is there anyway you and Home can come up with a thread or blog on the awsomeness of veganism or perhaps the intentions of the Optimum Living Alliance? so that people can see this welcomeing positive life-style to be a part of instead of a war of sharp tongues.

I think you and David just really know how to push eachother's buttons and it is not necessary to continue on with it when you really have a beautiful thing to communicate to whoever is interested{mind you it's not for everyone}
In a vegan community you come to the community as either vegan or with intentions to become vegan...you'll help those who are ready and interested without paying to much mind to those who are not.

You can only help people change when they are ready to change themselves...or so I've found....

peace

Word !

"In a vegan community you come to the community as either vegan or with intentions to become vegan...you'll help those who are ready and interested without paying to much mind to those who are not."

The rest of us can then peacefully pursue something which may well be 80 -90% vegetarian, without having the vegan bible thumped in our faces...

As I mentioned .. some of my best friends are vegans.
I'm glad they're able to relate to me with love and acceptance, with our common humanity as a bond which feeds all of us in ways that fruits & nuts cannot.

Thanks !!


warm wishes,
david hartley 510.859.4050  
www.holistiq.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer

Agape...

One question...Have any of you actually worked on a farm???

I am so grateful that the vegans here are so passionate about the protection of animal life. It is central to our being to be compassionate and caring for all that is part of the earth. I would like to explain a few things, if only to clear my own mind.

So, the suffering I refer to that is taking place on large factory farms, is not an issue with small family farms. The animals that live alongside communities that have a completely loving environment are well taken care of. I could go much deeper, but I will leave it at that. Just visit a family farm, or better yet work on a farm and see for yourself.

Now to address the idea of vegan being non-mainstream. You are correct, not many even know what being vegan means, but it is an idea that has already been conceived by someone other than yourself. It has a formula, a pattern to follow that is already set up, which most vegan beginners will follow. That is fine, but it doesn't address your own personal health, what works for your body. I was trying to poke at that idea, and it has nothing to do with animal suffering. What nutrients are essential for your body? Ask yourself that question, and you may not know because the path that you have followed up until this point may have unintentionally created ill health by not following what our body knows as intuition. We have lost this feeling as domesticated humans.

I am not about to tell someone what they do to their body is right or wrong, I only intend to provoke question. When we see these documentaries, they are filled with opinion and belief, that of someone else. Many are thought provoking and truly amazing, as are the videos that you suggest watching. Yet, they seem to only perpetuate an idea that there is a singular view, one that you should believe. They are trying to convince you of something. We all can relate to the suffering of animals, and the way that it makes us feel to see these horrific acts. Not good. This is the shock factor that immediately makes us susceptible to drop everything and make a radical shift. We may not interact more deeply with the question of whether eating animal products is "right" or not. Who are we to judge? Our own nutrition protocol is nothing that is known. "Scientific" research only goes into a fraction of what we know about body functioning. We can look at biased scientific studies and think one way or another, but there is always an underlying factor that can completely shift that study. Again, I am not trying to convince anything or anyone, only offer a deeper understanding of what it is that I believe.

On my shift to a non-vegan lifestyle. I was vegan for over four years, and completely raw for almost a year. The changes in my body and the nutrition it needs have been partly dependent on the fact that I am a fairly hard working athlete. So in this respect, I may have different nutritional needs, also my body is individual in its needs. Someone that may be perfect for the vegan diet, would be someone who is already in very good health, has no issues with inner terrain (bacteria), and can process vitamins and minerals at the optimal level. Many of us living in the polluted world that we have today have compromised terrain, and do not take in the optimum vitamin and mineral amounts. The reason to attain optimum nutrition is ultimately a spiritual practice, for myself. I find that when my body is functioning properly, I am much more aware of my own consciousness and can literally see more clearly. So, with that said, I had a problem with my inner terrain that I was unable to "cure" with a vegan diet. The Raw milk and other dairy products that I consume are completely organic (which doesn't mean much anyway) and obtained from farms with a high level of integrity. I would like to take a step further an go visit the farm that I currently get my dairy from, but haven't seen it yet. In the past I have been on farms where they raise their own goats and cows, and have fresh milk that has been loved to the highest level. And what I can say from the experience of consuming raw milk products is that I have completely reworked my inner terrain and now have the energy to function at the levels I desire. Not selfish in my opinion, since the energy I have goes into projects that I hope to inspire our community with.
As for the specific nutrients, if you call beneficial bacteria nutrients, that is one aspect. This bacteria is completely different from the bacterias that we use toculture vegetable products, and even though they are amazing, the results don't work as quickly as that of dairy. I saw that obtaining immediate health results was more important to me than staying fixed with a dogmatic (my own dogma) view of what I thought I needed. If you want more insight, please ask, I could go on forever. Thank you for listening to my insights and experiences.

alchemygoddess@gmail.com

thanks...

for taking part in this already quite molten thread. Usually I don't jump into the ones on fire so concider yourself a firewalker.
Personally I've lived at one desert intentional community and wwoofed on an organic farm for a few weeks this summer. I also have plans to continue living, working on, and visiting others.
I have not been to a dairy farm but I think it would be a good project to go and milk a cow and then figure out wether I think it's cruelty. I am under the impression that a lot of farms may think they are kind when they are not.....but also that there could be places which are familly with their cows....I was saying early on that the dairy farm in fairfield iowa is like that{sacred animals to maharishi hindu}

As for bacteria problems have you tryed EM-1 effective micro-organisms? those guys are so helpfull! Also low-sugar diets can starve harmfull bacteria...

peace

family farms, nutrition, food as medicine

What a lovely post, Alchemy Goddess !

As a child, my family had friends who ran a small family dairy farm, which I visited many times! Fond memories.. farm kids grow up very much "grounded" in ways that city kids generally are not .. the farm kid has gone through the drama of emotional bonding with an animal who is then taken as food in its time; learning and adjusting to this aspect of nature is a very valuable experience.
My friends' farm had none of the horrific aspects of factory farms, which are imho one of the leading causes of multiplicitous "systems breakdown" threats against biodiversity; even to the point of imperiling all "higher life forms" on the planet.

Factory farming of vegetables creates significant toxic runoff; offers as "food" to humans.. a very different and much less nutritious "product" than does organic farmed foods - locally grown foods add a whole additional benefit in the lack of transportation energy required .. and of course, can be well integrated with animal husbandry, in "time honored" fashion, where animals are a valued and necessary part of farm life.

Factory farming of animals takes the input of the vegetable factory farming, and then builds in some significant fraction of the horror that the vegan shock & awe films show .. In my alternative healing practice, I once had a client who had worked for the nation's largest chicken factory farms .. he was systemically poisoned by many toxic chemicals used in the processing.
I have not studied any comparison tests of the nutritive value of factory farmed vs family farmed animal proteins, but my intuition is that there will be quite a disparity, PLUS of course the difference of animals being treated with care vs. the factory farm hells.

I need to study your clear and gentle way of elucidating the programmatical aspect of vegan indoctrination .. it is quite true that the whole package is very well-plotted out as what is referred to in the "persuasion business" as a psy-op .. a psychological manipulation .. emotional shock followed up with relentless rhetoric... and a militancy directed against anyone who speaks up with a difference of opinion.

It is also interesting to hear your "my karma ran over my dogma" story about your attempt at a vegan diet.

On a family farm .. of course ALL milk is very fresh raw milk .. which has a very different digestibility than does the homogenized/pasteruized stuff put out by "conventional" factory farms.. if you take a wild fancy to visiting your favorite dairy farm, I'd love to meet & chat while driving there if you're in the company-for-roadtrip mood.

You also allude to a point known to many in the alternative health fields, which is that each of us is a unique individual, including our dietary needs/wants/responses, etc.

In TCM (traditional Chinese medicine) and Ayur Veda (ancient healing system of India) meats, dairy, and ALL foods are "medicine" (as Hippocrates is quoted as saying "let thy food be thy medicine") Chinese medicine has a saying "all disease enters by the mouth" ... so in cultures which have not been divorced from traditional wisdom .. animal proteins are "medicine" .. and depending on the individual (all systems of healing with any basis in reality must be capable of veiwing the individual as unique --- rather than some "statistical average") ... "Factory Medicine" is as terrible a thing as factory farming in it's similarly chemicalized assembly line approach to human health.

One of my major healing disciplines is homeopathy; the founder of homeopathy had been quite a scholar of the vitalist school of thought which has been historically passed from ancient Egypt to Pythagorian Greece ... one of the fundamental statements in the original writing on homeopathy is that
"in health, a spirit-like force 'enlivens' an individual; the rational spirit is free to use the self as an instrument to achieve the higher purpose of existence"
which alludes to the fact that it is the healer's "sacred" duty to facilitate health, thus assisting/enabling the individual to pursue life as "spirit having human experience."

