Be Kind to Your Poor Ego...It isn't Easy Being the Center of the Universe, You Know

3
groks

Increasingly, the idea of Ego as Enemy strikes me as being a part of the old paradigm of dualism and opposition of apparent opposites. The Ego is not our enemy, any more than the cocoon is the enemy of the caterpillar within it.

If taken out of its proper context within the course of our development, it certainly can become a barrier to growth and progress, a suffocating prison that slowly kills the life inside...but that is not what it inherently is.

The Ego is the Egg of your Higher Self.

(Note that I do not say your True Self. Your True Self is that which is always there -- ever present, never changing, the No-Thing that is Everything. The Space in which it all arises, the Substance of which it is made, the Source from whence it came, and the Destination to which it travels.

It stands always Laughing at All That Is with the Thunderous Silence of One Hand Clapping. Call it what you will (or don't).)

Following the metaphor (and it is only that), the Ego, as we know it, was, itself, that "higher life" once protected by what we generally call instinct; which was itself a "higher life" that was once encased in chemistry, and on and on as far back as you want to trace it.

Each transcends, but includes, its predecessor as a more complex system with increasing autopoesis and ability to exercise intent .

To quote my current favorite book, The Prophet by Kahlil Gibran:

And if it is a fear you would dispel, the seat of that fear is in your heart and not in the hand of the feared. Verily all things move within your being in constant half embrace, the desired and the dreaded, the repugnant and the cherished, the pursued and that which you would escape.

These things move within you as lights and shadows in pairs that cling. And when the shadow fades and is no more, the light that lingers becomes a shadow to another light. And thus your freedom when it loses its fetters becomes itself the fetter of a greater freedom.

Once, the Ego itself was Freedom from Instinct...but, if clung to, it can become a Fetter.

Within the Ego another life grows. You can feel it, I bet, when you turn inwards...a little spark, a light that grows when it is nurtured and loved. The Ego does not fear this light -- it loves it! Day by day it tries to keep it safe over the course of our lives.

A funny thing begins to happen, at a certain point, however...that life within begins to brush against the boundaries of the Ego. This is the crisis point.

The Ego, when all is said and done, is a Reactionary Contraction. When it begins to feel this pressure, it does what it always does -- it contracts around the life it is attempting to foster. Only, now, its actions serve to smother, rather than protect -- just like the parent who will not let their child venture out on their own.

And this is the whole key: you cannot relax a contraction by contracting it further. The Ego takes far longer to 'give up' when it feels that it is under attack. Fighting back is what it does. The battle, and the perceived need for it, both give validation to the need of its existence, and so it hangs on.

This is at the heart of the Buddha's teaching that one cannot strive to be Egoless, for that striving is itself of Ego.

And Egoless is a touch of a misnomer, I believe. The Ego is no longer as -- or what -- it was, and that process of transformation does indeed feel like a death, at first especially. But what has really happened is that our sense of self has become more inclusive, not removed.

The Ego's dissolution is simultaneously it's Rebirth.

The Ego need only relax, and its own boundaries grow. A new identity begins to be born. One which, rather than contracting solely around this individual personality and body, begins rather to include others into its self identification.

The pains and pleasures -- the joy and sorrow -- of those around us begin to be experienced as our own.

First, we see our family also as 'me'. Then a group of friends as well. Then, perhaps, a culture, then a nation. Eventually, all the world is encased in our circle of 'I'. Then the Universe...it just kinda goes on like towards Eternity, as the Waves of the Infinite crash Forever upon the shores of the current limitations and boundaries of our Soul.

What I am trying to say is, treat your Ego more as you would a small child than a tyrant. It isn't evil, it just doesn't understand yet. It is scared by all of this talk of being an illusion.

Ease that fear. Help it to see.

