Reflections on TZM
- Login or register to post comments
- Print this page
W'sup.
I just wanted to get a feel for others' current views on The Zeitgeist Movement as it exists right now.
I was exposed to the movement in 2008 and joined in 2009 (roughly), and have followed it closely ever since. Upon moving from Texas to Hawaii in January, 2010, I joined the Hawaii Zeitgeist Chapter, only to find that it was extremely inactive/dead, which sorta sucked, but oh well.
Anyway, that is beside the point. My hopes for TZM have been fading as of late. Perhaps it was the (in my opinion) unsuccessful/lackluster ZDay that just passed us by. As I browse the Zeitgeist forums, which I try to do at least a couple times each week, I notice that a large amount of ZM'ers subscribe to the notion that Fresco is God and Peter Joseph is his prophet. Don't get me wrong, I greatly admire these two individuals, as well as Roxanne Meadows. I guess what I am trying to say, in a very disorganized and ranting sort of way, is that The Zeitgeist Movement has a very nice goal in mind, but no real means of getting there, and an unfortunately large amount of its members seem to be more interested in watching the fall of society and looking to those mentioned above to hold their hand and guide them, all the while rejecting totally all ideas that do not conform to the scientific/technology-based society that they wish to see come to fruition. I just feel like the world is moving faster and faster each day and TZM is having an increasingly difficult time in keeping up. Any thoughts?
Comments
Agreed
Namaste RyanAnne, thank you so much for your input!
I agree that the Movement isn't as active as I'd like to see it. The Movement seems to like to boast about how many people we have signed up on the main webpage, but I think that many fail to realize the very things that you have talked about. Many people are "a member of the Movement", but few are active.
Only until recently did I begin to get involved in my local Chapter. I found it to be very inactive - no response from State coordinator, broken website,etc. So recently I, along with a few other local members, have started to attempt to build something. I would suggest that you get into contact with your State Coordinator, and if there isn't one (I know that there's a long list of openings on the Forum), talk to Jen (US Coordinator) about becoming one. Email me at kitaki2crows@gmail.com and I can give you her address.
Another helpful thing is to get signed up with the Google Groups mailing list. I just recently began to listen in on meetings on Teamspeak 3. I don't have a mic to be fully involved, but I can type my input into the chat room. Here's past US Chapter Meetings: http://zeitgeistuniversity.com/USMeetings.html
I think that the Movement is polarizing a little as of recently. Some (too many) blindly follow Peter and Fresco, and are largely inactive. These same people do not research the information on their own, but are spoon fed and in turn spit it back out - in the end, they just annoy most of the public and turn them off the The Zeitgeist Movement all together. Then there is a group (who I have found to be the most active) building within the Movement that are getting pretty tired of sitting around and just talking. Many are ready to actually do something.
Although I do agree that we need to focus on spreading information to people who haven't a clue that society is falling apart - I don't think we need to jump into "building a city" just yet either. That's why I love Evolver, it covers so many different topics for change, and most are locally focused. I think that we are at a tipping point in society, and although I agree with The Zeitgeist Movement in most of what it stands for, The Venus Project is not going to be the ONLY thing that will save humanity. I feel that this is a big problem with The Zeitgeist Movement, many have their blinders on.
Neil runs V-Radio (v-radio.org), he is a spokesperson for The Venus Project. I feel that his radio show is FAR more beneficial than Peter's Radio Address. Neil has had guests on his show from so many different organizations and backgrounds. And that's what we need to create change.
I feel that the Venus Project is an amazing concept to be as a goal marker. The reality is, we won't see that society for many generations down the line. We need to focus on real world applications of a transition to a society similar to what is proposed by The Venus Project.
Thats a major problem I have with Peter's vocabulary throughout his Radio Shows. He notes "transition" as if it were the next "phase" on the agenda. Transition is HERE NOW. We need to be looking everywhere and to connect as many dots as possible.
---Here's one such example: http://earthship.org/. "Garbage Warrior" is an amazing documentary about how these homes came into creation.
---Open Source Ecology (http://openfarmtech.org/index.php/Main_Page) is another group of folks working towards real change. Neil had them on V-Radio, which was an awesome episode.