Alchemy Goddess:
" If you want more insight, please ask, I could go on forever. Thank you for listening to my insights and experiences."
--

pray continue...


warm wishes,
david hartley 510.859.4050  
www.holistiq.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer

Delayed Response to Eureka

I too believe that plants have Souls. I believe that anything that has a purpose has a Soul.
I'm curious to know what gives you the impression that they don't 'mind' being eaten. Do we have a way to verify this?
There is no doubt in my mind that plants have consciousness. I believe that every single living thing (and quite possibly inanimate objects as well) are imbued with Divine Intention or what some refer to as Universal Intelligence. Name any single living thing that you can think of and try to separate its existence from all possible interpretations of Intention. Let me know if you think you have found one because I have not been able to do it. If its alive, it WANTS to be alive. I don't see plants a stupid either. I definitely believe that they have specific frequencies that they carry and transfer into our bodies when eaten. The higher frequency foods we eat, the higher our body/minds resonate and comprehend Reality.
When it comes to selecting my personal diet my first question is not, "Which is more conscious?" but "Which is more prone to suffering?". I believe that a tree can handle losing a few leaves or needles or bark a whole lot easier than a lobster without its claws or being dropped into a pot of boiling water. I also believe that one day we will most certainly be sure of this.
Lets say we let the animals free....all the cows and pigs and chickens. "How do we go about this without doing more harm than good?"
[I do appreciate being posed good questions { : ) ]
Personally, I have difficulty seeing how such a benevolent action COULD be more harmful than beneficial. Since you don't specify what the possible harm might be I'll wager that it has something to do with massive populations of formerly enslaved non-human animals running rampant throughout the town, city, state, country, or world (take your pick). It might be an inconvenience for us humans for a while but we could safely assume that such an action would have widespread support otherwise it would be a very unlikely scenario. Having chosen liberty and justice for the non-human members of our society, I can imagine a very helpful and compassionate humanity offering meals, comfort, and shelter to emancipated fellow Earthlings. Hardly a problem there. This argument reminds me of a comment my father once made in reference to going vegan. He said, "What will we do with all the cows?" quite satisfied with himself as though he had just found the Achilles heal of my vegan rationale. "But Dad", I replied stoically, "That's a lot like saying there's too much tobacco in the world therefore its up to some of us more dutiful types to get out there and smoke it. Do you really thing that makes sense?" Anyhow, he's addicted to his comforts and he'll be eating his way to an early grave. But you, you still have time. Have you ever managed to relinquish a self debilitating habit? If so, then you are aware of the power that you have within you at this very moment to do it again. You have said that you enjoy it when you're ‘vegan’. Why not treat yourself to that wonderful feeling more consistently? Do you think you might not be worthy of enjoying such a feeling on a more consistent basis? I believe you do. I would be delighted to know that you have chosen to make this a bigger part of your life. I would also be elated to be of support for you when you decide to actually make that commitment.

"Beyond "pets" do you think humans and animals can be companions?"
Absolutely and not just companions but FRIENDS. It's already happening. People have successfully allowed wild animals to bond with them. It would probably happen much more in a world where non-humans were granted the same freedoms that we humans presently enjoy.

"Do you think we started as companions and as "civilization" progressed the concept of pets became more prevalent?"

I don't have enough information to even make an educated guess on this one but I can see how that idea could have merit.

"I almost feel like people enslave each other just like animals perhaps without knowing it. They even keep children and loved ones as "pets"....why do you think people do this?"

[Such questions! Oy, what flattery]
From my perspective people enslave and oppress others because they believe that it is the lesser of two not very appealing choices. We look out into Nature and see two things. One is the herbivores, quiet, placid, and content, albeit prey for the carnivores. The other thing they see is the carnivores. strong, stoic, intimidating, and dominant. So we think that if the choice is between being prey; i.e. hunted, paranoid, victim, OPPRESED, and the other choice is as predator/OPPRESSOR, we opt for oppressor. If this were the reality of the situation I too would submit to being an omnivore.
However, there is now a THIRD CHOICE. It's called Nurturing. This is where we allow ourselves all the defense mechanisms we genuinely need to survive and thrive but then instead of sacrificing our fellow living beings we nurture them, Love them, embrace them, and play with them. The old played out argument that, “Plants are living too therefore why should we distinguish between them and non-human animals for food?” would actually serve only to validate human cannibalism if you were to hold that principle as a constant for all Life. Giving non-human animals cultivates benevolence in the human heart. Hmm, a world of people who have evolved their sense of benevolence—maybe there’s some merit in such an idea.

“Are any of us free now that we privatized land and put up tons of fences?”

Not as free as we could be. There is a freedom that awaits all of us. We are actually free in this moment to reach in and embrace it. The challenge that many of us are facing is that embodying our sovereignty triggers fear based reactions in others. This is why we are creating a haven where those who seek to embrace and embody Ahimsa; Intentional Harmlessness, can explore the blossoming of their hearts in a realm that is dedicated to supporting such aspirations. You asked for a blog on my projects. The creation of this haven is it. We just acquired the land, now we are seeking participants. You are welcome to email me if you would like to learn more about it.

Thank you for the sincere inquiries and for the exemplary communication.

Maluhia,

on the subject of "freeing the cows"

I wasn't so much bringing this up to defend my food addictions just to add some critical thinking to the discussion.
I like cows and I want them to be free but I don't think it's a simple fix.....there are so many of them at this point that when free they could render many species of plants extinct and with easy prey available the populations of predators such as wolves would skyrocket{granted I like wolves too} it would be a plus to have cow-patties EVERYWHERE lol It's just not asw simple as opening the door and yelling "BE FREE"
Do we neuter most of them before freeing them so they don't take over the earth?
Do we introduce them back into the wild slowly?
I guess they can become the new buffalo and roam the plains....
Do we specifically let them free in areas where there are over-abundance of invasive grasses?

Let's flesh out the answer to this? ;)

Bovinidae Pollution Solution

Hey Eureka,

THANK YOU for posing a very good question. The first thing I think we need to realize about the livestock (normally I avoid that term but I think it supports clear communication in this instance) population is that they are propagated- artificially inseminated and populated. As consumer demand diminishes so too will factory production and output i.e. insemination etc.. By the time humanity completely trails off of consuming meat there probably won't be any CAFO's left. All that will be left is the very few family or community operations which will of course be demonized by the morally evolved masses. Then they too will most likely disappear from existence and there won't be any massive populations of formerly enslaved beings to concern ourselves with. All that will be left are the offspring of the few refugees that were taken into sanctuary's and allowed to procreate so we would be able to include them in our legacy of mutual existence and evolution on this sacred planet. Problem solved. Please let me know if this was too oversimplified for you or if you have any insights to concerns that are not addressed here. You are a golden inquisitor. I'm honored by your query..

Aloha Alchemy Godess,

You, like Eureka, have posed some very constructive questions. Thank you. Yes, I have worked on a ‘farm’- GentleBarn, Sanctuaries- GentleWorld, swam with hundreds of dolphins, whales, turtles, and fish- Hawai’i Wildlife Fund, and been an educator in many varying venues. The animals on the farm that I worked at were never milked unless severe mastitis was prevalent and then only to alleviate the suffering of the cows. We spent copious amounts of time lavishing them with human affection (many of them came from extremely abusive pasts) and nourishing them. Although they came to us in grief, dismay, and with an understandable severe aversion to humans, they would all eventually melt to their natural inclination for comfort, affection, and play.
Although family farms are docile in their treatment, especially when compared to factory farms, the animals are still none-the-less captives, and enslaved. Blacks in the days of human slavery in America were often used for wet nursing, breeding, their children sold and prostituted, and of course, for hard labor. Harriett Tubman once said, "I could have freed many more slaves if only I could convince them that they were slaves." The slaves had become complacent about their environment. It is a natural tendency for children to acclimate to their environment. They knew of no other reality than being treated as chattel. The non-human people on your farm are under the same delusion. Once you have seen what a cow who has not been used as a commodity is like, THEN you will know the spirit that truly resides in those who we recognize as SENTIENT. If you could have experienced the difference in fish personalities between swimming with a spear gun with an intention to use it and then swimming without (as I have on both counts), then you too could begin to recognize that there is a connection that awaits all human beings with our sentient brothers and sisters that is beyond our willingness to regard them as a mechanism for our own profit. Their true value to us is not as commodities but as Teachers.

“What nutrients are essential for your body?”

I am a certified nutritionist and counsel people regularly on their diet. Every nutrient that the body needs is wholesomely supplied in a plant based diet. I have been advised by Dr. Michael Klapper, Dr. Michael Gregor, and Dr. John McDougall personally. I have read the works of Dr. T. Colin Cambell, (Who by the way, began his work by trying to provide MORE PROTEIN to underprivileged youth. In the midst of his work he began to find evidence that the protein surplus in developed countries was the leading factor in many of the diseases plaguing the ‘privileged’. {The most prevalent promoter of cancer btw, is cassein, the protein in cows milk.} During this study he decided to go vegan. He remains so today) and am consistently counseled by Nutritionist Steve Blake, my friend and neighbor who has written several books including college text books on nutrition. They all agree; There is no nutrient in the mammary secretions or flesh of non-human animals that surpasses the nutritional composition of a wide variety, whole foods, plant based diet. In the realm of psychology it is not uncommon for those who have acclimated to a specific diet from a young age to revert back to it as a comfort mechanism. Substance abusers follow nearly identical behavior patterns. You live in Kilauea. Go to Kona Naturals or Abundant Life and look for Taro Dream. It is made by my friends Noeau and Pilikalama who live in Waimea (who are not vegans) It has natural flora and is some of the best vegan yogurt I have yet to experience. I’m sure that there will be plenty of other options for probiotics as well. My suspicion is that once you have balanced your terrain and assuaged your discomfort with non-conformity you will attain an ever higher resolve for your contributions to your world. I wish for you much happiness and the joy of non-exploitative healing.

