Zeitgeist Day 2010

Zeitgeist Day 2010!

Hello all! I hope this post finds you all in high spirits. Mark your calendars for March 13th. Set the date and get connected with an event in your area. Full event details online now at www.zday2010.org. 
This is a very important day for the movement, for this will be our first worldwide event coordinated in such a manner. We have grown alot in this past year, and new information has made it's way to the hearts and minds of many. Yet the great need to spread the word and engage in serious civil discussion about the ideas of The Venus Project to new ears is evermore apparent with every rotation of this little blue ball we live on.
For anyone who might find this post without any understanding of what I'm talking about- please do yourself justice and take the time to watch "Zeitgeist Addendum" and visit The Venus Project & The Zeitgeist Movement websites. All information is free to download/view. 

Here's to peacful transition!
Love and Light!

www.thezeitgeistmovement.com
www.thevenusproject.com
   

Posted by: Kitaki Two Crows posted in: Evolver Philadelphia

Comments

Zeitgeist Day Video

Here is a video that I edited for the Zeitgeist Day event...

http://www.youtube.com/user/PiPhD#p/a/u/1/mv1Kew6EQoA

- pi -

http://PiALOGUE.info
http://Facebook.com/PiPhD

what will it be? dichotemy?

Venus project is spooky. No ideas are spoken that entail us living in harmony with eachother, just a bunch of machines doing shit for us. how boring is that? thats retarded, u guys are unevolved and want to suppress people for believing in religions. Religion is not the cause of all the bad stuff in the world. Didn't the movie say 9/11 was an inside job? Doesn't that mean that religion was not the cause of that terrorism. Religions have been endlessly coerced by people who want to use science as the next mainstream religion. But science has been proven to support money over truth so wipe those stars out of your eyes. Science is a fun thing, I like to explore possibilities and experiment. But it's not more imminent than my spirit. I won't be letting you guys allow machines to build my house or buildings for me, I like human made things. think they look much better than mass produced buildings that would look all the same. No culture there. I'd prefer the mcdonalds culture over that lack of culture. So, no culture. a cult founded on worshipping government/industry influenced scienctific "facts", what else can we pile on. Probably a lot of genetic modification would be hitting the streets too. Say bye bye to cures for cancer once that happens.

All I'm saying is there's a perfectly good 9/11 film out there, Loose Change. this movie took that and added their slants o religion...and then once they got you feeling like they are cool people and down with truth. They throw this humanistic bs at you and hook you in. It's called bait, and it looks tasty, and you are hungry. Don't bite yo, don't bite.

Movements don't save the world, people do. Individuals with faith in each other do. Groups always wind up suppressing others they deem enemy of the group. Come on wake up and relax. If we just help each other out and do our part to get involved in things that can do something right, then we can step back from blaming this or blaming that. There is no need to slay the wicked, just leave them to face death, and they will perish.

We can't set our sites on something to get bent on, like a project of some kind. We have to plant the seeds of our wisdom and contentment, to see what takes root. A plan is always going to wind up suppressing the earth, and suppressing it's inhabitants. I'm all for world peace, and living in equilibrium with nature, and many ideas of the venus project, but it's when we take action as individuals that will free ourselves, and free those around us from their chains. that's a big first step. but more importantly, people need to know about the real truth. That there are cures for cancer

(watch "dying to have known" by steve kroschel on google video)

that governments mess with religions and use them as scapegoats to forward their agendas. they want people to not believe in anything so that one day they can be the only thing to believe in. Isn't this what Alex Jones told us so many years ago when he mentioned the globalists agendas'???? I know you know what I'm talking about, come on who's with me?

The enemy is misinformation about the stuff that matters. What matters is people. and we are made discontent so that we will hate eachother on the highway, or try and make a few bucks off of someones naivety, or whatever you do personally. This step is going to be us choosing whether we want freedom and contentment or a world government with it's state, subconsciously mandated, religion known as science. All they want is something for you to give your spirit(your faith(your trust)) to, then you will be open to do it with other things. the point of science is to have fun and drop things off leaning towers to see what the nature is. but science isn't used for that anymore! its all serious and boring now giving way to an inhumane world of machines. What's going on is a perversion of the foundation of science.

"Life's a garden, dig it"

Wow!

Wow! You’ve covered a lot of ground here, let me see if I can give an eloquent response. Thank you for your input, I really appreciate it, but I would have to disagree with a lot (probably all) of what you’ve said in your comment.

“No ideas are spoken that entail us living in harmony with each other, just a bunch of machines doing shit for us”

Fresco’s main platform is so that we can all be living in harmony with not only just each other, but with nature as well. If you missed that message, I suggest you watch Zeitgeist Addendum, or read from his books (http://www.thevenusproject.com/get-involved/free-downloads). Technology should not be feared as some cold and foreign thing that separates us. Look at the platform by which we are even communicating right now – technology is allowing me to write to you. Technology has brought us all closer together. Should this replace actual human contact and connection – No. It is still a very important tool that we use to unite, share, and educate with.
Without technology, we would have a far more difficult life. Eyeglasses, calculators, cars – these tools enable us to do so much. What we are talking about is upgrading everything to current knowledge. The way technologies today are used, for the most part, are unsustainable and need to be upgraded/replaced to enable us to do more without destroying the environment. Boring you say? I don’t think so. If you want to build your own bike as a hobby, no one is going to stop you. Is that how we are going to have them made for the public – No.

“…u guys are unevolved and want to suppress people for believing in religions”

We want to reveal the truth that dogmatic systems that are blindly followed are indeed unhealthy and can lead to destructive ends. If I want to chant prayers to Ganesha, no one is going to suppress me. If I want to sacrifice a child to honor my god – you better damn well know right now, that will indeed be suppressed. If you look at all the religions, the basis of them, they all speak of the same thing – treat each other like family, love each other. This is a system to help that become a reality. Dogma destroys people, it pits us against one another.

