Panic on the Streets of London

To get the most out of Evolver, create your profile now!
12
groks

The last three nights has seen a growing violence and escalation in rioting all over England's capital. I watch from my television set not so far away from where these displays of anguish were taking place.

One video on BBC news showed two young people looking at a store we have here called Debenham's and saying 'Lets get some watches.' There have been widespread denouncement of the riots and violence, many normal people being forced from their homes, businesses being burnt and looted.

What I find most hilarious about the media display is the shock they are promoting. Like this whole thing over the past three days which has seen the government powerless and the police force impotent, has somehow come out of nowhere.

In my humble opinion, people don't riot for nothing, whether conscious or unconscious. To me this is a very simple display of societal, political, individual and communal failure.

Recently, a free newspaper here in the UK called The Evening Standard has been running two large campaigns. One is called The Dispossessed Fund, a charity campaign to help those who are homeless or face other pressures in the capital. Many of those to be helped by the program are the youth.

The other is a literacy expose in which the paper revealed that 1 in 3 children in London don't own a book. In fact, when a class was asked by a teacher to bring into school their favourite book, one child brought a shopping catalogue.

Financial and personal desperation when combined with a severe lack in basic education it could be said can cause issues. An uneducated society, unheard and unloved must HAVE to react in someway when refused the ability to articulate.

So far, the media has perpetuated the problem as being technological. That the gangs of youths have been communicating via BBM (Blackberry Messenger) and this is where the problem lies. I believe this to be in correct, as I don't believe riots are the consequence of communication. There are a result of the LACK of communication.

We have allowed our youth to develop the mentality that buildings can be burned, people can be injured and peace can be disrupted for 'some watches'. What did we expect from a culture that invades countries for resources, bails out banks instead of the poor and would rather see a person homeless than see an unpaid debt?

Or is it as they say it. Simply a gang, or a group of gangs together being violent for the sake of being violent. Simply to steal and get their jollies?

Either way, it shows that our society has become aggressively unhealthy. Like Pinchbeck says in 2012, 'suicidal'. These 'youths' are destroying their own communities. But is it also that the youth is a reflection of those that raised them?

Ultimately, everyone is responsible for their actions, whether that be smashing up shop windows just as much as they are for their inactions and failing to notice the effects that ignoring young people has. The very fact the buildings on fire are buildings close to where these 'youths' live only shows to me what little sense of home and belonging they feel. Almost no connection or responsibility to the people and the world around them. Perhaps that's why they join gangs in the first place. Outsiders. Or more, positioned outside.

Just a thought.

Comments

Class analysis

I'm a little disappointed in the lack of class analysis in your article. Like these kids are just lashing out because they are uneducated, or because they see this as a good opportunity to grab some free watches.

When you have police coming into people's (ie. black and immigrant) neighborhoods, beating, arresting, and killing people on a regular basis, systemic looting of wealth from the working and lower class, etc... then this is exactly what you should expect back. And in fact, the gov't does expect this as a natural result of their policies. Why do you think the police have all those fancy riot weapons and armored trucks?

And I'd be very curious as to where most of the damage is really being done. I'd be willing to bet that most of the stores and buildings being damaged are in more affluent neighborhoods, or in neighborhoods that are being gentrified. People are not acting without intent.

also read this

http://london.indymedia.org/articles/9828

Criminality and Rewards

Published: August 09, 2011 00:36 by max von sudo |

What is the crime of looting a corporate chain store next to the crime of owning one?

-- Luther Brecht

Looters don't give many press conferences. This made all of the conversations on today's BBC morning show a little bit one-sided.

Having been out last night in Brixton, I feel as qualified as anybody to offer at least a bit of perspective as an anarchist living in the area for the past six years.

First things first. None of the people hauling ass out of Currys last night will ever pay £9000 annual tuition to David Cameron's shiny new neo-liberal university system, so beloved by the young people of London. Although Britain has a bit more social mobility now than in the Victorian era which Cameron seems to idolize, the racist overtones in the Great British societal symphony are still pretty loud. Most of the black people who participated in last night's looting of the Currys over on Effra Road may never make it off their housing estates and into the Big Society. They don't have a hell of a lot to lose.

Despite this, the fairly mixed (for Brixton) crowd of several hundred was feeling festive last night, as cars lined up on both sides of the road, all the way to Brixton Water Lane. They're not people who are used to winning very often. The chance to haul away several hundred thousand pounds worth of electronics, right under the helpless noses of the police who routinely harass, beat, and kill them, made it a great night. The fourteen year old girls heading for that 60 inch plasma TV of their dreams were polite enough to say "excuse me", quite sincerely, as they bumped into me while springing into the Currys parking lot. Last night, everybody on Effra Road was in a great mood.

This morning, killjoys in the corporate media disagreed.

Many commentators decried the lack of a clear political motive in the riots, and seemed worried about how unrespectable the looting makes it all seem. According to this line of thought, poverty is not political.

On the radio, on the web, and in the papers, there's a lot of talk right now about the 'stupidity' of the rioters, burning down their own neighbourhoods. All of the commentators who follow this line of argument haven't considered some pretty basic facts.

Outraged Guardian readers, I say to you: you're only partially correct. It's true that the guy carrying that cash register past Brixton Academy last night probably didn't conceptualize his actions according to rational choice economic theories. However, when compared with four years of failed state capitalist attempts to catapult us out of the economic crisis, his maneuvers were in fact the height of rationality. Destroying evidence by turning on the gas cooker full-blast and burning down the Stockwell Road Nandos is pretty crazy. But it makes a lot more economic sense, for Brixton, than anything so far attempted by Labour, the Conservatives, or the wizard brains of the City of London.