Maluhia ia Oe

This has been a fascinating

This has been a fascinating hour spent reading all of this, and there are so many points I'd love to make, but they fell out of the roller coaster somewhere along the way! So we will see where this goes.
I was vegan for a short time and found this was not sustainable for my body. First, raw honey is the awesomest for my allergies, love it! Secondly as a mother of two little girls, I felt I was spending too much time in the ethers and was lacking some of the grounding energy I received from animal protein. This is a bio-individual issue totally. What works for me probably wouldn't work for anybody else. So, I found having animal protein once or twice a week works pretty well, but I go with out it when I can't get good quality meat from the farmer's market. Here's why-

No doubt, we are what we eat. i happen to be very sensitive to the energy of my food, I had tasted a fear burger once my intuitive gifts had become stronger and steer clear of that! It made me angry and scared. I can tell when I consume an animal if it was content, joyful, or fearful. I am also able to communicate with animals (something I can say here, that I might not say anywhere else!), when they're happy, they are totally blissed out! My vendor at the farmer's market has passed my twenty questions as to the treatments of the animals there, since I don't drive,I can't visit the farm, so I had to take his word. Factory farming / big Ag are bad, bad, bad, I'm sure I don't need to elaborate.

About plant consciousness- I was eating sprouts, and the energy of these things were incredible, and I had a crisis, for a moment, "who am I to eat these things??" I ate them anyway, and I felt so energized by them and this is about to bring me to my point-

The consciousness is not destroyed, only the vessel. It lives on in me, and moves forward in the positivity I create. Energy is neither created nor destroyed, it just moves forward, creates more. That is what food is, our fuel in meeting our purpose. As long as we are eating foods that bring us to our purpose, what else is there? Being vegan for me didn't do it, but it does it for others. The important thing is that you attune yourself to yourself and your environment you are in, be as present as possible, and live your joy and passion, and evolve!

So, as a counselor, i am always putting myself in other people's shoes. So I asked myself if I was cared for and loved, and succumbed to the present moment every moment, would I sacrifice my body for a greater good? Hell's yeah! I mean, not in a suicide bomber way, but maybe you know what I mean. I think this question speaks to our attitude towards death. I just don't fear death. I recall my mother on her deathbed, being excited about leaving behind all the bullshit.

Another important thing is to honor the body, mind and spirit, and feed those things accordingly. I bless everything that goes into my mouth. Death is a part of life, ingesting food is a part of life, and when I'm done throw my bones in the ground so it can nourish the Earth. Let my dog knaw on the bones, I don't give a damn, because my spirit will be free and I can take care of business wherever I am!

So forgive me on my raw chocolate high, but this is a passion of mine. Live by YOUR truth and you won't go wrong.

~going sane in a crazy world~
Alex

Hi Alex

Welcome to the party! A few points which you make that I would like to respond to...
First your query...
"As long as we are eating foods that bring us to our purpose, what else is there?"

Through my commitment to harmlessness, first through my diet and then to everything else that i can include, I have found that my Purpose is to explore and share the realms of Connection that are available to human consciousness via this Sacrament of Reverence for Sentient Life. Now that I have walked these footsteps for well over a decade I vividly recognize many of the fallacies that I used to cling to and others still do. One in particular that I have alluded to earlier in this string is the self delusion behind exploitation. A great book on this is called The Dreaded Comparison by Marjorie Spiegel. In it she details the similarities that human attitudes have displayed in the enslavement of other humans and our modern day enslavement of non-human animals. One of the most stark examples is the denigrating attitudes that we have taken upon those whom we oppress.
Blacks in the slave trading south had names like 'spook', 'goon', 'jiggaboo', and of course, 'nigger'. All of them were used pejoratively. Today we use the word 'animal' pejoratively in reference to other humans as well as non-human sentience in general. We use the same words to denigrate people that we use to classify non-humans. We call someone 'chicken' when they are afraid, or 'pig' when they are sloppy or ravenous, an 'ass' when they are stubborn or fixed in their position. I could go on and on. Denigrating those who we seek to oppress supports the illusion that our lives are somehow worthy of their suffering, but when we stop to sincerely think about our rationale we can readily see the fallacy behind it. For example; Albert Einstein, Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Peace Pilgrim, and Julia Butterfly Hill have all been incredibly intelligent and benevolent members of our society. Does this entitle them to dine on sacrificial members of humanity? Perhaps a child who has been torn from its mother at birth? What a fine and fitting delicacy to place before those who so utterly deserve the 'best'. When viewed from this perspective the whole notion seems not only illogical, its downright macabre. My hunch is that you, as a mother of two beautiful daughters, can empathize. But taking this same premise and applying it to our own culture is a very deep and unsettling reality for many. And many do choose to either run from such clarity or berate and denigrate those who would speak such stark Truth. In the foreward to 'The Dreaded Comparrison' which is written by Alice Walker the author of 'The Color Purple' she states, "The animals of the world exist for their own reasons. They were not made for humans any more than black people were made for whites or women for men."

Since I have never heard of a single case of human exception to our biological design to thrive exclusively on vegetation, I can't help but feel skeptical about your claim that,

"I felt I was spending too much time in the ethers and was lacking some of the grounding energy I received from animal protein. This is a bio-individual issue totally. What works for me probably wouldn't work for anybody else."

I know the syndrome of being in the 'ethers'. I have witnessed it in others and experienced it first hand. What I must say about such conditions is A) Being in the ethers has its applications. It can be a great way to attain greater clarity for personal directives. WHERE and WHEN you explore this can be critical however B) It can be inappropriate for certain environments such as raising children in a society that does not value having people in their presence in such states, and C) Grounding can be easily achieved via tubers, grains, nuts, seeds, and other high density, cruelty free food sources.

By the way, I'm glad to read that you 'communicate' with (non-human) animals. Of course I believe you. What I don't know is if you mean to say that you are allowing yourself to tune in to their utterances and gestures for consistent intent or if you are telling them to 'sit'. I will opt to err on the side of interpreting them accurately. I'm sure that if you were to listen to them even more closely you would hear them say what Washoe said to his 'trainers' when they taught him sign language. In unequivical terms Washoe spoke for all exploited and oppressed Earthlings when from the confines of his cage he formed his first sentence. It was, "LET ME OUT".

Although it's true that death seems to be an implicit part of life, this should not imply that murdering is an acceptable part of life too. Especially when human consciousness has begun to bloom with the awareness that neither our health nor our happiness are dependent upon anyone else's suffering or death. I'm hoping that some of these insights will find their way into your counseling sessions.

Thank you for encouraging me to "Live by MY truth". For me, living by my truth means not only exemplifying it in my actions but speaking or writing it when the opportunity arises.

Seize the Day Alex,
Go Vegan!

Inspection bureau of Other People's Food Choices

>>"As long as we are eating foods that bring us to our purpose, what else is there?"

d: None really - fixation by any one faction as to what others "should" eat might be funny if it weren't so invasive -- not to mention possibly damaging to health, as no two individuals are exactly alike .. and as is well known around the world to both common sense and to holistic medical systems .. animal protein is medicine to some people, some of the time .. and of course is plain good nutrition in general.

>Through my commitment to harmlessness, first through my diet and then to everything else that i can include,

d: okay that seems a bit odd, again the primary fixation on diet? ah well, it's your life.

> I have found that my Purpose is to explore and share the realms of Connection that are
>available to human consciousness via this Sacrament of Reverence for Sentient Life.

d: Interesting, so we Do have Something in Common,
it's just that my Purpose with all the realm & such is aligned more with the evolution of human consciousness,
in which area, of course, what people eat is largely immaterial ... even people who exist solely on spam sandwiches are human, have consciousness and in their own fashion are evolving (some of the spam eaters may actually be evolving more rapidly than people who believe that they already possess some Gospel Truth.)

>Now that I have walked these footsteps for well over a decade I can see many of the fallacies that I used to cling to and others still do.

d: mmm.. yeah, like the fallacy of "The Enlightened One" ? We've all got our own truth. None of us has a lock on some supreme truth. (except for the preceding two statements ;)

>One in particular that I have alluded to earlier in this string is the self delusion behind exploitation. A great book on this is called The Dreaded Comparison by Marjorie Spiegel. In it she details the similarities that human attitudes have displayed in the enslavement of other humans and our modern day enslavement of non-human animals. One of the most stark examples is the denigrating attitudes that we have taken upon those whom we oppress.

d: hmmmm.. YES ! We can see some stellar examples of this earlier on in this coversation thread !

>Blacks in the slave trading south had names like 'spook', 'goon', 'jiggaboo', and of course, 'nigger'. All of them were used pejoratively.

d: "had names like" ? mm.. that doesn't sit right, nor does the blaxplotation involved with invoking the race card here, especially as it evokes hatred ! (can't you just be nice?)