---Douglas Malette is an engineer that works on the space shuttle program that recently joined The Zeitgeist Movement. Neil also had him on a recent V-Radio show. Douglas is talking to Fresco and Roxanne about using The Venus Project's 503 non-profit to help back his project - automated hydroponic food production systems.
Obviously, we all do not have the option of getting off the grid and into a alternative energy production. And many of us are not engineers. I feel that we all have to try to change SOMETHING. My wife and I are trying a garden this year. We tried once before, and failed. I figured, why not try again. I guess what I'm getting at is that I think The Movement has been quite stagnant, but things are developing. We need to get more localized, and get less dependent on Peter and Fresco.
two posts I made related to this
I agree with a lot of what both of you say! I have good news for you:
there is a guy here in Vienna who is developing a project management software soon available to the whole Zeitgeist Movement, where people can start their own projects, communicate, etc =)
Here a post I made related to your points in the Zeitgeist forum right after Z-Day:
http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_kunena&f...
"I heard Peter Joseph mentioning that they had some technical problems on Z-Day in NY.
Well, in Vienna there where some technical problems too, specifically with the projector which was going to used to show us films. At the same time the general atmosphere was laying quite clear in the air:
no one had come to the meeting to watch any more films, but to meet each other: to speak and to listen to one another.
So I suggested that we sit down in a circle, and that everyone present themselves and shortly summarize why they had come to the meeting. It became a fantastic, and very inspiring evening which most certainly will lead to great projects for the movement =)
I became speaker of the Vienna Chapter on that evening, which I am very happy about: there are so many great people involved here, and the basic ideas of the Venus Project are just my cup of tea - so I hope to remain inside this movement. But for me to stay involved I know that I personally need this to be a flourishing arena for visions of the future - open to new ideas and individual initiatives - an organisation which is ready to catch up with people, letting every individual be a part of further developing the common goals. I think that we are many in this movement who for example have amazing ideas on social design which would fit well with the general aspects of the Venus Project. For them to be integrated properly there needs to be a feeling of more openness as well as an outspoken interest for such contributions.
It is important that we remain on the same track, and the ideas and visions presented in The Venus Project and the Zeitgeist Films are the very spark of all this, and a good basis for us all. Yet, although the material is very impressive, I think it is almost absurd to assume that all aspects of this fantastic possibility for change into a better future has been considered by Peter Joseph, Jacques Fresco and Roxanne Meadows, neither do they seem to think so. But according to my humble opinion I can sense quite some defensiveness from these three initiators of this movement, as well as from certain other characters in this forum: a certain attitude of "we have the answers and anyone who questions our ideas just have not understood everything yet". This is a very dangerous attitude...
I think that we all have experience how difficult it is to spread new ideas, and it is easy to develop a defensive attitude when you have been trying for a while. But let us avoid this attitude inside this movement - we are all here to reach the same goals anyway!
Generally I salute that we keep to the same goals, but I hope that cooperation and above all decentralisation will be the guide lines for further development of this movement:
lets really make the best use we can of the main resource that we have at the moment - the human resource!
Susan Florries
speaker of the Vienna Chapter (although the content of this post are my personal opinions)
florries.wordpress.com"
HERE ANOTHER POST which I made today here on Evolver =)
http://www.evolver.net/user/daniel_pinchbeck/blog/critique_zeitgeist_mov...
bless!
susan
Bravo
I loved your comments. It is truly time to together as a united front where everyones guiness is considered. Thanks for the post.
it's already happening!
Susan,
Cooperation and decentralization are the main purpose of TZM.
Just because PJ and JF are at the foreground of the movement, does not mean they control all aspects of what occur.
You should listen in on an international meeting on teamspeak. If you want instructions, email me at cdrnation@yahoo.com
Thought I'd drop my
Thought I'd drop my commentary. I listen to the weekly address by Peter and started listening to Neil's V-Radio. I work with my iphone on podcasts all day which is a luxury as far as being able to listen to that much talk. Actually it makes me wish Evolver had a podcast. But back to the subject,
I've been feeling that both Peter and Jacque are a bit too rationale and scientific method based which is in itself not always a bad thing but to reject spirituality to the extent they do I find disheartening and alienating. Personally I think they could benefit to integrate gnosticism and permaculture design into their knowledge base. The way they've answered questions in these areas has really indicated they don't know much about the new information being given in both these areas. I suspect the same for the movement itself. For me, it all integrates quite well. If I had the time I would seek a way to synergize them in some presentation.