Smashing windows in Brixton is probably a surer road to prosperity for most people than any of the more respectable paths already explored.

The guy who showed up today to fix the smashed windows on Brixton Road may live just down the street from the shattered glass lying on the pavement; it's unlikely that he's a currency speculator or a hedge fund manager on the side. Any money he makes from fixing the windows will be mostly spent back in the local community.

The merits of endlessly sucking money out of the pockets of working people into the reserve accounts of the supercharged risk-takers at Canary wharf are quite a bit less clear to me, at present. The crisis is entering year five. Throwing hundreds of billions into the endless rounds of bank bailouts, corporate tax breaks, and other props for a global economy which increasingly resembles that of the USSR circa 1987 is not clearly a winning strategy.

The eruption of economic chaos in the Eurozone, and the police bullets which ripped into Mark Duggan, ending his life, are now two events which are bound together in a massive sequence of riots in London, the European continent's largest financial centre.

These riots are remarkable chiefly for the role-reversals they bring about, and most of the outrage in the corporate media is a reflection of this. The outrage is really interesting if you stop to think about it.

For instance: retail profit is a kind of theft. It's economic value which is hoovered out of a local community via corporate cash registers. The decisions about where to re-invest the profits are the preserve of corporate managers and shareholders, not the decision of the people from whom the value was extracted. The whole process is fundamentally anti-democratic.

This daily denial of basic democratic political rights is "normal", and may last for years, decades or centuries. Corporations may steal from poor people - but any attempt on the part of poor people to steal back must be condemned in the strongest possible terms.

Similarly, I had multiple conversations today about Saturday night's riots in Tottenham. They invariably referenced the case of Keith Blakelock, the police officer who was killed during the Broadwater Farm riots of 1985. Not one of the conversations I had included any reference to Cynthia Jarrett, the woman whose killing during a search of her apartment sparked those riots in the first place.

In the same way, I doubt whether any of the outraged middle-class commentators on the BBC 4 radio show this morning gave much thought to the dozens of people that the cops have killed in custody, or to the more or less daily humiliation of black youths who get stopped and searched outside my house. The message conveyed by all of this is pretty clear: police attacks on poor people who can't defend themselves (especially black ones) are normal. Conversely, popular attacks on police are an outrage, especially if they happen to succeed. And don't ask that guy who nicked the cash register to give his side of the story.

None of this is to say that the fire truck which just screamed past my window is a good thing. The political and economic problems of Brixton are complex. It's too easy to spout platitudes about how nothing will ever be the same again - but for a few hours last night, walking down Effra road with plasma screen TVs and Macintosh laptops, the losers were the winners. And that could have a powerful effect.

A Side Point

One thing I've also noticed, here in America where I live, that when ever there is rioting it seems "basic thievery" is such a close second to such initial sheer anarchy due to senseless repression.

It's like the capitalistic focus of the greedy overlords has such an overall effect on the collective conscious that even when it becomes obvious that the whole structure of capitol gain / materialism is itself the very disease ... still when the shit hits the fan and people finally get off their butts to hit the streets and state their actual case ... they fall victim to the same lame programming .... and loot / steal all kinds of electronic info-tainment ... all of the digital gimmicks ... what else is new ... what kind of message does that send.

As if were just the left overs of the non-middle class who can't afford the basic toys .. "which we really want man," .. "this is who we identify with man."

Such is far cry from a simple monk who sets himself on fire in selfless protest. Not to be necessarily critical, but just to show where our values seem to lie all said and done.

Of course it always feels at least a little good to see the grossly unbalanced scales tip in favor of the oppressed ... however such takes place is always in direct proportion to the overall collective karma.

Hard to imagine any greater progressive argumentation for any substantial cause taking place , when all there seems to be to the overall ideology is steal, or be stolen from. Playing by the same rules as the powers that be ... take whatever you can get away with.

"Steal a little and they throw you in jail ... steal a lot and they make you King" - Bob Dylan

Deep inside are any of us beyond conspiracy. Pirates of honor vs. the nobility of disrepute .. who is who is who is who.

"Wonder is what Mystery would do if it was conscious" ...
"Wandering is for every other possibility"
Pippalayana Muni

hey guys, firstly, thanks

cheers for reading my blog guys. yeah on reflection i didn't really go that much into class, which really does play a massive part in british society. because we are british and ultimately conservative, we keep bad news at bay, hide it away and never face it.

will write something else about that.

in terms of the areas that the violence is happening, it is predominantly the poorer communities. this is more in london, as the places, hackney, croydon, lewisham etc are not affluent areas in the way that oxford street is for example. or Piccadilly circus.

i live in east london, but i'm from manchester and now the violence was happening there. it's something that a lot of the 'politicians' are 'talking' about in time.

as for cctv, your man is right. britain blows for cctv. cameras are everywhere and it is a major part of the problem. although, i don't know which way i'm slanted...

cheers again guys and keep the articles you find coming. all wicked.

Same feeling

Just read your post, and like it very much - I felt and thought along similar lines around these events. Here a post I wrote about it - http://florries.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/riots_environment_responsibilit...

Thanks for sharing!
------
you are unique - all you do is ground-breaking

Syndicate content

"Banish the word 'struggle' from your attitude and your vocabulary. All that we do now must be done in a sacred manner and in celebration. We are the ones we have been waiting for." — Hopi elders

Sponsored by