>Today we use the word animal pejoratively in reference to other humans as well as non-human sentience in general.

d: many words are used in many ways, animal, like other words can be used in a friendly positive way - or not.

>We use the same words to denigrate people that we use to classify non-humans. We call someone 'chicken' when they are afraid, or 'pig' when they are sloppy or ravenous, an 'ass' when they are stubborn or fixed in their position. I could go on and on. Denigrating those who we seek to oppress supports the illusion that our lives are somehow worthy of their suffering, but wen we stop to sincerely think about our rationale we can readily see the fallacy behind it.

d: we, we, we, the Royal WE. Dude. You are not a WE. you are an i. You, yourself and you.
AND.. your compassion seems boundless for the animal objects of other's appetites, yet you seem to be missing the most important thing in this life, which is our interconnections with other humans. I have seen how quickly you are moved to denigrating humans who do not agree with your veganISM. In order to have some consistency (which might also be referred to in this vein as integrity) .. it seems that denigrating and making pejorative references to humans who you are in some form of communication with puts you in a position of lacking integrity in terms of your arguments, don't you agree?

>For example; Albert Einstein, Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Peace Pilgrim, and Julia Butterfly Hill have all been incredibly intelligent and benevolent members of our society. Does this entitle them to dine on sacrificial members of humanity?

d: uh... can you say straw man ? wait, let me guess you'll be pretending that eating animal flesh is the same as eating babies..

>Perhaps a child who has been torn from its mother at birth? What a fine and fitting delicacy to place before those who so
utterly deserve the 'best'.

d: HAH !! I knew it. I think we could serve them baby quail, but human babies ...mmmm... prob'ly not?

>When viewed from this perspective the whole notion seems not only illogical, its downright macabre.

d: your imagination & straw man argument is what is macabre. offensive too. not to mention transparent.

>My hunch is that you, as a mother of two beautiful daughters, can empathize.

d: laying it on... hey, referee .. cheap shot!

>But taking this same premise and applying it to our own culture is a very deep and unsettling reality for many.

d: I would say not unsettling, but rather immaterial, unimportant, a serious stretch of "logic" which may be valid only in the presence of a fixed fringe viewpoint.

>And many do choose to either run from such clarity or berate and denigrate those who would speak such stark Truth.

d: haha, there is the fixation: "Truth." Dunno who died & made you god, but I think it's all in your head !
One man's truth is another man's hokum, just as one man's meat may be another man's poison.

> In the foreward by Alice Walker the author of 'The Color Purple' she writes, "The animals of the world exist for their own >reasons. They were not made for humans any more that black people were made for whites or women for men."

d: Creationism ?? Holy Guacamole! Dude, we EVOLVED. So did the animals. Nothing was 'made for' anything, it is all just happening... and happening ... and happening.

>Since I have never heard of a single case of human exception to our biological design to thrive exclusively on vegetation,

d: uh? I believe that anyone else reading this thread would have heard THREE instances of people who did not thrive on vegetation; humans did not evolve as thrivers upon vegetation, we evolved as the top meat eating predator on the food chain. We've got dentition to prove it. Fossil records .. tens of thousands of books .. all that good stuff.

>I can't help but feel skeptical about your claim that,

d: 'kay, that's just wrong. When someone says something about their state of being .. your claming disbelief is a form of violent communcation. "Evolved" (and even wannabe evolved) humans do not tell other humans what those other humans are "really" feeling/thinking.

>>"I felt I was spending too much time in the ethers and was lacking some of the grounding energy I received from animal protein. This is a bio-individual issue totally. What works for me probably wouldn't work for anybody else."

d: We are each our own best guides .. as we tune in to our intuition and observe what helps us thrive we are able to maintain our optimum health .. kudos for being so in touch with yourself !

>I know the syndrome of being in the 'ethers'. I have witnessed it in others and experienced it first hand.

d: weird. you're hopping around here from denying the person's stated self assessment ... to attempting to "own" it and warp it to suit your argument. Subtle violence, a "clever" persuasion / psy-op technique. Do you really think people are unaware of these pitiful manipulative techniques?

>What I must say about such conditions is A) Being in the ethers has its applications. It can be a great way to attain greater clarity for personal directives. WHERE and WHEN you explore this can be critical however B) It can be inappropriate for certain environments such as raising children in a society that does not value having people in their presence in such states, and C) Grounding can be easily achieved via tubers, grains, nuts, seeds, and other high density, cruelty free food sources.

d: Grounding can be easily achieved by having a nice fat cruelty free kosher butchered steak, too.

>By the way, I'm glad to read that you 'communicate' with (non-human) animals.

d: HEY ! what's that (non-human) doing there ? Animals is animals, humans is humans, check your dictionary if you get confused.

>Of course I believe you.

d: flip flopping again .. ideally evolving humans would make an extreme effort to believe first-person statements .. it is arrogant (see dictionary) to do otherwise and it is massively patronizing to then pick out some other statement upon which to bestow belief.

>What I don't know is if you mean to say that you are allowing yourself to tune in to their utterances and gestures for consistent intent or if you are telling them to 'sit'. I will opt to err on the side of interpreting them accurately. I'm sure that if you were to listen to them even more closely you would hear them say what Washoe said to his 'trainers' when they taught him sign language. In unequivical terms Washoe spoke for all exploited and oppressed Earthlings when from the confines of his cage he formed his first sentence. It was, "LET ME OUT".

d: AnthropomormphISM

>Although it's true that death seems to be an implicit part of life, this should not imply that murdering

d: oops.. another read-your-dictionary fixable error

>is an acceptable part of life too. Especially when human consciousness has begun to bloom with the awareness that neither our health nor our happiness are dependant upon anyone elses' suffering or death.

d: nope. evolving humans who are living in the top 3% of wealth & privilege (such as having countless hours to debate about what others actually have the ability to CHOOSE what to eat, in a world where many are starving and some nice rat meat or a few fat beetles will make the difference between starving or not) ... are becoming quite aware that our privilege comes at great price to many other humans on the planet. Many of us are DEEPLY concerned about this, and tend to feel it entirely trivial what some fringe ISM proselytizes in totally unrealistic fashion. While no one I know advocates cruelty to animals, most are not obsessed with what other people eat. Almost none are checking out other's toilets, either.

I'm hoping that some of these insights will find their way into your counseling sessions.

d: Alex clearly has plenty of insight, and as a trained counselor will no doubt see thru the manipulative rhetoric.

>Thank you for encouraging me to "Live by MY truth". For me, living by my truth means not only exemplifying it in my actions but speaking or writing it when the opportunity arises.

d: who is encouraging you ? clearly it matters not. "T"ruth, and all that rot. On the other hand, I personally congratulate you for being happy about your diet, though I do wish you would see how erroneous it is to attempt to impose it on others by coercive communication techniques.

>Seize the Day Alex,
Go Vegan!

d: Been, there, done that is what she said .. didn't work, thanks anyhow, have a nice day.


warm wishes,
david hartley 510.859.4050  
www.holistiq.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer

Dude, no doubt you live your

Dude, no doubt you live your truth, I think I could say that of everyone I've encountered so far on this sight, it's pretty great.
So, to respond- enslavement is one thing, being cared for is another. Granted, I eat, and egg sometimes, maybe some sushi, I'm no raging burger eating fiend. Which, btw, I think the amount of beef in this country contributes to herd mentality, no?
Anyway, Small family farms, the ones I know of, and the people I know who raise animals for slaughter take really good care of them. They have a quality of life. They are cared for. I saw the issue of pets and children mentioned before- they are cared for. No, I don't anyone to eat my kids, although ask me another day I may have a different answer! No, I'm kidding, anyway, my point is that a humane or conscious death death is one moment in a life that has hopefully been content in the cases of which I speak. Natural death takes a long freakin time, have you ever seen it? heavy. And animals are blessed with a lack of ego, so they lose their body, but their spirit continues.

On the issue of murder, totally not a good thing, I think we can agree on that. I had to put my cat down once, it was the hardest thing ever, but he followed me home, anyway, happy to be walking again.

On the issue of communicating with animals, I mean, I can't justify any of that to anybody, there is a level of faith involved, I can just say that I see what I see, feel what I feel, and hear what I hear. I still have some pets with me that I've lost, and they help out. The thing with animals is that they are such joyful creatures. Many are more powerful than they get credit for, same with children. Not always, of course, and I can't speak for every chicken, or what ever, but they have a greater capability of living in the moment, and that pure state of bliss and oneness that I know I strive for. I mean, my cat is sitting here purring for no reason other than pure joy of isness. this doesn't include factory farms, of course, which are horror shows.

And the ethers are lovely, I still go there! It just doesn't get the house clean, lunches packed, emails returned and what-have-you from up there! One day, I'll live in a cave on the side of a mountain and meditate all day, but until then, I have poop to clean up and dirty dishes! I f you come do my dishes, and clean up all this poo I'll go vegan ok? lol! I know how to do vegan right, it's just an individual thing, I really think that. I do know cases of vegans incorporating fish oil or an egg here and there and having improved health. I also know cases of going raw vegan, and that being the answer for some people. I just think it's interesting, no one knows our own bodies better than ourselves. These are conclusions, one ultimately needs to come to on one's own.