“Religions have been endlessly coerced by people who want to use science as the next mainstream religion.”

I find no basis to this claim. I think that you just heard Alex Jones say this over and over, and you’ve decided that it would sound smart to repeat it. Please elaborate on what you mean in your above statement. How are we making science a religion? What you are claiming here is a paradox. The basis of religion is superstition and traditionalized dogma – to blindly follow a pre-established doctrine. The basis of science is to critically think, to research and build new, not follow old - To be skeptical and test something to help unveil the truth of the universe. We aim to deconstruct all dogmas.

“But science has been proven to support money over truth so wipe those stars out of your eyes.”

What you are talking about here is a concern over a corrupting monetary system, not science itself. Gravity can’t be persuaded to let me fly if I have a big bank account.

“I won't be letting you guys allow machines to build my house or buildings for me, I like human made things.”

Did you even build your house? If you did, great – how many trees did you have to cut down to make it? The way we create homes and buildings today is inefficient and environmentally destructive. I am sure that the people of Haiti would have loved to have had a “cookie-cutter” home that could have withstood an earthquake!!!!! When I think about how arrogant we have all become it infuriates me. Many people throughout the world don’t have a safe structure to sleep in at night - and you are worried about what? Worried about producing multiple housing units that look similar? We should worry about functionality and safety first and foremost.
We have all got to step back and understand that this attachment we all have to material things has been cultivated in us from birth. It’s a cultural disease to identify our “self” with material things. The way I dress, the car I drive, the house I live in - We have got to stop identifying so deeply with things that don’t matter!

“…a cult founded on worshipping government/industry influenced scienctific "facts"”

There is no cult here, we have no dogmatic scriptures to follow blindly, no guru prophets speaking in tongues interpreting extraterrestrial moonbeam radiowaves. We are talking about making the world a functional place, where everyone can be fed, clothed, given education, housing and medical treatment. We are talking about honorable goals and a scientific real life way of accomplishing that. What basis to you find that we are a “cult”? This sounds again like some reciting of Alex Jones.

“Probably a lot of genetic modification would be hitting the streets too. Say bye bye to cures for cancer once that happens”

Kinda going off on a little tangent toward the end here are we? What are you talking about? Really – where are you getting this from? Peter has brought up the fact that the modern day cancer treatment methods are a sham. The monetary system as it exists today is why we aren’t seeing any real steps forward in the Cancer Industry. That’s why – because cancer treatment has become a huge money-making Industry all it’s own. You are implying that The Venus Project wants to suppress medical research?! This is on the verge of slander. I think you are just highly mis-informed about what the goals of The Venus Project truly are. Medical research is at the forefront of our goals.

I’m not even gonna bother responding to the rest of your comment, as you just get further and further from anything that has anything to do with The Venus Project and The Zeitgeist Movement. Your projections are way off base, and highly mis-informed. I really suggest that you do some more research into the Zeitgeist Movement before you go rattling off these attacks anywhere else. I really don’t know why you feel so threatened by what we are suggesting. Please PM me if you want any further information about what we are truly trying to do.

Peter Joseph: "Where are we going?" Nov. 15th '09 1/2 from peter joseph on Vimeo.

I'm not trying to beat you

I'm not trying to beat you out here in a fight, just would like to hash this out publicly:

haha funny you should mention it, I work with natural building dude. I know you zeitgeist people think you know it all so much that you thought you knew me before you even knew me. I build with natural building and you were so sure I was some internet asshole, see who's the but hole?. I currently own a yurt too that I built out of scraps from an old deck that my neighbor was getting rid of. Reclaimed frame and use raw wool from a shepherd in western Massachusetts, for insulation, along with an old tent for waterproofing. All wrapped in burlap from the local agway. 150 bucks for my very own home. I am the change I wish to see in the world. so don't tell me how to change this shit with the zeitgeist/venus project. I grow my own food, i develop permaculture techniques that anyone can do... along with, alternative energy and fuel production. I don't give my personal power away to ideologies like zeitgeist or venus projects. I use my power to affect change and create thought provoking memes. I don't want your system in this world. I like to do things myself and so do a lot of other people.

My suggestion to you is become jewish if you don't believe in Jesus and for you to realize 9/11 has nothing to do with the historiography of religions. 9/11 has to do with a power elite who killed many of our fellow Americans on that day. I'd say getting some justice for that is a little bigger of a fish to fry than the truth behind religious allegories.

Religion is not why the world is messed up, bottom line. It has nothing to do with 9/11 either, bottom line.

so why are they grouped together? religion is a personal issue, not something a group takes up a crusade behind. Half your movie talks about religion so don't tell me Zeitgeist isn't about trying to purposely undermine religion. I went to a church dinner a few weeks back or less, and people are cool there, I don't mind muslims either. I have a muslim friend and some of my favorite people are Muslim gas station owners. I also know there are many Muslims being persecuted in Palestine by a people who are supposedly against persecution of religion.

See, if you read that last sentence, you'll see that all that is wrong here on this planet is people's perspectives are so A or B, dichotemy, you gotta open up the window and look outside the box, it's a really nice day out man.

like I said this is a hot subject so this isn't an argument here, I'm not fighting but the magnitude of what we're discussing is mind bendingly big so yeah, tempers flair.

The Electron is real.

The Electron is real.

re: the electron is real

"With quantum mechanics you can prove that light is made out of particles experimentally...You can build up a whole mathematical theory of light traveling in little particles called photons, and you can do experiments, and the experiments will give you a pattern.. showing that light is travelling like particles.

We've also got a whole mathematical theory built up showing that light travels as waves, and we've got experiments that show you that light travels as waves

As one physicist said in the 1920's said, it looks as if the damn light is waiting to see how we're gonna do the experiment, and then deciding how it's going to travel"

- Robert Anton Wilson
"Life's a garden, dig it"

Reply to Jivatma

this was a copy of the below post.

