Ayahuasca for sale
- Login or register to post comments
- Print this page
Why is ayahuascas popularity on the rise?
I woke up at 5am this morning with a question reeling in my still dreaming mind, why has ayahuasca become so extremely popularized in western culture now. I myself had been fascinated by ayahuasca for many many years, I had participated in online communities on the subject, studied with an ayahuascero for six years, and participated in many group ceremonies and private experiences with it. I had also worked with many many other medicines, I had participated in entheogenic psychotherapy, I had participated in san pedro ceremonies, peyote ceremonies wiht the NAC and had even participated in Vilca ceremonies the infamous South American snuff; all in all I have ingested and worked in a very sacred manner with over 50 different psychoactive substances both man and plant derived over the last 20 years and each of them in my personal opinion had amazing potential and qualities of equal value to ayahuasca.
I had met with and interviewed with South African ethnobotanists and Sangomas about their use of 2cB as a sacred medicine, and as a transpersonal anthropologist and a mental health professional, as well as a healer I have spoken with many amazing healers, ayahuasceros, road men, shaman, mystics and therapists that have worked with a wide assortment of plants and chemicals as well. Each of them totting their favored medicine as a miracle capable of nearly any cure for any malady. I had spoken with ethnobotanists, pharmacologists, chemists and scientists, experts in their field, who have revealed that many of these medicines are able to either spark incredible releases of immunoglobin Ato create spontaneous remission's in cancer, and other diseases, that they are able to cure addictions to the less noble of substances and to even addictive habitual patterns of behavior. I have sat in lectures by amazing researchers on the antibiotic and antioxidant properties of entheogenic cacti many of which that rival anything previously known by men in white lab coats. I have sat and watched humble as well as arrogant men wield paranormal powers to heal and work in synergy with nature, I have seen miraculous things that twist out beliefs in what is real and what is not, into shapes that defy the imagination.
But this morning my thoughts came to Peyote and to the amazing Native American traditions that work with it in such a sacred and profound manner. the medicine they call it, Granpa... Grand father. "I don't know about any psycho-babble, ego, mystic, nonsense, but I do know that people come into the tee pee to get well and they get well." A road man once told me after a tee pee meeting. And they do, they get cured of ailments, addictions, habitual behaviors, and it brings them together as a community, as a family, where one can see grand mothers sit with 4 generations of grand children by their side. Amazing things happen in tee pee ceremonies, and I will not speak of those things here in detail because they are sacred and should be shared in a good way between people, and not in the less impersonal means that writing and publishing provides. The things that do happen however as as amazing and powerful as any ayahuasca ceremony I have ever participated in, or any other ceremony for that matter, even ones led by myself or good and trusted friend's.
So why is Ayahuasca on the top of the list in peoples minds these days? Peyote and other sacred medicines are just as effective and powerful, as are the traditional or methods of working with them. Why is not peyote; to continue with it as my main example, not popularized in the media, in spiritual circles, tourist trades as well as global ethnootanical trade. Why is peyote no the subject of reality TV shows, documentaries, and research projects by some of the worlds most astute scientists, why is peyote research not receiving, grants and being published on FOX news of all places?
This was my question this morning at 5am with my rapid thoughts spinning me out of the dream world. Why is this the case? The first thought that arose from the still dreaming state... It was never for sale. Peyote was never for sale. Yes you can buy peyote, still to this day you can buy peyote, in Canada you can buy peyote over the Internet as a live plant, in Australia, Denmark, possibly even Japan one can buy peyote plants. One can buy peyote at Phish Concerts I am sure these days. I do not mean that peyote itself was never for sale, I am referring to the tradition of working with peyote, the relationship that the North and Central American people have with peyote was never for sale. The Peyote ceremonies where never for sale. Yes people sold illegitimate peyote ceremonies to new agers and hippies from time to time, but the traditions and people who really work with peyote do not sell ceremonies. You do not pay for a ceremony in North American indigenous traditions. It is a huge taboo, and is socially frond upon and is considered the greatest disrespect to spirit. It is not done. Those that do it are not rewarded in doing so by their culture and peers in any way.