I deem this day seized, now I go to bed!

I will be thinking of the ways I am enslaved, and meditating upon that-

Love and blessings to all!
Alex

Top of the day Alex

I happen to have just had some free time land in my lap and I am enjoying this conversation. First item...

“the people I know who raise animals for slaughter take really good care of them.”

As I mentioned earlier, humanity has become so ingrained in the culture of oppression that it has become difficult for many to conceive of the duality of animal exploitation. Conveniently placing non-humans in a separate category from humans does not justify murder, no matter how ‘well’ the victims are 'taken care of.' Perhaps I’m beating a dead
 (did you think I was going to write ‘horse’? This is another example of how our language perpetuates cruelty) intellect here. Honestly, I really appreciate your willingness to engage in this conversation and be frank with all of us. I’m doing my best to return the sentiment. As much as you would not want anyone to raise your children for slaughter neither do cows, pigs, chickens, or anyone else. This seems to be a very difficult concept for humans to groc. If we can understand why a mother screams and rages when her children are taken from her why is it so difficult to understand why non-human mothers do the same for their children? Has human culture become so steeped in the culture of cruelty that we are just incapable of FEEELING the torment that we put other life forms through with our unquestioned behavior? I choose to believe not. I believe that somewhere within every single beating human heart there is a sense of connection and empathy for those who suffer at our hands. Whether by commission or omission we humans are still challenged to see the suffering and havoc that we bring not only to those whom we share this beautiful world with, but our selves, our friends, our family’s and our progeny as well. Until humanity has awoken to the sensibility of expanding its circles of compassion to include those who we share existence with, we will not know the heights of Peace that await us and our loved ones. On the day that we do embody such sensitivity and warmth however, the world will know a more vivid definition of the word ‘Love’ than ever before. When we’ve been there ten thousand years bright shining as the Sun. We’ll have no less days to sing God’s praise than when we first begun. Amazing Grace. Whew, that felt good. OK I’ll come down off of my pew now and where were we? Oh yes, next comment


I do know cases of vegans incorporating fish oil or an egg here and there and having improved health.

Comments like this provide fodder for misinformation. There are many factors involved in health far beyond diet. As I mentioned earlier in this string, one of them is called ‘comfort regression’ whereby people (those addicted to chemicals included) will often revert to old familiar comforts when the new lifestyle adjustment they are trying (like health or expanded compassion) becomes uncomfortable. [Anytime we explore a change in the things we put in our body (or mind) there is an acclimation period to go through. During this time we can often feel discomfort and be tempted to regress from our aspirations. Projecting in our minds that the missing ingredient is the old vice that we once patronized many will resort to that substance. The mind, being a very powerful tool, then engages the placebo effect and releases hormones that provide the comfort that the aspiring addict seeks] Then they say, “Oh, I feel much better now”, and then those who do not have the discretion to question the bigger reality say, “How ‘bout that. It seems that fish oil and eggs is good for you after all”. These are just more examples of the myopic thinking that has muddled humanity into the chaotic mess that we are now in. I do look forward to the day that all of this is behind us and we can get on with the business of hangin’ out in the ethers. Meantime, thanks for playing. Btw- I clean up the poop for my son and do the dishes for my wife and she makes me some of the finest vegan dishes this side of the Sun. Let me know if you ever want to come over to the house sometime. You can get some vegan pointers from Brook (or just get her recipe book, Incredibly Delicious) the girls can come and splash in the waterfall, eat from the gardens, pedal up the water pumps, and climb a tree or two if they like and even spend time huggin' and playin' with the furry, feathered, finned, and four legged members of the family.
Oh what Heavenly days await us.
Hallelujah and pass the hat!!!

the tag team

>I happen to have just had some free time land in my lap and I am enjoying this conversation. First item...

>>“the people I know who raise animals for slaughter take really good care of them.”

>As I mentioned earlier, humanity has become so ingrained in the culture of oppression that it has become difficult for many to conceive of the duality of animal exploitation.

d: this is rhetoric, it relies on veganISM doctrine, without which it is plain silly. Humanity and animals have evolved in spiritual partnership for 100,000 years. more.

>Conveniently placing non-humans in a separate category from humans does not justify murder,

d: oops, that read-your-dictionary error again

>no matter how ‘well’ the victims

d: oops, family farm animals treated with love and care can be called victim only within the fixed veganISM doctrine

>are 'taken care of.' Perhaps I’m beating a dead
 (did you think I was going to write ‘horse’? This is another example of how our language perpetuates cruelty) intellect here.

d: no, this is another example of the tired straw man argument .. set 'em up, knock 'em down, wow, aren't we clever.

>Honestly, I really appreciate your willingness to engage in this conversation and be frank with all of us.

d: me too ! Thanks Alex, you rock :-)

>I’m doing my best to return the sentiment. As much as you would not want anyone to raise your children for slaughter

d: what is it with you guys? you are so lost in your veganISM doctrine that you fail to see how ridiculous this is to people just a wee bit more toward the mainstream. My children are humans. Animals are animals. check your dictionary if you get confused.

>neither do cows, pigs, chickens, or anyone else.

d: anthropomorphISM..

>This seems to be a very difficult concept for humans to groc.

d: spelling police: grok. it is grok, did you read the book?

>If we can understand why a mother screams and rages when her children are taken
from her why is it so difficult to understand why non-human mothers do the same for their children?

d: seriously, get out your dictionary. read human. read animal. note lack of "idem" Not at all the same,
not even similar in many ways, you (I mean YOU) veganISM-ists here are conflating human & animal.
Others of us a wee bit closer to the mainstream have some distinctions between the two.
It is not likely that people will be confused by your attempt at reinterpreting the English language here.

>Has human culture become so steeped in the culture of cruelty that we are just incapable
of FEEELING the torment that we put other life forms through with our unquestioned behavior?

d: Well, clearly the corporate culture has. Maybe your efforts would be better spent working with other slightly closer to mainstream evolving humans toward the dismantling of factory farming .. than with sharpening the knives of your rhetoric and attempting to inflict mental cruelty on people who (here anyhow) basically KNOW BETTER than to fall for manipulative psychobabble ?
Really! think of it~! You could forge alliances instead of alientating folks. Please suggest this to your superiors at veganISM central office.

>I choose to believe not. I believe that somewhere within every single beating human heart there is a sense of connection and empathy for those who suffer at our hands.

d: I choose not to offer my beating human heart into the grasp of veganISM hands which would attempt to wring it to suit their fringe agenda.

>Whether by commission or omission we humans are still challenged to see the suffering and havoc that we bring not only to those whom we share this beautiful world with, but our selves, our friends, our family’s and our progeny as well.

d: YES.

>Until humanity has awoken to the sensibility of expanding its circles of compassion to include those who we share existence with, we will not know the heights of Peace that await us and our loved ones.

d: On the day during which veganISM-ists expand their circle of compassion to include their fellow humans with some fraction of the fervor in which they exhort veganISM doctrine .. on that day will vegans know great and lasting peace & connection with their fellow humans.

>On the day that we do embody such sensitivity and warmth however, the world will know a more vivid definition of the word ‘Love’ than ever before. When we’ve been there ten thousand years bright shining as the Sun. We’ll have no less days to sing God’s praise than when we first begun. Amazing Grace. Whew, that felt good. OK I’ll come down off of my pew now and where were we? Oh yes, next comment


d: "Come down off your throne, and leave your body alone. Somebody must change. You are the reason I've been waiting so long. Somebody holds the key." Only you can free yourself from the blindness of veganISM. "Rehumanize yourself"

>>I do know cases of vegans incorporating fish oil or an egg here and there and having improved health.

>Comments like this provide fodder for misinformation.

d: sure, as viewed from the fixed and narrow focus of veganISM .. to the rest of the world veganism appears to be a disinformational cult when it appears in prosyletizations and coercive communication.

>There are many factors involved in health far beyond diet.

d: many factors, yes, but none of such prime import. - hey. I thought you were urgently & critically concerned with diet.

>As I mentioned earlier in this string,

d: thread.

>one of them is called ‘comfort regression’ whereby people (those addicted to chemicals included) will often revert to old familiar comforts when the new lifestyle adjustment they are trying (like health or expanded compassion) becomes uncomfortable.

d: aha, the old "it's all in your mind" explanation. I think not. I think that people try vegan diets, and if/when they fail to thrive on them, they add some animal protein and regain their vigor. If y'all could get off the veganISM and just get right with watching your OWN diet & letting others watch theirs, I think everyone would be a lot better off.
Sadly (VERY SADLY) the mindtrap of the doctrine has you so tightly wrapped that you can't seem to see the 80% value to everything vegan execpt the ISM .. that an 80% vegetarian diet represents, instead you wanna bust balls over the 20%.
Self Defeating.

> [Anytime we explore a change in the things we put in our body (or mind) there is an acclimation period to go through. During this time we can often feel discomfort and be tempted to regress from our aspirations.

d: maybe you. If you'll stop pretending to be an expert you might start getting a feel for what some of the other readers are thinking when they read your stuff.

