Why I'm a pro-life vegetarian. And you can't be anti-abortion and pro-choice sorry.

To get the most out of Evolver, create your profile now!
3
groks

I am pro-life, so that pretty much marks me as a leper in some communities. Look I think rape victims have rights and some cases should go under review. I don't agree however with blanket abortion rights. Because I don't think it makes sense to dehumanize a fetus which is essential to the human growth process. I'm vegetarian I don't eat meat because I value the life of an animal. I belief life is god so it is hypocritical to be pro-choice. Look, my pro-life stance stays in line with my beliefs. I believe inhuman treatment of animals should be illegal, so an unborn human deserves as much respect an animal. Let the abortion go under review, let some states make it illegal if they choose. I believe that its dehumanized to say that a fetus has no value. I'm not opposed giving some people a choice when the sex has been against their will. I'll make some enemies with this post, but people should know that where not all on the same page. I'm pro-peace which means I'm against wars, I'm a vegetarian I value the light of life in all aspects. There it is, thats how i feel, take it or leave it understand it or hate it. I respect the pro-choice view being that everyone of my friends and family are of that stance. I'd feel like a liar being pro-choice knowing deep down I have fundamental values that go against it. I understand why the issue got pushed to the extremes because anyone voicing their opinion on the matter got denounced as crazy and christian, well not anymore pro-life vegetarians come out.

Comments

sorry mom...

sorry mom...

...

I'm with you on this one, but I think there's more of a grey area when it comes to fetuses. Pretty much, when it is still like a little lump on the side of the uterus then then it's justified, but the minute he/she starts to develop a nervous system and form a human shape they deserve the same respect we pay to other life forms. I'd say like the number 5 stage in the Alex Grey diagram. Whatever respect you decide to pay to life forms, that is. So I'm opposed to late term abortions especially. And yes, I like pointing out the hypocrisy of animal rights activists who support late-term abortion.

And, I should point out here that if you are truly being morally consistent then you shouldn't make exceptions for cases of rape. I mean, It's not the baby's fault that his/her father was a rapist.

So pretty much, women need to have abortions very soon after they get pregnant or not at all. It's really not that hard to check. Only the very late term abortions should be made illegal, or at least shunned by society, because there is still too much of a grey area elsewhere and there are extreme consequences to making abortion illegal across the board.

i know

i know i know but there needs to be some standards it isn't right that the death of a human can happen so easily.

What interests me about all

What interests me about all of this is the undercurrent in the act of abortion, and birth control for that matter. The undercurrent being that our faith in the divine to provide adequate life experience and love for the very thing we are most innately driven to create is under threat. I am personally no pro-lifer because I truly believe that no one can mandate what we do with our own bodies and creative powers. If we truly believe in a loving divine source, then it is also very likely that this source will handle any consequences we may accrue in divine loving ways. Where we might fear the punishment of a heavy-handed God, the divine might actually give us "payback" by later blessing us with many beautiful children. The way we learn from the divine is by experiences that soften the heart with love and joy, not harden it with judgment and punishment. It is not up to us to decide the experience of souls, its up to the divine. I also feel that aborted fetuses are divine messengers that choose to have such an experience to reach us on the Earth plane. Many women report that the fetuses they aborted actually saved or changed their lives for the better. Purpose is as purpose does. We must accept that death is part of life and nature, that there is beauty and grace on the other side of this physical realm, that death is truly the ultimate freedom, and that death is as vital as vitality.

"death is part of life and nature"

I just can't see why a fetus is not the same value of a grown human. If i murdered someone, would you tell me, "death is the ultimate freedom, it is a part of life and nature" I don't think so. I do believe it is possible for a human to "sin" maybe that sets me apart. but I value all life, and I believe the destruction of life is a great atrocity, and should be valued in society highest of all. what i'm saying is life is so precious that it should never be destroyed, ever. oh btw i'm not christian but lets look at some pro-life prophets.
Krishna, vishnu, christ, Zoroaster, Buddah have all expressed that life should be valued highest, with all other things falling behind in importance.

ahh...

very interesting...but then there are the Jains who are so careful even in the way they walk the earth as to not crush any living things...what about the food that we eat...is that not life that we crush between our teeth, or put into blenders, even if it is plant life?
Life feeds on life! Forget about the fact that it is a Tool song lyric...it's true. The issue of abortion, however, totally raises so much confusion about what life really is! That's the first thing we really need to figure out before we settle this bit of rhetoric...the ultimate question that many answer, but few agree on...
...what is life?

Did Terry Shiavo qualify as 'life'? Does a 5 day embryo qualify?
I'm totally screwed here! Any ideas anyone? I'm not arguing here, just trying to help sort this out like the rest of y'all!

I see your point...

...in fact, the only person who's pro-life stance made me think a second time was Dr. Ron Paul...he claimed to have performed an abortion once in his career as an O.B., and deep down felt there was something horribly wrong with what he did.
I wonder if anyone remembers that bit of news which came out years ago about RU 486...the morning after pill...I thought that was supposed to 'settle' the debate...what ever happened?
I still support the right for a woman to do what she wishes with her body. I have to keep in mind that when you violate one individual right, you do so at the expense of all over rights. Individual rights include reproductive rights...but this issue is tough, for it asks us consider that an embryo be considered an individual. To tell you the truth, even after all these years, I still can't totally make up my mind in any black/white way...this is a doozy! But you have a good point!

god and life

Thank you for openly sharing your views everyone.

Myself being a secular humanist while fully appreciating the transpersonal and mystical dimensions of human experience, I would say that i deeply cringe when people give religious and metaphysical reasons to support certain social policies. Let's keep talk of "god" and such things out of the social sphere. Spirituality is a deeply personal matter, and when it infringes on society it becomes religion, an oppressive bureaucracy, a weapon of power.

What's very important to me is this: It is easy for us geeks who sit in front of laptops, mostly men in this case it seems, to pontificate about the religious moralizings on the issue of abortion. However let me ask you this, how many of you were born to deeply dysfunctional unloving parents who never wanted you in the first place? How many of you were born into poverty and violence? How many of you grew up in abusive foster homes?

I think that quality of life precedes quantity. If a potential parent sees that bringing a life into the world would only be a burden to both the mother and child and the world, then they should have the option of terminating that life, regardless of what you and i believe about what life is and isn't. I often hear all kinds of arguments for and against abortion, yet i rarely hear this taken into account, the suffering of a human being who was brought into unwanted and unloving circumstances.

I am also vegan by the way, and not because i am opposed to the killing of animals for food so much, i am opposed more to the treatment they receive while alive.

I don't pretend to have answers to questions such as what life is or isn't. But i do know what pain and suffering is. And if abortion is necessary to avoid pain and suffering, then i believe none of us have the right to the moral self-righteousness as to stop somebody. I believe the same for euthanasia and suicide. Our metaphysical bigotry is irrelevant in the issue. What we believe may or may not be true. However what truly matters to me is having the dignity to choose avoidance of pain and suffering, which beyond doubt is very very real, unlike the various "gods" and "cosmic energies" we may believe in.

So i ask you my fellow brothers and sisters to stop defending and forcing your metaphysical beliefs on real life people and situations, and letting people decide how they want to address their own lives and those of their potential unborn children.

Syndicate content

"Banish the word 'struggle' from your attitude and your vocabulary. All that we do now must be done in a sacred manner and in celebration. We are the ones we have been waiting for." — Hopi elders

Sponsored by