Ceremonies and traditions are a family affair, it is a tribal affair, it is not always exclusive to tribe, or ethnicity, though in some cases it can be. But many traditions and ceremonies are open through invitation to those that are drawn, and to those that need the help, people helping other people, people treating people as relatives regardless of blood. People support healers and spiritual leaders and the work that needs to be done with out having to pay for it, an almost alien concept in western society, aid is given in what ever way it can to get what must be done, done. Whether it be the gifting of money, or food, or a place to stay, any gift that will support those that need it so that the job gets done. if it costs money people pitch in, what goes around comes around. Its a very natural flow. People who do not have, get what they need regardless if they can afford it, and other alien concept in western society where you cannot have what you cannot afford applies to everything including health care. I just learned yesterday my uncle will be on a catheter his entire life because he could not afford a simple procedure that could have helped him.
In sweet S.A. however one can buy a limpia, a cleansing, one can buy a ceremony, one can buy the medicine, one can buy a retreat, and can buy the sacred teachings of a great and powerful vegetalista to teach you to go on dieta. You can pay for that, you can purchase it, you can buy it, and you can sell it, and you can make lots of money doing it as well. In Bolivia 15 students of a ayahauscero can spend 3000$ a peice for their 3 month long tutelage in working with ayahausca and san pedro, going to sacred sites ect. 45000 American dollars converts currently to 314044.40 Bolivianos that is an incredible amount of wealth in Bolivia, and its a real example of what is currently happening. We reward this in the west, good for them, its a free market, these shaman are being smart, supporting their families, reinvesting the money some times to support their communities, which is not always the case. Regardless it is theirs to sell, who are we to say what is right and wrong, right? And I am not going to. I am also not going to buy ceremonies, but that's just me.
Why wont I buy ceremonies? Well it's not because of some admiration or romanticism for other cultures, but because as a transpersonal anthropologists and a community mental health specialist I see connections and I see causes and effects every day. I have also learned a great deal about the cause and effect of not selling ceremonies in northern American indigenous communities. It build community, it builds intimacy, and allows for mutual care to occur between people. It allows people who do not have to have. For years I saw a South American shaman I studied with, who charged for ceremony turn people away or haggle with people who showed up who could not pay. Good friends could not get well because they could not afford it. It allows communities a certain amount of quality control, those who are good healers are supported, those that are good teachers are supported, those that are good leaders are supported, those are not, are not supported by the community. It is not a question of you get what you pay for. Instead it is a matter of you are supported by that which you support.
Its encouraging to know we have such a good example to learn from. So close to us.
It became very apparent to me as I thought more and more and came farther out of my dream state that the buying and selling of ayahausca and ayahausca ceremonies has made it THE greatest medicine, the most amazing and sought after medicine. The "King of Brews" as a spoof t-shirt from the 90's said in a popular psychedelic magazine. The buying and selling of ayahausca made ayahausca available to us, a society that rewards and is rewarded by a concept that everything is for sale, that not to, long ago even thought that human lives are for sale, and who still to this day have "Human Resource" personal in every cooperate office and large Non-profit organizations. Is buying and selling ayahausca ceremonies a terrible thing? Well on the one hand it has gotten it a lot of press, its spread it around the globe, where in Sweden or japan one can attend a traditional ayahausca ceremony. It may be spawning new religious and spiritual movements, social change, and new research into the mind and mind altering substances. All good things, but as with many things bought and sold in the global economy there are unforeseen costs. To continue with peyote and the peyote ceremony in North America, the unforeseen cost is family, mutual support, the maintenance of respectful relationships, and those that cannot afford what they need receiving the help they so desperately need. What value do we place on these unforeseen costs? On family or community? I think we can look around western society and say that the value we place on family and community is on a serious decline. That is not something I wish to support. I also believe that the buying and selling of ayahuasca has placed it on a pedestal, preventing us from seeing that there are other options some times right under our nose that are just as amazing and as possible in meeting our needs for healing, growth and transformation.
I do think though that it is possible for us to learn to establish communities of mutual aid in ayahuasca ceremonies, or any work with these sacred medicines, but it will take a real shift in gears to how we think of supporting each other, and building community. It will take retrofitting how we come by the medicines, and possibly working with what we can have readily available instead of just one from far away so that the cost to the community is lower. I believe that some communities such as the ayahausca religions Damie and the UDV are already participating in this dynamic, and it is very encouraging. So it can be done by people who did not grow up in a culture that practices this already.