> Projecting in our minds that the missing ingredient is the old vice that we once patronized many will resort to that substance. The mind, being a very powerful tool, then engages the placebo effect and releases hormones that provide the comfort that the aspiring addict seeks] Then they say, “Oh, I feel much better now”, and then those who do not have the discretion to question the bigger reality say,

d: psychobabble

>“How ‘bout that. It seems that fish oil and eggs is good for you after all”.

d: YES ! you're catching on ~!

>These are just more examples of the myopic thinking that has muddled humanity into the chaotic mess that we are now in.

d: yeppers, it is a valuable demonstration you are providing of muddled humanity struggling under the weight of veganISM, and YES again, this type of factionalISM is mmm... messy.

>I do look forward to the day that all of this is behind us and we can get on with the business of hangin’ out in the ethers.

d: I've given up my addiction to ether

>Meantime, thanks for playing.

d: no worries, I just needed to lower my expectations..


warm wishes,
david hartley 510.859.4050  
www.holistiq.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer

Appology

Eureka, Alchemy Godess, and Alex,
I believe that I owe you an appology. I noticed, after reading back over some of my writings in this string that I have focused my energy disproportionately on pointing out the differences in our viewpoints and not enough on the similarities. Although you could easily assume that I agree with you on many of the points that I don't refer to, I beleive that it is an oversight on my part to leave them unacknowledged. As much as I would like to mention each one specifically, I will opt to mention just the most salient few. Eureka, your consistent efforts and examples to maintain an atmosphere of mutual reverence and humility is exemplary. Alchemy Godess, your willingness to share your experiences honestly exhibits a vulnerability through which I believe many of us would find strength should we be so brave as to venture to such heights. Alex, you display a similar trust and vulnerability which I feel I have challenged most. I will work to rectify that. All of you portray for me the willingness to be honest with your experiences and perspectives. That in itself deserves my respect and reverence. I hope that you will not feel deterred from this conversation but intrigued and inspired by it. Eureka's headaches and Davids challenges are testimony to the pioneering spirit that has served much of humanity's progress in the cause of evolution. I pray that this be the seed of another such ascent.
David my friend, your style of communication has given me a whole new framework from which to grow. I am intrigued about where this thread will lead us and look forward to finding out. The luxury of time that I had to indulge myself into this conversation with has passed, but I hope to be able to share a thought or two each day.
Again, I hope that these exchanges have given all of us something to grow on even if it smells like humus, especially since that could mean that it's incredibly rich stuff.
With that I invite you all to keep the perspectives coming and David....

keep shoveling buddy, you may get somewhere yet.

In Gratitude,.

David

the impression that I get from you is that you are actually very close to being vegan but there is something there that really frightens you. Maybe fear of social rejection or some other inner conflict. Whatever it is this topic has really pushed a button for you. I'm glad that you are having fun with all of this and taking the time to absorb these thoughts. You may just make the move yet. I just want you to know that I'm routing for you and do let me know if there is any way that I can help when you do decide to drop your fears and "just do it".

Happy Blogging and thanks for the spell checking,

fear of

rhetoric.

Actually by this point it is closer to irritation.
As previously stated, I eat whatever I choose to eat, (which just happens to be a fair amount of vegan & vegetarian food, 80 - 90%) , have many (kind & non-proselytizing) vegan friends whose commitment to kindness and nonviolence as exemplified in non-violent communication with fellow humans.. stands in the most stark contrast to the violence & coercive techniques used by vegan cultists here, and have an urgent desire not to have some vegan proselytizers throw down paragraphs they've gotten out of books and then ask for a response for which they will refer to the next page in the book for more canned phrases to continue the party line program with.
My take on this website, and of human consciousness evolution has "ruthless honesty" as a self discipline. NEVER as an expression of/from enthronement of ego.
I look forward to the day when vegan militancy can be CALLED OFF in terms of the sort of proselytizing, and ad-hominem attacks witnessed here; CALLED OFF in terms of a coercive cult propaganda machine at the level of such as the immediate infiltration here of a group formed in Intentional Community
(where you can achieve little other than alienating and annoying people who might otherwise be at least somewhat sympathetic)..
and INSTEAD, take all the rhetoric and energy and direct it toward a useful goal, one which practically any even slightly evolved human might join you in, which is, of course taking on FACTORY FARMING.
I submit that to do less is cowardly & hypocritical, and to continue to annoy potential allies is a distraction which detracts from any useful or valuable work to which the cult of veganism might be usefully employed.


warm wishes,
david hartley 510.859.4050  
www.holistiq.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer

nonviolence = evolution

The one question that has been mostly avoided throughout this discussion is "Why is it okay for you to enslave and eat animals"? There have been no quality answers to that question. As far I can tell no one has watched the videos (beyond Eureka watching the beginning of Earthlings) that I presented with this topic, that I asked to be a prerequisite to the actual discussion. There has been a lot of irrational and childish commentary, again mostly avoiding the actual issue of the enslavement and killing of species other than our own. The fact is, there is no valid justification for the enslavement and murder of other animals. Some of you may react to that statement as an "ism", but in reality it is truth. There are no legitimate scientific health/dietary reasons, there are no ecological reasons and there are certainly no moral reasons. The truth remains that unnecessarily killing other sentient beings is wrong, something that many people who think they have come to some non-dualist "wisdom" often reject, believing they have a "higher" understanding of reality. The great deception, that is in fact impeding the evolution and progress of mankind, is that there are no superior principles (namely nonviolence) or truths in our world, "everyone has their own truth" & "to each their own". Unnecessary and uncaring violence is ALWAYS "justified" by deception, be that deception as to why humans need meat, or why we need to bomb the people of Iraq and Afghanistan (and Vietnam, etc. going back century by century). I expand on this in the following essay:
http://colindonoghue.wordpress.com/2008/10/16/eating-the-apple/

The reason I share films like Earthlings and Peaceable Kingdom is because that is REALITY, which can wake one up from a dream-deception that they are sleeping in. So rather than letting the slave master keep his slaves, let the bombs drop on the children and let the cows and pigs be tortured and killed, we can actually take a stand for truth, the scientific method, freedom and compassion. We can reject a 1984 reality where supposedly intelligent beings cant muster up basic compassion for other creatures, and instead eat their prepared animals flesh while sitting around a fire with there other supposedly intelligent and more evolved humans talking about "evolution" and 2012, while in the supposedly inferior animal world, indiscriminate violence and cruelty are hardly found at all.

The only legitimate concern in favor of humans being carnivores is that it's necessary for their health. This is what many people assume, it's what I used to assume. Then I became educated to the facts and now I know that's not true in any way. (Read "The China Study: The Most Comprehensive Study of Nutrition Ever Conducted" by T. Colin Campbell, PhD, et al, for starters if you actually want to educate yourself on the health facet).

Rationalize all you want, but when you actually have to account for your participation in the massive cruelty and mass-murder of other feeling beings, what is your defense? I've heard nothing other than things like "it's my choice" and "I think I felt better". If karma ends up being a part of our reality (as many people of different faiths along with many secularists, etc. believe it is), and all you have to argue is what has presented here so far, I doubt there will be much mercy given to you , just as you have shown no mercy to the animals. The Golden Rule remember?

Intelligence that ignores basic truths ends up being delusional and irrational. If we are all trying to EVOLVE here, what does that imply? It means we are are evolving from a lesser to a higher state. And what is lesser and what is higher? Unnecessary violence and oppression is lesser. Compassion and freedom is higher. Can we agree on that? Evolution necessitates judgment, otherwise there can be no progress, there would be nothing to progress from, just a static non-dualist state lacking any principle or meaning. Why do we prefer sustainability over ecological destruction? Because that causes less harm, because it is more sane. That is the same reasoning for adopting a vegan diet. I hope some of you will open your minds to these fundamentals and think twice before you participate in unnecessary violence, oppression and exploitation, that is bad for you, animals and our ecosystem.

And please don't leave any more comments until you have actually watched the videos! I created this discussion thread for commentary on the content of those videos, if you refuse to see what the reality is then how can you have an educated opinion on it? Perhaps you need a cartoon to start with?
http://meatrix.com/

Peace

omigoodness! I didn't

omigoodness! I didn't intend to find myself defending meat eating or cruelty or anything of that nature! I have heard T. Colin Campbell lecture, I've seen Peaceable Kingdom, and the Meatrix before, I think every living thing in this world, universe, multi- verse has a right to be itself. The human race has evolved quite a bit from drinking blood and hunter/ gatherer based diets. A plant-based diet is surely the way to go.

There is no justification for enslaving animals. But in the manner that I keep my pets, all different creatures can live together with the scenario of a care-taker, I see no issue with that, truly. A good friend of mine had gotten some chickens and a turkey and they live on her property happily, she feeds them, so they are always very happy to see her. She pets them, makes sure they are comfortable. Can a scenario like this exist? I don't think it's enslavement. There is an attachment there as well, and a sense of respect.

Factory Farming is enslavement, even on organic farms there is enslavement. I would love to end this, it's unsustainable and cruel. I always knew factory farming was bad, but when I really found out, it was worse than I thought. That certainly lead to my decision to become vegan/ 95% vegan.