Reply to Jivatma

i would like to point out that you are contradicting yourself with the statement '' all that is wrong here is peoples perspectives are so A and B, dichotomy, you gotta open up the window and look outside the box, it's a really nice day out man."

if you truly believed this you would be happy that other people such as those involved in the venus project are implimenting something positive ecological blueprint to help change the way we live', details of whether or how it should be done aside, none of us have the right answer!!! it is very arrogant to assume that any one individual does, but at least people are doing things to make steps to move out of world corruption. As an ecologist I support many community projects including this one that campaigns for sustainability for the planet and humanty as a whole and I give kudos to any individual who is living sustainabilty in action, i do not have ideas that this should be done any one way, as we are all learning to live in balance with the earth, i support all ways to change that moves away from all short term agendas for greed and power to long term sustainable choice and autonomy for the individual and community as a whole.

If one is not part of a religious group does it mean they ought to be treated with hate and criticism? Being of christ consciousness, would you not be a bit more unconditionally loving to others who are attempting to change the world and move away from greed and corruption.

as one who goes to church, i assume you have a deep understanding of Christ consciousness, you will also understand that Christ was a heart centred being, non-judgemental, whereas you seem busy creating dichotomy through judgements, many false assumptions only contradicting yourself and without much research.

You are defensively stating how you are living the correct way and others are not with the assumption that individuals of the Zeitgeist movement have given their individual power away when the whole movement is actually about self empowerment, sustainability is about self empowerment and empowerment for the community as a whole.

There is a lot more malevolent stuff going on out there than the this movement which you could be focusing on if that what you feel the need to do.

One could also speculate that being part of any religion is giving up ones personal will to something outside of oneself, which could be seen as also giving ones sovereign power away? The current capitalistic system already has enslaved many in very complex ways the programming is deep.

Change is created with momentum through building community, as individuals make a choice to change things, they then work together to create a movement to put that change into action. You are part of a movement in your community church, even if you see yourself as an individual containing your own' power', you also contribute that self to your community to create something more. There is no different to this movement, there is no dichotomy between the two, It is only ego that likes to create separation of i from them, we are all one, powerful individually and together, it is the oligarchic system that you ought to be aware of that is busy working to try and stop us realising this, not the Zeitgeist movement.

You seem intent on labelling the Zeitgeist movement as anti-religious when all it is doing is acknowledging objectively that the political world uses religion to manipulate and control,. There are some deeply spiritually aware people in this movement from all cultural and religious backgrounds as well as non-religious backgrounds, and it is not some cult or sect that you seem to be lumping everyone into.

Just because people support this movement, it does not mean they are not out there living sustainability, themselves taking action individually, just as you like to see you are.

If people here choose to support some movement that is a positive non-violent way to change corruption in the current system to sustainability, where else have you seen such a solution being given and who are you to slander it?

The Zeitgeist movement and the Venus project do not condemn religion or people who are religious, but it observes objectively that religion is a POLITICAL tool used through millennia to create divide in humanity, it has been manipulated, groomed, changed and exaggerated by the oligarchy to create extremes and illusions of separation confusing and fragment people so they completely forget that we are all united with the divine source and instead they argue over show god is the greatest and most real god.

So be glad, joyous and happy, practice non-judgement, stick your head out the window take a deep breath, smiling to yourself that positive change is ahead. PEACE!

Great examples of this throughout history can be found in William Bramblys book The Gods of Eden http://www.ukrytesprawy.org/inne/William_Bramley_-_The_Gods_of_Eden.pdf

Unfolding an ever evolving humanity

enter:the Jittery Zeitgeist

The Venus Project is a bit spooky. i'm with you, Jivatma, there. i'm no scholar on this but i have paid much attention to the Venus project and the Zeitgeist Movement. it all does seem so mechanical and ultimately, dystopian. i do harbor belief that there is a way that the Earth 'wants' us to live on it. it really comes down to a widely neurotic 'quality of life' concept that is so imprinted in so many folks minds. Frecos's techno-utopia is just a little too hopeful and unbalanced with 'humanity'.
i live in a yurt as well, and participate in many alternative building gatherings. this is where it's at. Technology is very valuable but i believe it should be minimal, only as necessary, not as a uber-band aide for pathologies that ultimately arise in the mass consciousness from distorted and manipulated human psyches. haven't we realized yet that we cannot create a utopia by any means of technology. this is an old and exhausted idea. if we are to come together as a unified people, it will be the result of a threshold being actualized, as the hundredth monkey 'turns on' 'tunes in' or 'wakes up', however you metaphor it. This life is the ground where the One that we are tempers and distills itself. These techno(ill)logical dreamings are consciousness directed in a wrong direction, missing the mark, the point, as beautiful as the designs are, they are more suited for a literary epic than to the world situation. i would love to believe that Fresco's vision could be actualized and that this would be a suitable way to live for the whole of us, but i do not. for one (of a million) we have based ALL of our technologies (save military) on planed-obsolescence for so long, i don't know if such a 360 in 'design theory' could be possible in time to have any hope for such a revolutionary movement.

yeah, the magnitude here is so big this may need to be discussed one element at a time to get anywhere with it, feel like i'm coming across here ignorant because there are so many directions that i'm drawn to comment on but have to make a generalization to touch it.

medical research.
is life extention really something we should persue? i know this is cliche, but there are natural, ie. non-manufactured means to health. when the body is sick, there is cause, there is something the individual must address to find it's own balance to better resonate with a natural world moving toward balance. when our time has expired, the body dies, we move on. Technology, in health, like so many other things, enables us to 'miss the point' or avoid learning valuable lessons that are drawn into the strange and beautiful design that the natural world is the manifestation of. Bio-mimicry is much more along the ines of something feasible as technological advance.

http://asknature.org/

The Zeitgeist Movement film is very effective in exposing the economic oppression system, but many of us can point out the problems, who among us can offer solutions? The Venus Project? i don't think so. i think if we are to turn our situation around, it is not by way of uber-technology, but by awakening consciousness. when the veil is lifted, we'll realize what it is we are actually doing, our delusions wiped away, seeing things as they are... from here we will move in a direction that will lead to a unified people, a people wit a realized intention.