It ayahuasca really the "king of brews" because its bought and sold as I state? Its a compelling question? Why has it become so popular, and more so then other medicines that can be as much benefit? Was my half dreaming mind correct in that it is because it is bought and sold? I am not sure... But it did get me thinking a lot about community, and what we can do to build community around these medicines in a very different way, and I would encourage every one to do so as well!
Comments
many medicines
You make a lot of interesting points. One thing that I will say about ayahuasca is that it is perhaps seen as more attainable because it is for sale. Peyote, due to its lack of sale-ness, seems perhaps more difficult to obtain.
I think all entheogens have unique specialties for healing. I have met people who have drink ayahuasca for years and are still weighed down by their ego. Yet if someone were to come to me complaining of a parasite problem, I would probably recommend ayahuasca over peyote or chemical entheogens. It is not that I don't think those other entheogens could not resolve a parasitic infection, but I believe ayahuasca has a propensity for that type of healing. Similarly, I believe peyote has a specialty in healing ancestral woundings in the lineages. I also believe utilizing a wide variety of entheogenic compounds is useful because they all work in different ways, bringing up different material. But it is curious that ayahuasca should be such the focus of much entheogenic discussion. Perhaps that is because it is simply time for the ayahuasca spirit to do a lot of work. I do not think of ayahuasca as trumping other entheogens (and I think I recall a report of someone who would take iboga and ayahuasca together and iboga would win in dominating his consciousness--although I don't think taking both at the same time is respectful to either), though ayahuasca does hold a specific mastery and is incredibly powerful.
Anyhow, I always appreciate your voice, as I feel you are lobbying for medicines to be available in people's back yards, where they are needed. It is one thing for someone dedicated to inner work to seek out a south american retreat, but quite another for a menial wage or perhaps unemployed sick person to get the soul healing they need.
I hope in the future quality entheogenic care could be more accessible to mainstream people. Although ideally I would love a money-less society where healers are supported to heal, but I am not against financial trade for healing medicinal ceremonies, as practitioners need to support themselves like anyone else. I do believe, however, that there are many karmic pitfalls in charging for spiritual services, or growing/manufacturing and selling medicines.
The Cost of Money & The Spirit of Payment
For me the overall question is the very nature of money itself. As even "medicine" is really no more sacred than food, clothing or shelter ... as all has connectedness to "spirit" ... everything ultimately having "value beyond cost."
The only way to accumulate money is to live at the expense of others ... no other way. So in any bartering system those who have the most should pay the most, simply because they have taken the most.
Those with nothing have no obligation to "pay" as they have not taken beyond their means.
If all of these modernistic "neo-humans" have all of this cash to burn they should in fact offer it back to the cultures who's very existence is threatened by such "lifestyle accumulation".
If a wise shaman does not want to take then out of wisdom he could instruct where the initiate should invest his capitol to balance out his karma of "taking at the expense of others" .. like digging wells for the village ... political lobbying against the destruction of sacred grounds etc.
In American politics the greatest tax breaks are given to the wealthiest ... causing the greatest "collective karma" of general poverty in the long run.
Those corporations who wanted to expand should be taxed the greatest as they are existing only at the expense of the environment etc, etc. ... {common sense}
The economic discussion is never really about types of currency above and beyond the reality of "paying for ownership" ...
In India the "sadhus" { yogis/saints} can ride public transportation for free because they do not accept payment for anything ... true wealth being "inherent" within everyone {dharma} and never earned at the expense of another {karma}
"Wonder is what Mystery would do if it was conscious"
"Wandering is for every other possibility"
Pippalayana Muni
A (possibly apocraphyl)
A (possibly apocraphyl) anecdote from Ram Dass comes to mind: While giving LSD to Indian gurus, he received a variety of responses: "It is good, but not as good as meditation." "It gave me a headache." "It is interesting." Etc, etc. But one guru responded by explaining that LSD was the avatar for Americans, because Americans, as a materialistic people, needed their God in a material, technological form -- God in a Pill. Also, things like Landmark, Scientology, etc. come to mind, and there have been psychological studies documenting the fact that when we pay for something, and in fact the more we pay for something, we are more likely to find it important or useful. We are to an extent both hard-wired and culturally conditioned to be economic creatures who value things with dollar-signs. The New Age movement is full of examples of this, unfortunately.