Gnosis for those who don't know, essentially is the origin of spiritual consciousness on the planet which has been the root of all the religions but also suppressed and kept hidden until now. The knowledge coming forward in this era is unprecedented. It gives a notion of how "intellectual animals", that's all of us alive, can become harmonized beings who don't destroy their home planet. Not just a notion but a science to approaching this. The Zeitgeist films almost got to these roots but didn't dig deep enough. They showed the similarities in the archetypes but didn't get to the point of how they present a path of inner development that serves humanity. The religious organizations themselves I agree are corrupted and blanched of nutrients but the esoteric heart of them has yet to be understood by the layperson or for that matter theologians or professors in universities unless they know the hidden doctrines. I know for anyone who hasn't unearthed this info this will sound a bit much but as an Evolver I have to say, Gnostics were the original Evolvers of humanity.
As for Permaculture Design, the Zeitgeist Movement has failed to take hold onto the largest solution to the sustainability question the Earth has going at this time. Any member of the Z Movement who doesn't look deeply into Permaculture is surely missing out on some immediate term solutions that are likely happening already somewhere within range of them. Responsible use of technology has ever been a part of Permaculture design practices.
Anyways, my 2 cents...I still am interested in the Z Movement but agree, let's see it get unhinged from the Venus Project and see some immediate action. If I were to consider the groups in town for the upcoming Localized Resiliency Spore the Zeitgeist group would unfortunately not be on the list. I did have them for the Spore on Gift Economy and gave it a push there. Out of the intellectual arena and into action. There are many people wanting a game plan for when the shit hits the fan.
Gnosis
You can't get everyone to agree on spirituality. If you force Gnosis, or any other type of belief on someone.. you are no better than any religion. TVP allows everyone to freely believe as they wish.
Permaculture is wonderful. It's nature. But automating permaculture would be a very difficult task. We should definitely restore the Earth with permaculture, but as a system to feed humanity.. other approaches would be much more beneficial for everyone.
What a great discussion! I
What a great discussion! I totally agree with all of you. We all need to unite and find a point of agreement on which we can begin to actually do something, such as build our own off-the-grid communities.
Great together but apart
I am also very happy about this discussion - and about all you interesting people I have met through it =)
It is good to talk about this! We of course need all kinds of movements right now, and it is just good that they are different since people are different.
Sobey wrote here above: "I've been feeling that both Peter and Jacque are a bit too rationale and scientific method based which is in itself not always a bad thing but to reject spirituality to the extent they do I find disheartening and alienating."
and I agree totally. We "spirituals" just have to be careful not to do the same thing back...
I think that it is good that TZM does not have an agenda for spiritual evolution, since such a program could be alienating for people who would otherwise join this movement. At the same time the TZM "leaders" seem overly afraid of being associated with anything spiritual, and in TZM-forums speakers of the Venus Project can come out with sayings like "I know for a fact that prayer brings nothing at all", which is such a completely un-scientific thing to say that I do not even want to get started on it =)
At the same time I have seen other comments saying things like "technical solutions will give nothing without spiritual evolution", and I am not so sure about that - TVP has a point in saying that in providing people with what they need, they can better go on with their own spiritual evolution if they like to.