“Religions have been endlessly coerced by people who want to use science as the next mainstream religion.”

i think that truth in this is self evident. Religion is born of the experience of ground of existence, the Truth that is one. we've painted it in so many subtly different shades as to cause divisiveness among us. it's the parts that are 'made up' or contrived for political or other self serving purposes that cause the struggles between. it is people that mess things up but religions are people, in organization with apparent common belief.

The endless coercion is what makes the religious institutions so weary of technology, the zeal is what is flag raising, symbolically 'taking our lives out of God's hand and into our own". i've found in my own life that the less i try and control or force the outcome i want, and instead i make the space in myself for the Spirit to habituate, giving me a detached insight and trusting in the Design that the things i leave to what you might wrongly call 'chance' but is closer in actuality to 'leaving it in God's hands' or 'letting Nature take it's due course' with my interaction, not control. this is no cop out either, i do take responsibility for myself, but there is a difference between taking responsibility and trying to control or force an outcome, innit?

not sure if i'm making much sense here, this is too great a topic to discuss generally. i'm not against or for the Frescons but i do not believe in a technological utopia.
better than pushing this as an 'agenda', make a great epic of it in literature, plant the memes, let the soil of our consciousness break down the ideas into nutrients that we can use to grow into a new mode of habitation on this Earth. science is only now confirming the ancient religious concepts in terms of energy and such. science is not but part of our modern ziggurat, our tower of babel, our half and missed understanding of the true nature of things, often caught in the trappings of an individuals cultural and religious imposed limitations.

a spiritual science is something a bit different and, IMHO, far more valuable. comparative religion, comparative mysticism, the points where most spiritual or religious groups overlap is where unity lives.

alot of great minds are wrapped up n this Venus Project, minds that could be better applied to realistic and applicable solutions and concepts.

wheni first learned of the Zeitgeist Movement, i was all for it, i made copies of the vid, talked it up with community etc. then once i had penetrated the ideaology further and looked at the Venus Project, i was entirely disappointed. This was the solution put forth after taking apart the system in the Zeitgeist film??? a technological brave new world??? the disapointment was followed by another feeling, a feeling that these are dangerous ideas, with some very sinister undercurrents. Spooky.

-g

di te incolumem custodiant

[moved to below]

[moved to below]

glyph

sorry not sure how that posted twice!

some very interesting points there glyph, my understanding for the emphasis on in the venus project on technology is that they are aware that we have technologies available to humanity that could remove many of the problems that cause drought, pullution and even plant based cures that exist for cancer and aids and free energy technology is something very realistic that could be available to humanity for free, look up trombly, tesla, reich to name a few.

The reason why these technologies are not freely available is because the oligarchy profit from drought and pollution, and the pharmaceutical companies profit from there never being a cancer cure presented or released to humanity, and so on... when infact these remedies have all been discovered and the scientists that made the discoveries destroyed and slandered along with their work.

unfolding an ever evolving humanity

Sailing

this is true, we've known this for quite some time, no?
but are really to rely on this deus ex machina plan for the survival of ourselves despite ancient, eternal patterns of change, rise and fall, birth and death, the cycles, processions...?
is it the belief of the members of the Venus Project that this is a point when we take unto ourselves the responsibility for the workings of the world that we, being honest with ourselves, are infantile in our understanding of?
Our highest technologies fall flat in the perfection of nature. The situation in the world now needs more stopping of what we are doing than doing any more tampering.
The idea that technology (consumerized or optimized) will soon solve everything is anything but original, more it is the type of thinking that brought about the imbalances in the environment which we have and are still causing.
this isn't Permaculture or Bio Dynamics, both 19th century developments that are maybe more relevent today than when they were introduced to popular thought, this is a cyber-ideology.
I may be wrong, maybe evolution does go off in this direction, as unlikely as that seems to me, but does this not ring anyone's ears of taking on a role of something that is already provided. It's novel thinking in a sense, but it fails to account for the philosophia perennis. this notion of building this brave new world is simply against natural order.
all the points about technology suppression, the economic scham, all that is what makes the Zeitgeist Movement and the Venus Project valuable and interesting but the further agenda is an agenda of a man, a man like any other, fallible. A man with many supporters, collaborators ans followers, but a man. I have far more trust in Nature (capital N) than in man.
this is no time for soft-headedness, we must be very discerning and not be lost to astonishment in beautiful aesthetic designs and the promise of a perfected technological program that will do all of our laborious tasks, which have purpose in themselves.
there are more simple, intuitive ways of reducing unnecessary actions ie. labor, but this is in resonance with natural patterns, less than the VP's manipulation of such patterns.

i'm not on the attack, really. i've just gotten drawn into this after seeing the fanatical zeal of the proclamers. again, spooky.

Namaste

Zeitgeist Movement = Enlightenment

To the recent posters (argumentators), the Zeitgeist Movement is about offering "information" for people to enlighten themselves to actual reality. To confuse the Zeitgeist Movement with the Venus Project is to be illiterate (i.e. unknowing of the actual situation). That is a Fox News "Bait-n-Switch" technique, denounce one thing by talking about something completely different as if they were the exact same thing.

- pi -

http://PiALOGUE.info
http://Facebook.com/PiPhD

tarassein

"To confuse the Zeitgeist Movement with the Venus Project is to be illiterate"

-seriuosly?
are they not two parts of one agenda?
one a film pointing out the problems like many others, and the later the proposition for progress?