Furthermore, and I digress somewhat--
I am very troubled by the trends regarding ayahuasca ceremonies in Western culture. First of all, we appropriate cultural traditions that we do not understand, we fetishize the "Noble savage" without understanding him on his own level. We see something fundamentally wrong with our culture, and therefore try to cling to elements of other cultures which seem to contradict that which troubles us in our own, and touches some deep need left unfulfilled in our own cultural paradigms. But I feel that it is more proper for us to develop, within our own cultural context, ways of fulfilling these needs that are more fully related to our backgrounds and contexts. This work is being done with psychedelics in a Western therapeutic context, and also on an informal basis by many people who make psychedelic use a part of their lives without a great deal of emphasis on ritual, etc., as commonly or stereotypically understood (although tripping at a Dead show or undergoing psychotherapy is a sort of "ritual" in itself, as far apart as those things may be from one another or from traditional "ritual" uses of the compound). I am troubled by the emphasis on ritual and context, more or less, completely, because part of the power of psychedelics is to transcend context, to cut the proverbial Gordian knot ... I feel like trying to box them into specific cultural contexts, all the more when these cultural contexts are packaged, bought and sold, cheapens the experience and it's depth in a very fundamental and disturbing way.
I'm not knocking ritual approaches to psychedelic work, if that is what floats your boat and what leads you to the greatest possible benefit in a therapeutic or spiritual sense, then more power to you, and who am I to argue? But I think the unthinking acceptance of and emphasis on ritual does much to actually downgrade the infinite possibilities inherent in the psychedelic state.
(This is the point of view of one writer on esotericPharma.org and does not necessarily reflect the point of view of all members of the site. For more information on our project, please view our website.)
Here's why it's more popular:
it's a tryptamine, more powerful than mescaline, and also endogenous
there are many aya analogues all over the world, which are easy to obtain
and, the traditional culture around it has been explored and written about more than with peyote.
Define "powerful" as relates
Define "powerful" as relates to "mescaline" and "tryptamine." your statement doesn't make sense.
"endogenous" - yes, DMT is endogenous but, the jury is still out on Strassman's wilder theories, which I assume you are referring to,but this isn't much related
More written abou - definitely. Now we're getting somewhere. I hesitate to use the word "fad," but it does seem a little, well, faddish.
I appreciate your thought
I appreciate your thought toward the issue of payment. When I began to do healing work it was my intention to offer it as a gift. Then both my teachers and spirit guides told me it was better to ask for payment. My clients actually seem happier with this.
Ceremony, I continue to offer to the community as a gift from Spirit. I do encourage participation however....bringing poetry to share for moon ceremonies, firewood, prayers, spending time building an altar etc. Having an exchange of energy seems to be more powerful than "free."
To the first post -
-(it takes me awhile !)
I think ayahuasca is in the media not only because it has been made into a commodity that is bought, traded and sold, also because it is the "new" thing to be afraid of. The new "demon destroyer of youth" and "corrupter of public morals". The mass media require a near constant stream of things with which to generate fear in the general populace. A few years ago it was diviner's sage - Salvia Divinorum, a member of the sage family that came in for the tar and feather demonization by the media. This coincided with a push to add it to all the other banned plants. Wonderfully, the main active compounds in the plants (Salvinorum A&B) have now been identified in other species of the genus. After the Sages, the media had been all agog over the JWH series cannabinoid agonists, ("spice", "k-2") now also banned. In this case perhaps deservedly so since the marketing concerns were spraying the chemical over a mishmash of other active plants with conflicting properties.
Why not Peyote ? Well the media has done Peyote, several times over the decades to no avail. It remains a sacred medicine and ( for some) a legal sacrament. So there is no "scare story" left in Peyote.
That the NAC and native american culture has resisted successfully attempts to "package" not just the medicine, but the wisdom and the culture that wisdom supports owes much to it's embodiment as a functional "gift economy". Sadly the inverse is being proven by events in the Ayahuasca communities where all of it is being sold. There is also the observational data that confirms that Ayahuasca is indeed a powerful and effective plant ally and teacher. There are also subjective reports that Ayahuasca is more evolved that some other plant teachers. That the subjective experiences are less open to misinterpretation.
Of the desirability of removing all medicines from the hands of profit makers and nesting them in a gift economy. Well that just makes sense. Does anybody really want their health and well being held hostage to how many false coins of the realm you happen to have in your pocket?
;P eace !
" A rising tide - drowns those without boats " - Cee Are
"The object under your feet is always the dance floor " - Cee Are

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket




