Equality and Fairness - What do you think?

This document was created as an exploration of the following argument:

“Equality is not fair. Therefore fairness does not require equality & in fact, must reject equality unless it is based on accurate, fair measurements & judgments that require equal distribution to individuals, based fairly on them individually. This seen, it can also be known that equality by default breeds laziness.”

Definition of terms:

Fair - free from bias, dishonesty, or injustice

Equal - 1. as great as; the same as 2. like or alike in quantity, degree, value, etc.; of the same rank, ability, merit, etc.: two students of equal brilliance. 3. evenly proportioned or balanced: an equal contest. 4. uniform in operation or effect: equal laws. 5. adequate or sufficient in quantity or degree: The supply is equal to the demand. 6. having adequate powers, ability, or means: He was equal to the task. 7. level, as a plain. 8. tranquil or undisturbed: to confront death with an equal mind. 9. impartial or equitable.

Premise 1:

Equality is not fair (i.e., fairness does not require equality).

Premise 2: (not really a separate premise, more like an extension of premise 1)

Fairness must be 1) based on accurate measurements, 2) based on impartial judgements, and 3) must be distributed to all individuals equally.

Conclusion:

Equality causes laziness.

[Broken down into classic syllogistic form]

A is not B.

Therefore some A does not have attributes of B.

B must posess attribute X, attribute Y, and attribute Z.

Therefor A causes Q.

Reference

Irrelevant Appeal - Attempt to sway the listener with information that, though persuasive, is irrelevant to the matter at hand.

Conclusion

Although the conclusion of the original argument may or may not be true, it cannot be deduced or argued based on the premises supplied.