None of the current existing movements that I know of really stand for what I think, but I am a very happy, even exited member of TZM and Evolver anyway. To sum up my POW:
To not scare off anyone who wants to evolve this society we do need to unite, but not too fast - better keep these different movements just that - different! The members of the movements will stand for the inter-connectivity, and in the best case we can manage to keep a respectful and creative/constructive conversation going with each other. And what is to say that we cannot organize in-common events and actions just because some members of one organisation think different than some of those of the other one. In the end we all want more or less the same thing:
a society where peace and love - thus also humans and other beings - can flourish =)
Susan, I believe that we're
Susan, I believe that we're very much on the same wavelength. The bottom line is that nothing and nobody is perfect, and we all need to make an effort to listen to each other. I've been involved in leftist movements that frown up spirituality, and I know how alienating it is. However, I also know that Zeitgeist has attracted many different people of many different beliefs, not just hard-core atheists. I think it's great that ESM came along because it fills a certain void. I've always said that we need revolutionary theory to unite with spirituality. I think of myself as somewhat of a "spiritual anarchist," you could say. I've always felt out of place in spiritual groups who don't want to talk about politics, and political groups who don't want to talk about spirituality.
I think part of our weakness is in the fact that we've been unable to unite our socially conscious side with our spiritual side. Many people who are into spirituality have little understanding of how things in the world actually operate, and many people who do understand the ins and outs of global imperialism haven't a clue about spirituality and haven't had any direct experience beyond the physical world. We're like two halves of a brain who can't come together to form a whole brain. It's crippling us. The ruling elite, however, have their agenda and their own dark connection with the spiritual world perfectly in line, which is one reason why they're so much more powerful than us right now, in my view. What I love about Daniel Pinchbeck and Evolver is the fact that they are breathing spiritual life into the revolutionary left.
However, it's not enough to just talk about spirituality and meditate. We're dealing with real physical forces here, and we do have to DO something at some point. I also have a visceral disagreement with statements such as "technical solutions will give nothing without spiritual evolution," although I hear these types of statements all the time. Really? Giving everyone on Earth a decent quality of life wouldn't do any good, wouldn't count for anything? Most people who are sitting around pondering "spiritual evolution" are people who are living quite privileged lives compared to most people in the world. Many people in the world do not even have basic things like food, clothing, shelter, clean running water, etc. Much of the world lives on less than $1 a day. How much do you spend in a day? How much do I spent in a day? I don't think we even realize how privileged we are. This point of privilege, fused with a lack of knowledge, fused with "spirituality," can create a view of the world that can sound very enlightened but that is quite nonthreatening to the status quo and quite impractical in terms of accomplishing anything.
Here's something I wrote on Facebook, and something that a person wrote in response. I'll refer to her as "New Age Girl":
Me: "I have something to say today! You say that you create reality with your mind, right? But yet, when I talk about living in a world without government, without militaries, without a monetary system, and without war, you say it isn't possible! You say, 'We have to have a government/military/monetary system. There's no other way.' So you don't really believe what you say!"
New Age Girl: "I personally could do without these systems, but I accept there is a lot of good in them, even tho that could be hard to see sometimes. everything everything everything has a positive and negative function. There isn't anything wrong with money, its how we use it. there isn't anything wrong with the military, its how we use it. etc.. and how we use what we have, creates Peace, or it creates War.
These things 'we' want to get rid of are merely symptoms of a deeper dis-ease. Until the healing of that dis-ease is made the primary focus, we will just replace this for that, and end up in the same place. ... See More
A perfect example...take all the money, military toys, etc away...Israel and Palestine will war. They will continue to war until each side gives up the story, acknowledges their OWN trespasses, forgive eachother, and begin to trust. take away all the special interest in world, you will still find gender discrimination, racial discrimination, religious discrimination, etc.. In other words, until we heal, our own hurt will continue to create dis-ease in some form or another."
Perhaps she made some good points. But obviously, she doesn't understand the systemic nature of the world, and most people don't. The war between Israel and Palestine is fueled by the imperialistic interests of the U.S. Without those interests, without a military, and without military toys, there wouldn't be massive numbers of people systemically killed on a daily basis, both there and around the world. But people just don't get it, because all their lives the truth has been hidden from them. Our own hearts have been blamed for all the problems of the world. We blame our own minds. We bought into the story of "original sin" and how we are fundamentally bad.
New Age Girl talks about peace, love and healing. Yet she says, "there isn't anything wrong with the military, its how we use it." If we are peaceful people, healed of our hurts and full of love, then what use do we have with a military? What good is all this talk of spiritual transformation if we can't even ponder the idea of changing things on a physical level? Are some people afraid to let go of the military? Are they afraid that there are people in the world who might come for revenge, who might come to take what's theirs? Are they really ready to make those changes within themselves, and those changes in their way of life, that need to be made for the good of all mankind? Are we?