"offering "information" for people to enlighten themselves to actual reality"

-so, there is 'information' that entails enlightenment? how much does it cost? will i also need to purchase any hardware for my enlightenment, perhaps an RFID or barcode? will there be upgrades as more enlightent information is procured.

really.
apologies to come so harsh, but you have truly made some bold statements there that really expose some serious misunderstanding of even what we do know of the nature of reality, friend.

Namaste

Dirty Tricks Committee

You sound like a "plant" dude, someone who is a part of the "dirty tricks committee" sent to disrupt integral processes. You are being "argumentative" which means you are pulling ideas out of your butt and making conjecture (lies) to dissuade people from participating and putting down ideas that have the "potential" of actually being viable.

Perhaps you are depressed and can not see or understand the genius behind the ideas being presented?

How can we do anything "new" if we do not first present the "concept" and get people's imaginations flowing like kick-starting a motorcycle?

Please, be serious about wanting solutions...

the Venus Project London Lecture by the Zeitgeist Movement

Lecture given Jacque Fresco and Roxanne Meadows of The Venus Project.

http://vimeo.com/7866864
Part 1 of 2

Part 2 of 2
http://vimeo.com/7979712

Brian o' Leary interview

Rather than debating details the main focus ought to be is we need to change the way we are living now and impliment that change, thats all that matters.

Project Camelot interview Brian O'Leary an ex-astronaut and physics expert, who talks about many of the issues brought up in the above discussions,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3cBOq5-nZw

unfolding an ever evolving humanity

Echo Jivatman

I am the change i want to see in the world. ever still becoming. people need to reorganize themselves, not the technology reorganizing the people.

How to stop absorbing other peoples energy

A breather!

glyph

"The idea that technology (consumerized or optimized) will soon solve everything is anything but original, more it is the type of thinking that brought about the imbalances in the environment which we have and are still causing."

Agree and understand where you are coming from, but the type of technology i personally support utilises the earths energy field, the ether, this is natural engineering of the earths etheric force and the type of technologies that have been supressed also engineer the earths natural abundant energy, i do not know what other technologies the venus project support but these are the kind my mind is set on.

The word technology can be used to describe simple things such as a hollow tube, a knife fashioned from bone, or a watering can, im not refering to high technologies such as robots or the likes of that which some describe with singularity. im all for embracing nature too.

http://sailingbeyondknowledge.podOmatic.com

unfolding an ever evolving humanity

and lastly...

after being such a "argumentator" i mustmake it clear i am not against the Zeigeist Movement. Peter Joseph is brilliant, the Zeitgeist Movement is a very powerful movement that is opening peoples eyes to very important truths. The Venus Project, as a viable solution to our challenges, is what i find to be dangerously illogic. From what i gather Fresco is the zealot with his agenda, the Zeitgeist Movement either co-opted to draw attention or just a fortunate situation that Peter Joseph would agree with and stand behind Fresco's model techno-republic.
and again, Jacque Fresco is also a brilliant and well intended man, with along history of exemplified concern for mankind, i don't think either of their followers are necessarily 'wrong' or ignorant, i'm just concerned that the momentum of this great movement is ultimately directed in a course that cannot be realized of itself. there are elements and insights that need attention and should be spoken but the movement as a complete solution, as well as many of the ethics of mechanization here expressed, i feel, should be abandoned. these ideas could be tempered in counsel and as a fractional influence of a greater organization of visionaries, who may help in actualizing a better way of being.
the technological obsession is a human characteristic. it seems a form of escapism to the reality of the cycles of existence. the future is unknown, the cycles of the past are consistent and precise, i feel that to assume so much and to vest faith in a system of technology to overcome what has been simply the way of things for eternity is bad thinking.
just some things to consider, i'm not trying to be an adversary for the sake of it, nor do i have an agenda of my own to push, i'm simply expressing myself based on what i do know of things.

namaste.

Argumentative Tactics

This is a perfect example of "argumentative tactics" in that there are ZERO actual "facts" offered. This person is casting "general" dispersions without explaining "specifically" what is questionable. This is the type of person who is called "evil" because they attempt to "cast a spell" on people by creating a general negative vibe about the situation.

Please disregard this person's rhetoric.

silicon plated synapses

is this how you'd have things? that you can just 'disregard' informed opinion? spells and evil, huh, that's just kinda gaudy, really. "plant dude"? serious? i'm going to end this here, as responding to divisiveness get's none of us anywhere good. i've expressed my opinion and i think the discerning among you will hear what i've said.

Namaste.

It appears that in your

It appears that in your ideal world, Pi PhD, all that has to happen is views to the contrary of your own are disregarded, because you say so...

If you guys like the allegory laid out by the zeitgeist film, just become a jew. Why push your value system on people like nazis?

"Life's a garden, dig it"

Only The Facts

No, blatant disregard for "facts" is what should be ignored.

Show me "ONE" fact that was offered in the above rhetoric "against" the Zeitgeist Movement.

burn this book too Pi PhD

If you want to hide from the shadow side of reality, then you could build a walled city to keep out all evidence to the contrary, silence all opposition with name calling and finger pointing, along with some really overused flash words like rhetoric, evil and facts, and some new ones like spellcasters too... who else asks for facts? The 9/11 truth debunkers such as popular science magazine, we give them facts and they ignore them. But, the future is spiritual and it's subjective as fuck, what facts can someone give you for something in the future? what facts can anyone give about the future? you are unfair Pi.

the world is flat, anyone who thinks it is not is a spellcaster and evil... lol i think we evolved past that type of mentality a few hundred years ago, stop living in the past man

Philosophically, I for one don't care what you believe. Nor do I care what anyone else believes; that's their right as a human being to be and to believe in any allegory they want to. Be it Jesus, Mohammed, the big bang or Santa Claus. It's your right to have fun with life and to believe in something. Just like it's your right as a human being to not be manipulated by classified missions and secretive Governments. So let's fight for freedom, if it means fighting your own ego, please join the fight!