As far as eating animals are concerned I will just reiterate my point that meat is only a vessel for consciousness. I plan on my body contributing to the nourishment of the Earth in death. I don't fear death, I don't think animals fear death. I could be wrong, and I don't mind being wrong, this is just my experience. Our attachment to bodies are egoic, but when we have them, we must respect them and treat them well, as well as the bodies of other creatures. I feel this is accomplished in my life. I don't need to convince anybody and I don't lie to myself. I question everything, because growth is not static.

So how do we accomplish a peaceable kingdom? We have so many passions that unite us, is this the goal of the discussion? In health counseling I work to promote plant-based diets, among other things! Client come to their own conclusions, but I find people really don't want to know about factory farming. I encourage them, if they wish to eat that way, I want it to be an informed choice, but if they need meat in their diet (which is their choice, not mine) to find a farmer's market, CSA, something of that nature. This is our power as consumers, voting with my fork. I've also become active with the local farmer's market creating an information campaign promoting local food, whole food, and a plant-based diet. This needs to be a grass roots movement and I can say that education without judgement is useful. I shared the Meatrix with my 6 year-old, and she was very distraught by it. I think it was too much for her, so instead I try to focus on what I DO want her to eat (more fruits, veg., etc.) because I changed and it has been a challenge to get the rest of the family on board! I've found it is important to respect this as a process, people are very attached to their food choices and take them personally.

On a personal note, I just want to say no worries, I don't get offended by things, my heart is too full of joy and warmth! I tried to put jokes aside and get serious for a change, working on my day off, dammit!

Love, light, good stuff-
what can we do in our communities to create constructive and sustainable change?

~going sane in a crazy world~
Alex

Offering

Hey Alex,
In case you think this would help you, I have a DVD of a whole bunch of short, cute clips most of which are designed for young kids. I think it would be a lot easier on you daughter if she got to see some light hearted, fun and informative cartoons rather than Meatrix. I agree that even the Meatrix is too harsh for a six year old. Let me know if you are interested.

Cheers,

Home

looking deeper

Alex, thanks for furthering the discussion in a constructive manner.
In reply to some of your points:
1) "...She pets them, makes sure they are comfortable. Can a scenario like this exist? I don't think it's enslavement."
I already responded to this idea in my previous comment title "Mother Nature...", please see that along with the link therein on Animal Rights vs. Animal Welfare. A slave-master that pets it's slave rather than whipping or beating him/her before killing and eating them, can be said to be a "nicer" slave-master, surely. The unaddressed question is whether that slavery is ethical to begin with. And as for you not thinking the cited example is slavery, it may be helpful to consider the definition of slave:
–noun
1. one who is the property of and wholly subject to another; a bond servant.
2. one entirely under the domination of some influence or person

Does that not apply to the given situation?

2)"...meat is only a vessel for consciousness. I plan on my body contributing to the nourishment of the Earth in death. I don't fear death, I don't think animals fear death."
Of course our bodies and the bodies of animals will contribute to the nourishment of the earth when we die, but you are not mentioning a BIG DIFFERENCE: are you currently enslaved by another species that is planning on killing and eating you? To focus on the dead body of a human or animal while ignoring the way in which that death happened is unsound. And you say you don't think animals fear death. This is obviously just an opinion, not based on any evidence. I suggest you watch Earthlings, or go to a factory farm, or start cutting a live animal and see what their reaction is yourself, you may change your mind.

I hope you will not take any of this personally, I am attempting only to look more deeply into the topic of discussion in the interest of getting as close to the truth as we can.

Peace

got a dictionary handy ?

>The one question that has been mostly avoided throughout this discussion is "Why is it okay for you to enslave and eat animals"?

d: The reason this is a NON-question is that it is predicated upon erroneous assmuptions of veganISM doctrine.
Family farms in which loving animal husbandry is practiced have been discussed in some detail;
the value of the labor of the willing farm animal is unquestionable on such sustainable small farms;
eating the meat of the animal is part of normal practice, has been for 100's of 1000's of years.
The fact that you do not think it is "okay" is clear.
What is unclear is why anyone should particularly CARE what you think, especially since you go to such astounding lengths to post ONLY ludirous veganISM mental masturbatory rhetoric.

>There have been no quality answers to that question.

d: Refer to the answer above and previous writing in this thread on family farms; if you'd like an even higher qualtiy answer, ask a quality question! As you persist in posing ludicrous rherotical questions, it is not possible to have a meaningful dialogue. Should someone be asking you "how old were you when you quit screwing the pooch?"

>As far I can tell no one has watched the videos (beyond Eureka watching the beginning of Earthlings) that I presented with this topic, that I asked to be a prerequisite to the actual discussion.

d: The videos you posted are KNOWN sources of false veganISM doctrine, and constitue a psychic/emotional attack.
Why should anyone purposefully subject themselves to such?
If anyone wants to see a horror flick there are PLENTY of them on myriad topics
Sounds like you need a job at veganISM high school, where you can hand out assigments and chide people for not doing the homework you assigned. You DO realize that this website & it's discussion areas are largely college age + / adult venues?

>There has been a lot of irrational and childish commentary,

d:AnthropomorphISM + veganISM is about as irrational and childish as it gets:
"oh, how COULD you.. you're frying up Bugs Bunny for dinner"

>again mostly avoiding the actual issue of the enslavement

d: oops: easily avoidable dictionary problem! get our your dictionary and read "slave"

>and killing of species other than our own.

d: good, at least you're not rattling on about cannabilistic baby consumption again,
and, of course, I'm sure you'd agree that killing species other than our own prior to eating them is far preferable than not doing so?

>The fact is, there is no valid justification for the enslavement and murder of other animals.

d: Dude, there is no jusifcation for your perversion & murder of the English language !
"When I use a word” Humpty Dumpty said, "...it means just what I choose it to mean-neither more nor less." (Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures)
Your Alice in Wonderland (il)logic is pervasive and persistent..
the fact is that you are an endless fountain of redundantly repetitive ridiculous rhetoric
erroneously phrased as if it made any sense outside of your own very fringe veganISM doctrine.

>Some of you may react to that statement as an "ism", but in reality it is truth.

d: Get ahold of yourself, son ... "in reality" .. truth is manifold, and no one...
perhaps least of all: someone deeply lost in the grasp of a cultish doctrine
has any necessarily useful truth.
You claim to be expounding "truth" yet I am seeing merely a relentless PROPAGANDA campaign.
The father of modern propaganda Nazi, leader Joseph Goebbels said:
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."
You seem to be convinced of Goebbels statement; in any case every bit that you have posted
REEKS of a pre-manufactured propagand campaign, and you have YET to take part in any dialogue
(as in, use the standard English language definitions, check your Alice in Wonderland logic at the door)

>There are no legitimate scientific health/dietary reasons,

d: That is a lie.

>there are no ecological reasons and there are certainly no moral reasons.

d: the sustainable ecological practice of a small / family farm has been time-tested for many generations;
the morality which I see as problematical in this discussion is the intensively and well thought out campaign of propaganda lies.
Attempted psychological manipulaton is not dialogue. Stop it already.

>The truth remains that unnecessarily killing other sentient beings is wrong,

d: the truth remains that you have a fixed cultish veganISM propaganda campaign running; thus anything which you utter which MIGHT otherwise have even some tiny shred of truth is extremely suspect.

>something that many people who think they have come to some non-dualist "wisdom" often reject, believing they have a "higher" understanding of reality.

d: well, if you're asking me to help you get deprogrammed, I can probably help you. Here, try a little tea with some honey, and we'll talk about it.

>The great deception, that is in fact impeding the evolution and progress of mankind, is that there are no superior principles (namely nonviolence) or truths in our world, "everyone has their own truth" & "to each their own".

d: Whatever. YOUR great deception consists of a persistant and pervasive propaganda campaign, replete with skewing dictionary definitions to suit your manipulative writings.

>Unnecessary and uncaring violence is ALWAYS "justified" by deception,

d: ALWAYS is always suspect, and this statement is additional plain stupid; unnecessary and uncaring violence is done daily in a thousand ways without any recourse to deception.

>be that deception as to why humans need meat,

d: sorry ? Certainly not all humans need meat. It is a proven fact, however that eating meat is a fabulous cure for the otherwise incurable mental aberration of vegan cultism.. why in this thread alone, we may refer to roughly 40% of the population (of this thread) being CURED of vegan cultism by taking animal protein. Sit down here for a sec, have some of this tea...

>or why we need to bomb the people of Iraq and Afghanistan (and Vietnam, etc. going back century by century).

d: I don't know why you need to bomb anyone... but you certainly show no signs of slowing down with your rhetoric carpet bombing..

>I expand on this in the following essay:
http://colindonoghue.wordpress.con/2008/10/16/eating-the-apple/

d: I'll pass for now, but thanks, I'm sure.