This can't just be a mental exercise or a spiritual exercise. We have to stop supporting the system. Period. That means radically changing how we live, and letting go of a lot of our luxuries, at least for now. Advanced, sustainable technology like the kind presented in TVP won't be able to flourish until the system has been brought--or has fallen--to its knees.
Sobey brought up a complaint about TZM that I have heard a few times now. He said that they're not really into the idea of permaculture, local farming, etc. That makes absolutely no sense to me. Fresco talked about the fact that agriculture could be performed by machines, which I believe is true. A lot of it is already done by machines, even precise things like picking the tassels off the tops of corn stalks. However, he clearly states that in his vision, farming is completely organic and done at a local level. Each little community has its own little farm where every person has access to fresh organic food.
To me, the first logical step toward this type of world is to begin doing the farming ourselves. Also, producing our own food is the first logical step toward reducing our dependence on federal reserves notes (money). Our dependence on federal reserve notes is what keeps us trapped in the system, keeps us perpetuating it. I'm not saying that we just form a commune. I'm saying that we form an international system of people who live off the grid (or as much as possible), and who bring more and more people into this system, which will be decentralized and self-organizing.
If it's true that the Z people don't want to get into local farming or permaculture, then that's too bad because that's the one thing I think we should all be doing together! But somehow, I think that's not true for everybody in TZM.
thinking along the same lines
Bodie - we do most definitely think along the same lines =)
On one level I agree with "New-Age"-girl that you describe at the same time as I agree with you - basically, I think that to heal for example the Israel-Palestine conflict one has work on healing the people there at the same time as we bring down the worlds political elite, amongst other things. Most of all I think that generally, a variety of approaches is often the most fruitful option.
I do totally agree with this:
"I also have a visceral disagreement with statements such as "technical solutions will give nothing without spiritual evolution," although I hear these types of statements all the time. Really? Giving everyone on Earth a decent quality of life wouldn't do any good, wouldn't count for anything?"
Just like you, I find it so essential that we remain open to the different solutions that these movements provide, and to whatever other ideas/structures might grow out of this -
- like I said in another post here on the forum: NEITHER EVOLVER NOR ZEITGEST KNOW WHAT KIND OF MOVEMENTS THEY ARE YET! Most of us do not even know who we ourselves are yet, even less how the future we are all dreaming of evolving will look like. So the most important thing that these movements do now is that they gather people who want change/evolution, and who are ready to work for it - and facilitate that work through meetings, forums, project management and exchange systems, etc. Let people met and just DO - no matter if it is technical or spiritual solutions that they want to provide.
Coincidentally I just read the following sentence on http://lightworker.com : "May Lamberton Becker, in her introduction to Pinocchio, quotes the philosopher Benedetto Croce, who said that the "wood out of which Pinocchio is carved is humanity itself." This reminds us that all human beings make mistakes as we struggle to fulfil our greatest dreams... We should all remember this, and face the effort of balancing proper organisation and common goals with openness and creativity."
Further, I very, very much agree with this point you make:
"I'm saying that we form an international system of people who live off the grid (or as much as possible), and who bring more and more people into this system, which will be decentralized and self-organizing."
To me this means that at same time as we start with overall, international systems/ideas we should make space for smaller, regional systems and inspiring/leaving it open for individuals (or small groups within the larger group) to provide new ideas and ways of exchange.
In Vienna, where I live, local farming and bio-foods are huge movements as it is, and buying really good foods is quite affordable. Besides from that, the tap-water is excellent. Starting with my own food production feels a bit out of place here. Much more I feel the importance of working on the self-empowerment of people - there is a huge need of this, amongst other things since the imagined guilt and the real pain of history is very heavy on people here, for obvious reasons, and hinder them to love themselves and thus of course also one another. I am not saying that Austrians somehow need self-improvement more than others, more that they are very open to it since their wounds are so "open", in a lack of a better word.