I for one don't believe in nothing. I don't believe that nothing created the universe. Nothing meaning, the definition of nothing. NOT nothing as in... I believe a God created the Universe. I just can't see being bored enough with my life to try explaining the universe, and my life is magickal because of my apathy toward that aspect, for my appreciation of it. Hope you wind up chill in the end Pi

"life's a trip, gano"

More Rhetoric & Slander STILL with ZERO "Fact"

There is yet more rhetoric & slander STILL with ZERO "fact".

The Zeitgeist Movement offers reasons for understanding ancient knowledge WITHOUT "belief" or blind acceptance of wild ideas.

so kick the jews out of

so kick the jews out of israel for stealing land under the context of wild ideas.

"Life's a garden, dig it"

Fact vs. Emotion?

Why do you appear to have such a challenge with the identification of "fact"? Are you so full of anger and frustration that you can not verbalize or conceptualize actual fact?

Double Wow!

I turned away from this for a day and it really blossomed into something. It's late in my time zone, and I want to give my responses some dignity before posting. I will say though, that I'm not too excited with your tactics here Pi PhD, kinda attacking these fellow Evolver's. I think we need to step back and breathe for a minute to let some of these ideas sink in - you know have a discussion and learn from each other. Jivatma - I'm not too comfortable with the way in which you are referencing "Jews". Anyone that "doesn't believe in Jesus" is a Jew? It's an odd way to reference an entire faith/race of people. I think that it's rather dismissive and insulting.

Double Wow

Agree with Kitaki Two Crows, anyone new reading this thread will simply be put off by the name calling racist remarks and ego attacks flying around as I said in my previous post, this really is a reflection of how so much in the human psychy needs healing, how can we have healthy debate if people act like this. The Earth is dying and people can only think about their own egos and public image with name callling and attacks on one another rather than focusing on the positive solutions.
unfolding an ever evolving humanity.

Like i said before, we do not have time for ego, emotive based arguments, Gaia is unwell, and everyone seems more interested in defending themselves rather than as Kitaki says "learning from one another."

Name calling and attacks religious or otherwise is a prime example of where the real pollution is coming from, it is in peoples minds and making hearts heavy, anger, bitterness, greed and that is why it has been projected outward onto mother earth. Perhaps people who are outwardly in denial that we need to change the way we communicate with the earth and one another because it means taking responsability of ourselves and not behaving worse than children!

The main focus ought to be love, unconditional love, learning, open heart, respect especially here of all places!!!

We need to change the way we are living now and impliment that change, thats all that matters, not who is right or who is wrong.

so zeitgeist can hate on all

so zeitgeist can hate on all religions, but the second I mention the paradox of the hebrew religion, I am a heretic or a racist, nice to finally see who you guys roll with...

"Life's a garden, dig it"

peace

Jivatma "hate'' is a strong and irrelevant word here

its quite clear from your above statement "so zeitgeist can hate on all religions," that you have are still not clear as to what Zeitgeist is about, or that you are purposely trying to stir and that you have choosen to ignore any of our earlier comments which explain otherwise, all you want to do here is be negative.

mc PEACE, PEACE PEACE

yes we certainly needs some peace here thank you! =)

unfolding an ever evolving humanity

you guys are crazy, have

you guys are crazy, have your peace now, but it's based on the "wild idea" that you are right in this situation. hey there you go, you just started your own religion

oh yeah I love how me

oh yeah I love how me proving you all wrong, means that I am being negative,

Every time one of you says something I can pick you apart. and if I wasn't responding to the higher up posts it's because I dont pay attention when people gang up on me. thats called mob mentality and gets no where.

And about calling me a racist for no reason, hmmmmmm

"Life's a garden, dig it"

Mis-interpretations

I think that there is a lot of misinterpretation going on. When Fresco began his designs and ideas, he has said that he drew all of his interpretations from Nature and the human body. He gives a beautiful example that if the human body attempted to use a democracy like the one in place today, we would simply die. The Brain would say “I’m the most important part, I deserve all the nutrients!”, then the Heart would argue that it was more important, then the kidneys would chime in the same. You see? There is no trading of money, there is no government “telling” each organ how much they are “allowed” to have. Our body functions perfectly in allocation of the resources it needs to survive.

What Fresco is attempting is bio-mimicry on the social level. It’s not to disregard nature, but to learn the most we can from it. One technology Fresco has been striving towards are what he calls “memory metals”, metals that have a structure and shape “memory” built into them. Fresco’s entire inspiration for this is a seed. He expressed how amazingly adaptive a seed is. A seed holds within it “memory” – a blueprint of an entire redwood tree, a grape vine, a sunflower.
What Fresco is suggesting is that we truly work to make our technologies better by designing from nature. There is always a feeling that science is cold and that technology disregards nature, and for good reason too. Science and technology today is used in the context of our monetary system. The only version of science we see is sanctioned by close-minded profit-seeking establishments. I mean when you step back and really ponder the horrors that are being produced by Monsanto – it’s no wonder we would all be afraid of technology. We cannot allow for this to be our vision of science and technology.

As far as the spiritual aspects of what the Zeitgeist Movement is talking about – I don’t really find it to be that big of a deal. I love that they focused the first film on deconstructing dogmas. I will always believe in Great Spirit and Mother Earth no matter what happens. Just because I align myself with a group that does not advocate my beliefs, well, it’s not really a big concern for me. I’m glad to gather together with like-minded people to fix the big problems in the world.

Praying and Chanting isn’t going to get clean water to kids in Africa – there is NO room for debate there. Technology and Science is what will allow for healthy drinking water to exist. Does that mean that I can’t dance and chant with those same kids – hell no it doesn’t! After I use science and technology to get them clean water – you better believe that me personally, I’m down to celebrate and chant to whatever god of the land I’m in. That’s just me though, a fellow member of The Movement will say that they wouldn’t do that. I think that what needs to be addressed, is the understanding must be cultivated that the songs and chants to the gods didn’t “turn the bad water into good water with magic”. The facts need to be known – through a scientific method and the use of technology, the contaminated water was processed into drinkable water. To allow those people to continue to think that their superstition provided them with clean water is wrong, and irresponsible. That is not “hating on all religions”, that’s respectfully informing people of the truth of that given situation.

I feel that another big mis-interpretation is the fear of the “loss of individuality” that “comes with The Venus Project”. There’s not gonna be one way to save this planet. The Venus Project is a vision. Neil on V-Radio (http://www.v-radio.org/) has a lot of different people from many walks of life featured on his show. From Veggie-Oil fuel alternatives, Wave and Tidal power designers, Open Source Ecology project designers, electric cars – the list goes on. There is no one way to fix everything. We aren’t just trying to “spread propaganda”, Fresco is not some “God” figure, Peter is not our “Jesus”, and The Venus Project is not “the Promised Land” – this IS NOT A RELIGION, this IS NOT A CULT! Do all the “Burners” give away their power and individuality by referring to themselves as such? No, they just want to help identify with others with a similar goal and outlook – to live differently, to change this planet. Burning Man is a place where they can gather to share with one another. Is it a cult? No. Just people “gathering under one roof” to bring something of substance into creation. I feel that The Zeitgeist Movement is trying to do something similar. We are not just running around trying to lay claim on as many fuel-alternatives that we can or anything like that. We are just attempting to have a gathering of the tribes if you will. There are SO MANY different organizations out there that are trying honestly to make a real difference in the world. If we can unite – collectively come together and find a way to effectively communicate our ideas and intentions with one another – change would be automatic.

discern

well spoken.
i agree with much of the above. i meant in no way to steer people from learning from this umm... touchy now, Movement. These are brilliant people with brilliant ideas. i do find this as an ideology lacking and creed-ish, but that is my opinion at this time as i know now. I think we should not put forth so much energy in one direction not knowing if that direction is true. Fresco himself has said that "it's the public that sucks", it's the mindset of the people that lead to the ends we are witnessing. the energy may be wasted vested in technologies that may actually be obsolete in the brevity of change. it is each one of us, individually, that must truly choose. chatter on forums is simply chatter, internal dialogue of the collective. it is in our every action that is the point where our energy is best focused, that we are 'being the change', not so much talking about it. And... the Zeitgeist Movement is being change, is awaking people's consciousness. for this, i believe, it deserves reverence but... this is a movement asking of you to trust in it whole, undoing religious tradition in it's path. this is the movements own undoing. it causes divisiveness, as perfectly exemplified here. trust in what is true in you, in no abstract way. in these times, it's un-wise to trust in fallible men and systems, systems that are but remixes of the previous generation's remixes of the previous and so on, again exemplified by the material in the ZM's films in their campaign disembling religious dogma. These religions were all attempts to unify a people, however things may have worked out politically, there are lessons to be learned there. some of these ancient systems contain elements that we do not truly understand as a people whole. that is a fact. it's very true that the painting of the myths undergo endless change, it's also true that they are stories of the cycles of the micro and macrocosm, which we are very much subject to. we likely would have lived better lives if the ideas presented here were the way of things since long ago, but is it not obvious we are far too late and not, individually and collectively, sincere enough for this type of "upgrade"? self honesty is important here. the Deus ex Machina became a unfashionable way to end science fiction in the time when this movement started, this is where many of the movement's memes associated were born. does that not make it a bit ominous as a survival plan? it doesn't seem a sound, viable solution. So many of those trumpeting these ideas are not, in their daily actions and lives, truly implementing. it seems to there has become a practice of associating oneself in some way to an group or ideology that is forward thinking and seemingly evolved. it seems also that this is satisfying to those who are well set in this paradigm or benefiting from the transactions taking place in discussing these great plans for the future, none of which could truly actualize, being the workings of, ultimately, biased and unbalanced people, however brilliant. those that i'm writing here about know who they are, they struggle with this every day, hence the modern 'self-help' Industry. Friends, please be discerning. we all want a good future, in whatever we think of of as 'good', let's pay close attention, know and realize just what that means as the days unfold and the veil is lifted. trust within.

a thousand suns

here's a great video from the Global Oneness Project, a group a little more level headed in it's ambitions and means. again, there's no agenda here. that's exactly what i'm speaking against. this is one of many groups that i pay attention to and learn from, i'm not trying to 'convert' anyone. strange to have to say those things, but this thread has some truly archaic accusations in it, so i did feel the need.

peace.

http://globalonenessproject.org/videos/athousandsuns

all appologies

sorry to harp here but i did mean to add that i wish the Zeitgeist Movement was just an education campaign, up until the kooky ending, i was loving these ideas and the presentation. This could have so much more value without the divisive elements.

my banter ceases.

Divisive Elements?

It's interesting you say that you feel that the ending of the films is "divisive", most feel that the information in the beginning sections is the "divisive" part.

Forgive me if you've already addressed this, but since we are here and now - is it The Venus Project itself you feel is "divisive"? Or is the the tactics you have seen Movement members use to spread the idea of The Venus Project you find "divisive"?

rounder (beta)

sorry, posted twice...

rounder

i feel there are divisive, not necessarily by intent - understand me, in the presentation as a whole to some degree. it's not the linearity of either of films but the presentation of information i refer to when i wrote 'at the end'.

it is the Venus project that disappointed me.

look, folks. i'm not trying to argue against this, please don't draw me into entanglement with this. i really don't take up issue with this movement as much as i'm just generally concerned with the afore mentioned 'bandwagoning' and such. our energy could be better spent actualizing the things we believe in than debating them, no? some thing do need debating, but not this, not for me, not now. i have said what i have to say and i don't have any will to change your minds other than the change you would choose yourself in the light of what is true. sounds lofty, but i mean it in the sense of owning up to ourselves individually. and... i'm no radical saying to look within rather than outside of yourself for purpose.

follks, i'm with you. we're all in this together.

"The faster we go the rounder we get"

Thanks for the eloquent response

"...So many of those trumpeting these ideas are not, in their daily actions and lives, truly implementing. it seems to there has become a practice of associating oneself in some way to an group or ideology that is forward thinking and seemingly evolved. it seems also that this is satisfying to those who are well set in this paradigm or benefiting from the transactions taking place in discussing these great plans for the future, none of which could truly actualize..."

I couldn't agree with you more. When there's a lot of hype about something, people jump on the bandwagon quick and just start spouting off things they've heard on the walk over. It's pretty easy to let someone else do the thinking for us. It's how we are conditioned to be. We are raised in a culture that withhold the nurturing of critical thinking skills/development so as to make us a sponge. So we watch the evening news and soak it up, then repeat our "left" or "right" version of it the next morning by the water cooler. By switching the information source, we are not creating actual change from within. The information source might be discussing different "enlightened" ideals, but our internal mechanisms are the same.

Our conditioning remains in place, but now we think that we are "enlightened" - which is almost more dangerous. I spent a number of years walking around with an arrogance unseen to me. I held a great disdain for the system and culture around me and made it known whenever I could. I would get attacked for my views and opinions - which only fueled my fire of righteous feeling. "Look at how asleep all of you are", "why can't these sheeple see the truth". After some internalizing and some needed medicine sessions I was horrified by what I was turning into. I was a hypocrite of the worse kind. I had merely found another "scene" another "click" to be apart of. I was a sponge just the same - I just changed channels. I was a consumer just the same - now I bought different crap to surround myself with. I saw my reflection as others saw me and it sickened me. It's dangerous place to be - "in the right". I mean, doesn't everyone with strong opinions believe themselves to be "in the right"?

I think thats why so many versions of "enlightenment" are a paradox. Owning a $1600 geode or $800 Ganesha statue isn't enlightenment. Repeating dogmatic phrases without living their meaning is useless. I really do hope that The Zeitgeist Movement doesn't de-construct through this paradox. Just because "we have 300,000 members" doesn't mean that each one of those members is in it for the right reason. Dogma is dangerous - in whatever clothes it's wearing.

All that was left...

i was about to write about how i thought that was the point, for us to stop thinking that we are 'right', but then i realized i thought i was right.

Kitaki, thank you for bringing some light to this. i was left feeling like i was defending something not my own. i went on and on because i felt like i had to to put into perspective, in detail it was asked, every aspect of my points of differentiation with the ZM/VP, all the while it was something it was something i still looked to with hopeful eyes. you've brought to the surface some of the things that could really mean something here. we can talk here about the things we agree are positive tools for implementing the change we want in our world.

paradox

hahaha, it is a paradox we've stumbled across isn't it? I guess a good realization to hold as truth would be that we are ever-changing creatures. So we can never truly be right, just right at that time and place...(?) Something to think about over a cup of tea I guess...

also,

also, i didn't address your question directly. it is the tactics, the kind of blind zeal i saw in the most enthusiastic and the sheepish-ness of those who'd found another 'channel', that drew me back from the movement.

...

Some points of contention that I'm not really

  1. Economic system: The Venus project is spot on with problems in the financial system, but offers no deeper understanding or real open source, bottom up solutions for economic coordination. As far as I can understand it, the venus project's solution is that values are determined 'objectively' and all resources are distributed by a central database... not a good solution in my mind. In fact anything with the word 'central' attached gets a big no in my book. Of course I might not be understanding this properly.
  2. Hating on Religions: So what's the gameplan? To get the world to simultaneously wake up and support the Venus Project (through the power of documentary films) and simultaneously forget their religions? What dude? So all those muslims and christians are just going to give it up and join the party? No, what's really happening is that this is the fastest way to hamstring any global movement for sustainability, is to make it religiously charged and give people the idea that their religion is causing all the world's problems.
  3. Technology: I'm all for it and in some ways that the Venus Project might gel with. I'm for everything open source designed, decentralized, automated, in harmony with nature. A union of mostly low-tech but high intelligence with a seasoning of some very limited but very advanced information, energy and transportation technology.

From the Zeitgeist Website:

The proposals he presented, and those of Plato's Republic, the writings of Karl Marx, H. G. Wells in his book The Shape of Things to Come, and many others all represent attempts to find workable solutions to the many problems that earlier civilizations were unable to resolve. There is little doubt that at the time of Bellamy’s books the social conditions were abominable, which made the Utopian ideal extremely appealing. What appears to be lacking in most of these concepts, however, has been an overall plan and the necessary methods for a transitional system to enable the idea to become a reality. Most of the early visions of a better world did not allow for changes in either technology or human values, tending to arrest innovative efforts. Additionally, all have lacked a comprehensive set of blueprints, models, and a methodology for implementation. Finally, they lacked competent individuals to bring about such a transition.

It's things like this that make the Venus Project 'spooky'. Especially to someone educated about the New World Order, and that doesn't just mean listening to Alex Jones. Ever read Plato's republic? Have you watched "Things to Come?" These are creepy books. Plato believed the perfect state would be ruled over by an elite set of 'philosopher kings' (later who are mimicked by HG Wells in Things to Come) who are authorized to lie to the general public to achieve their goals.

Essentially, assuming human nature is already good, and cooperation is good, we don't need any global 'plan'. We don't need any coordinators. We don't need any more 'movements'. We don't need to agree with one another or all share the same religion. We just need to unplug, reclaim our power however way we see it, whether it comes from god or it comes from ourself, and start cooperating. We need open source tools. We need to preserve our commons, expand it, and preserve our freedoms as they erode. We need to stop focusing on divisions and focus on the open.

So to the extent that the Venus Project is for all that good stuff... I'm for the Venus Project too. I resonate with it in a lot of important ways and wish for it's success.

Cheers,

Meade