>The reason I share films like Earthlings and Peaceable Kingdom is because that is REALITY,

d: the reason you attempt to subject people to films like Earthlings and Peaceable Kingdom is because they are the SHOCK & AWE desert storm bombing of people's consciousness; psychic violence as the thin ege of the wedge of indoctrination into cultish veganISM. Whatever REAL abuse befalls animals during your filming is unforgiveable. Using it the way that you do is equally unforgiveable. Instead of wasting your time harassing evolving individauls who
a) have low tolerance for cults
b) dislike being chided for not watching the movie homework
c) have the ability so see thru your doctrine, and of course pity you, but are helpless to save you from it (unless you want to sit down & have a nice cup of tea with some honey.. & we can talk about your problems..)
Seriously: re-craft your campaign. Smooth it out a bit, so the jagged edges of the propagand aren't QUITE so obvious.
THEN: Take it where it'll do some good- and that is where you may have some effect on FACTORY FARMING.
Everyone here is likely already aware of the horrors of factory farming.
Everyone here is surely already aware that no one but cultish veganISM doctrinarians claim that loving family farms are anything other than highly commendable sustainable agriculture.

>which can wake one up from a dream-deception that they are sleeping in.

d: Speaking of dream deception.. have a little of this tea .. it'll help you !

>So rather than letting the slave master keep his slaves,

d: strike that comment ---- anthropomorphISM

>let the bombs drop on the children and let the cows and pigs be tortured and killed,

d: carpet bombing is defintely hard on children, cows, pigs, etc.
this cultish veganISM carpet bombing rhetoric is only psychologically damaging, provided that people receive the antidote in time (won't you just have a little of this tea...)

>we can actually take a stand for truth,

d: I'm not at all convinced that you can. Certainly you seem not to have a grasp of the relativity of truth, definitely-- you are in the grasp of a delusion which prevents you from accessing the truth that non veganISM uncultists know.

>the scientific method, freedom and compassion. We can reject a 1984 reality where supposedly intelligent beings cant muster up basic compassion for other creatures, and instead eat their prepared animals flesh while sitting around a fire with there other supposedly intelligent and more evolved humans talking about "evolution" and 2012, while in the supposedly inferior animal world, indiscriminate violence and cruelty are hardly found at all.

d: you are so freakin out of touch with reality it is not even funny (ok, a little but funny) but SAD!
No wonder you were such easy meat for the veganISM cult machine.
Here's your movie assignment: go to youtube, find and watch 10 videos on wild animals killing other wild animals.
We evolved humans prefer to kill animals in humane and cruelty-free fashion, with no indiscriminate violence in the mix.

>The only legitimate concern in favor of humans being carnivores is that it's necessary for their health.

d: Bullshit. Free range grass fed family farmed beef is YUMMY ! I mean it is juicy good :-)

>This is what many people assume, it's what I used to assume. Then I became educated

d: HAhaha .. you "became educated" .. You are a freakin' drive by shooting victim of the cultish veganISM propaganda machine.
(the probably got their hooks into you while you were suffering from animal protein deficiency.)

>to the facts and now I know that's not true in any way. (Read "The China Study: The Most Comprehensive Study of Nutrition Ever Conducted" by T. Colin Campbell, PhD, et al, for starters if you actually want to educate yourself on the health facet). Rationalize all you want, but when you actually have to account for your participation in the massive cruelty and mass-murder of other feeling beings, what is your defense?

d: Dude, you are participating in the massive cruelty and mass-murder of humans every day in which you waste your effin' time harping on with the cultish veganISM machine instead of doing something actually useful like activism against corporate rule, and the multiple wars on humanity which are daily carried out in its name.

>I've heard nothing other than things like "it's my choice" and "I think I felt better".

d: Try this one: It is just none of your effin' business.

>If karma ends up being a part of our reality (as many people of different faiths along with many secularists, etc. believe it is), and all you have to argue is what has presented here so far, I doubt there will be much mercy given to you , just as you have shown no mercy to the animals.

d: Great now the runnerboy for the veganISM movie psychogical attack machine is a holy man. What next.

>The Golden Rule remember?

d: he who has the gold, rules .. yah, we see it in action every day .. and SOMEday when you get your head outta your navel perhaps you can join the mainstream of evolving humans who are concerned with ending FACTORY FARMING and who won't even mind that you are stuffed so full of judgment that it reeks out of every sentence you post. C'mon sit down, have a cup of tea, and we'll work something out.

>Intelligence that ignores basic truths ends up being delusional and irrational.

d: damn. out of the mouths of babes.. Son, lets sit with this a minute.
'kay that's long enough. So, what I hear you saying is that the delusion and irrationality of cults (in general) is not necessarily based in their lack of intelligence, but is in their ignoring of basic truths. Ok, but then by "basic truths" we're talking about the stuff which the (for instance veganISM) cult has ignored ? Like using common English language instead of Alice in Wonderland anthropomorphism ? But what about the fact that the cultish veganISM rhertoric army studiously uses psy-op propaganda tactics? Doesn't that go way beyond the pale in terms of attributing their delusion and irrationalitly to mere ignorance of basic truths ?!

>If we are all trying to EVOLVE here, what does that imply?

d: FIRST requirment: Get over the egotistic self infatuation. You have an opinion, state it as so.
Dialogue in any even slightly "evolved" venue is going to require you to GET THE eff off of the constant propaganda.
Act like a thinking and feeling human being rather than a machine programmed to spit out cultish veganISM doctrine.

>It means we are are evolving from a lesser to a higher state. And what is lesser and what is higher?

d: IF you have any clue THEN you are a complete hypocrite, as propagandizing is diametrically antithetical to evolution.
I will, therefore, continue to try to pretend you are merely programmed & so clueless.

>Unnecessary violence and oppression is lesser.

d: Psy-op propaganda collapses this distinction nicely, by bridging the two..

>Compassion and freedom is higher. Can we agree on that?

WORD ! I think we may be able to use you in our anti FACTORY FARM campaigns .. have a seat.. try some of this tea?

>Evolution necessitates judgment,

d: danger will robinson .. don't go off half-cocked..

>otherwise there can be no progress, there would be nothing to progress from,
.... (.......) where's the beef ?

>just a static non-dualist state lacking any principle or meaning.

d: d'ya mean to tell me that without a fixation on judgment and progress there would only be nirvana?
that's pretty deep.

>Why do we prefer sustainability over ecological destruction? Because that causes less harm, because it is more sane.

d: why do I feel like this is a rope-a-dope move ..

>That is the same reasoning for adopting a vegan diet.

d: ah.. of course.. another little rhetoric trick. Dude, you need new speech writers, and I've got just the guys, we'll whip up a psy-op campaign that'll fry the brains of those FACTORY FARM buying supersizers right in their skulls .. here , sit down & have a cup of tea..

>I hope some of you will open your minds to these fundamentals and think twice before you participate in unnecessary violence, oppression and exploitation, that is bad for you, animals and our ecosystem.

d: Son, you are preachin' to the choir. Your message needs a little polishing though, as it pretty much attacks around 90% of the people who might otherwise be your allies in working against FACTORY FARMS, which are the undeniable source of the sort of problems which have driving you over the edge and into the clutches of the cultish veganISM machine.

>And please don't leave any more comments until you have actually watched the videos! I created this discussion thread for commentary on the content of those videos, if you refuse to see what the reality is then how can you have an educated opinion on it? Perhaps you need a cartoon to start with? http://matrix.com/

d: get a grip.

d: Peace


warm wishes,
david hartley 510.859.4050  
www.holistiq.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer

Because I'm a lover not a fighter!

And judgement negates evolution and limits progress...
how about we unite on the fact that we all agree factory farming is on the far end of the spectrum of evil, for the animals, the environment, the economy, public health, the farmers. What shall we do about it?

I can say I have gotten some people to eat less meat, I've also gotten some people completely off of factory farmed meat. I've had a lot of success with aligning myself with the farmer's market, and accentuating the positives of eating an organic, local, plant based diet. I entice people with vegan chocolate pudding and chocolates, quinoa salads, stir- frys with local veggies and herbs. My aim is to use love not fear. It's important to know the truth, but when people feel attacked, their defenses go up, it's better to be all about making good health fun and inviting.

Home, you mention a DVD, I would be interested, because the truth is, kids love animals so much, but they also love fast food. It was a big deal for us to stop ordering out, or getting Wendy's, when other kids in the neighborhood live on that stuff. My daughter feels left out, but I don't want her to make her friends feel bad either. It's tricky. So when I had seen the Meatrix, I thought that was tame enough, but then sitting through halfway, I shut it off because I didn't want to do that to her. I want her to understand but I don't want to put fear in her. I know a lot of people who use fear tactics on their kids, and it keeps them from eating chemical food, but it causes a weird unhealthy thing, causing them to be judgmental of others, and that creates a barrier, the "us and them" thing. And, I have that to a certain degree, but I don't want to perpetuate it. I'm experimenting with ways of doing that.
Anyway, thankfully, there are many good reasons not eat fast food! So we talked, and I think she gets it, although she is still influenced by others, I can't help that to certain degree.

What are some other things we can do in the community? Again, I feel this is more successful if viewed as a process and done in a loving and respectful way. If we can't learn to love and understand the overweight pimply rude guy who eats big macs, hold the lettuce, then our work here isn't done, now is it?

Btw, Home, I don't know where you live, but it sounds great! I could use a waterfall in my back yard!

Take care guys, and play nice!

Alex