Learning self improvement and self healing techniques is usually expensive, and someone like me can do a lot in providing for example healing, meditation coaching, group management and event organisation in exchange for whatever others can give me or the movements. If we then promote this within all the movements we are involved in, we will inter-connect the movements and thus people - and the system of international exchange will develop naturally, maybe in ways which we cannot even start to understand yet.
On TZM- members possibly being reluctant to get active locally:
I do sometimes have the impression that parts of the TZM members might have been a bit too focused on only The Venus Projects future existence, and not being very active in other, social improvement work "right here, right now" - with the argument that it would be inefficient, since no real change can take place under the political system that we are in. This is just an impression, and does of course not go for all members, and besides, it seems to be changing rapidly, as many people realize that TVP will just gain from this. Some people in TZM can of course also stay completely focused on TVP, but my strong opinion is that TZM should remain open for people who also want to work with other, related issues locally and not work directly for the development of TVP.
If we, as much as we can, are the change that we want to see in society we will not just improve the society around us NOW, but also inspire people to join either TZM or Evolver or another movement - and that is all good!
With all this said, I want to add that I am very open to contributing with other things than healing, group management or process coaching - whatever turns out to be appropriate =)
TZM
TZM itself is not going to get involved in small-scale operations. There are other organizations that exist that are trying to do these things though.
TZM is a world-wide movement. My small garden in Pennsylvania will not feed starving kids in Africa.
That being said.. many people in TZM are creating gardens, getting off the grid, and trying to find sustainable ways to live within their community. Many people in TZM are interested in these things for obvious reasons. But TZM cannot focus on this.. it would be way too time-consuming. TZM is global and cannot stray from it's intended purpose.
Well Put!
I also find it humorous that many "new-agers" have such a fear of getting rid of governments and the military. They're so capable of talking the talk of "one love," in fact it often becomes egotistical.. and that if you don't believe what they believe, that you are somehow beneath them. Perhaps if all these people started walking the walk, the military would crumble.
The reason TVP doesn't want to get involved in local farming is because once the system collapses.. these places will be instant targets. We really do need a global change for any change to occur.
what the Zeitgeist Movement actually is, and why it's important.
The Zeitgeist Movement is not what most people, even many people in the Movement, thinks it is. It is not a 'force' for change, or a 'force' of any kind. It is not an organization for political change, or a protest group, or a religious group, and it is definitely not an economic enterprise. To understand it, people have to step outside their usual ways of thinking, and resist the urge to pigeonhole it in some previous 'category' of any kind. Nothing like it has ever existed before, and the concepts are totally new, something not previously thought of by anyone.
The Zeitgeist Movement is not Jacque or Roxanne's ideas of it, nor Peter's ideas or anyone else, including mine. It is something new, with the goal clear, but how to bring it about very unclear. But I will try to explain my view of it.
This idea that we are going to bring it about is part of the mistake of our culture... we don't understand the natural forces of social dynamics. We know the direction of social sanity, but the task of becoming socially sane seems like pie in the sky.
That's understandable, right?
Some think it's crazy to dismiss modern ideas of spirituality, but the fact is, we don't know what is possible, nor what will happen in the future. Nobody does. We do know from science what is happening to our world, we know about the Mass Extinction Event Humanity is producing on the planet. We hear every day about the insanity of violence and starvation in a world of plenty, the wars of organized people killing and destroying other organized people. We taste the fear, the confusion, and the grasping at finding some 'cause' for this insanity. We sense that something larger than our egos has a tight grip on the society, and some like this, some reject this, and some hate because of this.
So conspiracy theories abound, people grasp at anything which is different than what they know has failed in their own culture, studying ancient and foreign cultures, religions, and mystical spirituality. For most, it has almost nothing whatsoever to do with their day to day lives. For a few, who take it to extremes, they find themselves justifying all kinds of stuff they knew was insane before they went to those extremes.
Then along comes the Zeitgeist Movement. It seems formless, based upon personality worship of a few people it is forming around, like Peter and Jacque and Roxanne. But some of us sense it is far more than a few people or even a few ideas.
When a species finds itself in an environment without predators, it tends to overpopulate, eat up all the food, and die back massively. It can even become extinct in that place. We are quite aware that this could happen to Humanity.
For such a species, without intelligence, the curve up and back down is not something it has the senses or abilities to do anything about. But we do. We are not like the other species on this planet... we can see what is happening and figure out what to do about it. This causes us to rethink how we live, what we do, what we produce, and can even change the way we behave with each other.
And lately we are becoming aware of how we are on the larger scales of reality. We see that how we act on a mass level tends to define the choices for the individual in that mass. And from this, we see that if we define a better way for Humanity to live, which does not create mass extinction events and war and starvation and horror, if enough people understand that goal, then the mass forces that are indeed beyond our own egos can produce that kind of world.
And the Zeitgeist Movement comes into existance. It is a paradigm shift, a change in the way that we behave and think on the mass scale. To say it more simply, 'common sense' changes, and that changes everything. This is why the Zeitgeist Movement does not think in terms of 'how to do' the changes. It may, someday, but for now, the real job is to get the vision of the world that we want to see, to live in, for our children's children onto the seventh generation to live in.
The very idea of a paradigm shift is a recent observation, and about as impossible to most people's ideas of what is possible as flying was to people in the 13th century. But the Zeitgeist Movement is not an immediate reaction to events of our day... it is something larger than that, as the world is larger than the tiny amount you can see if you step outside, or the tiny number of people you can talk to in your circle of friends. It is a large scale social phenomina, something beyond the individual, although it comes from the individual rethinking what they want for the future.
We know it cannot be imposed, coersed, or driven by fear or violence, cannot be created by governments, religions, corporations, and certainly not by the military. It will come from people individually changing their minds and simply doing things differently. The Venus Project is an early concept of what might be done, nothing else. Buckminster Fuller and many others also worked on this problem.
But what will be done is not knowable. How it will be done is not knowable. It's an evolutionary dynamic by a species never existing in this ecosystem before. We are this planet being aware of itself. We, together, are the zeitgeist... the sense of the times, and if there is movement, it will be because enough of us agree with the goal of global sanity that the world becomes sane. Is that spiritual enough for you?
Peace and Good Health,
Roan Carratu worldmind@yahoo.com
Very well said, I almost agree =)
I particularly agree with this: "But some of us sense it is far more than a few people or even a few ideas."
and this:
"But what will be done is not knowable. How it will be done is not knowable."
This is why I do my best to both here and in TZM inspire people to appreciate the different ways in which different individuals and movements go about this change. All of it is spiritual enough for me =)
But I have to say, that when it comes to this, I really do not agree with you:
"the real job is to get the vision of the world that we want to see, to live in, for our children's children onto the seventh generation to live in."
That is a very important part of the job, and maybe the one that you want to concentrate on. Someone else will want to concentrate on something else. And no matter if it is through action or education or whatever, it will all spread awareness and insights to people, as well as small drops of evolution.
Bless, and be blessed!
the movement vs. the chapters
Worldmind this is a brilliant description of the movement even if it has some flaws in it like everything. I will copy this and translate it to German for our chapter. What I wanted to add to this thread is that the possibility to create or form your own "Chapter" thus allows you to make the small changes you want to see in your community. Never has Peter or anybody else said, don't grow your own healthy food in your local Chapter. The Chapters are in a way disconnected to the Movement as a whole. There is plenty room in it to bring any "small" changes you want to see, as long as you don't make money out of it.
Very well said, I almost agree =) Susan Florries — Apr 13, 2010
Actually, your point is part of the 'we' I am talking about. It's a gestalt of individual choices and interests that all together should create a world worth living in for our descendants. I was mostly addressing the expedient goals of the monetary system, which are currently destroying the ecosystem. It is what is doing the most damage, imho.
Peace and Good Health,
Roan Carratu
just another aspect
I think that we think the same about Zeitgeist, and I very much agree with what you say. I just wanted to point out an aspect in the choice of words which I find important: I think that the moment you start saying "this is the most important" people can misinterpret... I find it better to say something like - "I/we/many find this the most important" - or similar.
Sorry for being picky- otherwise I really find your post most enlightening and very well formulated.
Peace and good health to you too!
Susan