Let it feel the joy that is mirrored within yourself when another smiles. The surge of ecstasy in the laughter of a loved one. Let it experience what the Sufis refer to as 'the Joy of Service'. Show it that the sorrow of others is echoed in you -- and let it feel the pain of its own mistakes, and consequences of its actions.

This is, too, is an important part of growth.

Let it come to know, for itself, that its reactionary nature is unnecessary, and even hampering. To understand that it will be transcended, but also included. Let it dissolve in the loving embrace of your Higher Self, happy and satisfied that All is Well in All the World.

There are, I imagine, as many different kinds of 'Higher Selves' as there are Egos, and sentient beings in the Universe. What I describe here may not correspond with everyone's ideal, either in part or in total.

At the final call, look deep within yourself, and trust what you find there.

Do what feels right, not what others tell you is correct.

This, for me, is the path with heart.

You have got to be yourself, if you are going to free your Self. Or, as the Buddha put it, "Understand that you, yourself -- as much as anything else in the Universe -- deserve your Love and Compassion."

Namaste

Image Copyright Kristin Williard. Used with Permission. All Rights Reserved

Comments

what a healer

you should consider apprenticing with an indigenous shaman for a couple years if you can swing it...our world here in tomorrow land needs more healers like you. Those Dream Change Coalition trips to Ecuador have connected many people with authentic shamans willing to share some wisdom about Earth.

Heh. I'd love nothing more

Heh. I'd love nothing more than to go have a long discussion with an Ecuadorian Shaman. ^_^ I am a poor, poor bastard, though. No monies for traveling the world...just stuck with the Infinite Within. ^_~

"You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world."
Mahatma Gandhi

Things may not exist until they are defined

...and the concept of 'Ego' really only was defined pretty recently in human existence, in 1920 by Sigmund Freud in his essay "Beyond the Pleasure Principle."

In that essay the 'ego' is considered the opposite of the instinctual nature which is defined as the 'id.' This 'ego' is self-reflective and so can be consider a 'higher' or meta-self.

In eastern religion that talks of the higher self as 'Atman' many writers such as Sivenanada define the 'ego' as connected to being closer to the lower self or 'pashu,' also defined as the animal self. Here there is a separation between intuition which is higher self knowledge and prejudice which is lower self reactive behavior.

There may be many definitions of 'ego' floating around.

But the term 'ego' may also filter our observations and experiences. We think 'I' am experiencing and so that is how we observe it. But things can be observed in a different way, and you may find many older cultures see a more symbiotic reality. It may be hard to imagine in our own self obsessed consumer culture. But we do experience it in some ways anyway like when falling in love. In experience love is something that happens together, yet our language emphasis that 'I' fall in love. And so we have two definitions for the same word, and the second definition may only exist because of the language. A great example of this is the word 'stutter.' In cultures where this word does not exist, people don't stutter. Check out the research of Wendell Johnson on this.

The phrase 'letting go the ego' may help some see a bigger picture but for others it may just be an acknowledgment that the 'ego' exists depending on how they map that into their mental constructions.

Kit Krash
Experience Lab NYC

Very nicely put. On the

Very nicely put.

On the sociological note you bring up, I wonder if they have no word for stutter because no one stutters, or no one stutters because they have no word for it?

If it is genetic in origin, mayhap that gene never made it there? Always fascinating to hear of these differences across cultural boundaries.

"You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world."
Mahatma Gandhi

nice one ChibiOne

namaste

"Conquer inner foes; triumph over your ego" -- Sathya Sai Baba

Great article!

I totally agree sir, many good points made. We can't try to kill the ego since it's a vital part of our survival. Resenting it isn't good either because resentment is, in essence an egoic process. Your final quote of the Sakyamuni's puts it the best I'd say. Best regards!

I agree...

The ego isn't bad, in fact it's a very necessary part of the whole. From a systems view, a sense of self is has to be there for any kind of onboard navigation to be functional. Also inherent in navigation is the concept of an environment that the self moves through. Seems to me that ego is present in all creatures; only a few have learned to inflate it so. 8)

Another way to look at it is that mobile species are decision making machines. We are constantly monitoring the environment, comparing it to our accumulated knowledge base and making decisions, thus navigating towards a goal. That accumulated knowledge, our belief structure, our character, has to be an unambiguous point around which action can focus. Right or wrong, the beliefs that comprise our character cannot be debated in emergencies. Confidence is a must. The ego is the point around which our consciousness pivots.

This is a similar pattern of behavior we find in coherent electromagnetic fields, (like form around cells, organs and bodies). Input into a coherent electromagnetic field is received simultaneously throughout the entire field. Conversely, the information regarding the internal dynamic of the field is available as output at the outer boundary.

In these fields, input causes an output that is not the entire volume of information contained in the field, but specific information, like an answer to a query. Seems to me that this is a very ego-like function that operates on a very fundamental level of biological information processing.

Love yer ego, just let the air out once in a while. 8)

cheers,
jim

I don't get it!

Chibione quotes Buddha to prove his point that we need to love our egos. Sanjay says we need to conquer our ego. Insomniac says its a machine. Kuntak quotes Buddha that we live in an illusion. Chibione says that scares our egos, - (being called an illusion )- but arent we egos to start with? at least that is what my psych teacher says. Who is supposed to be nicer to ego if we are ego and how can we do anything at all if all we are is an illusion? And anyway, if everybody who is not true self is ego then isn't loving your ego just loving yourself? Isn't that narcism?

Can somone Help me out here? I am totally confused.

lille

Heh. Good question. I'll

Heh. Good question. I'll try to answer it, as far as I currently understand the answer to be. =) No expert, though...still many issues of overly finite associating 'round here. ^_~

Cannot emphasize enough: When in doubt, look within and find your own answers. Only you know what is true for you.

Also: This is all just from my perspective. If I misrepresent anyone's understanding, I apologize.

First, I suppose, a working definition of Ego would be helpful, to avoid further confusion. There are quite a few definitions -- and even more implicit understandings -- of the word. For me, at this point, it means my own personality, and the identification with this body and mind, alone, as 'me'.

Just as Kuntak points out, this personality is nothing but an idea in the mind. What I refer to as a meme. Over our lives, we can see this 'idea' evolve and change.

I know for certain that my personality bears little resemblance to what it was even five years ago, for example.

This is the first clue as to the illusory nature of the idea, and hence the fallacy of identifying solely with it. So, just as Sanjay's quote implores, it is very helpful to 'conquer' this limited identification. To see through the illusion, and understand that you are not your personality, you are that which perceives that personality -- Consciousness itself, if you will.

When one begins to really delve into that Consciousness, one finds the same Consciousness looking back from everything.

It is, at this point, that one begins to understand that one is not limited to this finite being, though that is a part of what one is -- rather, one is actually All, and All is One. To be kind to others is to bring joy to yourself. To inflict harm on another is to, ultimately, do nothing but hurt your own being.

From my own personal experience with this process, however, I have found that (at least once one truly begins to grok this) the best way to 'conquer' this limited identification is to actually just relax and "let it be", as our good friends the Beatles so nicely put it. To understand that it serves a purpose, and so to let it fulfill that purpose.

Keep the understanding of illusion at the back of your mind, rest in a place of unity and compassion...but let yourself be itself. Hence, the blog. =)

The more this happens, for me (and as long as I do it resting in a place of common identity and compassionate embrace), the less I worry about this one finite being. The less I do that, the more my 'higher motivations' begin to shine through, and the more I can act upon them -- because I am not wasting energy at war within. The illusion fades on its own, over time -- because that is the nature of illusion, unless it is reinforced in some way.

Attempting to 'conquer the Ego', in the old paradigm sense of 'beating it', has, for me, ultimately only served to reinforce that Ego.

So my shit's just lettin' it go, and throwing my hands up in the air to better enjoy the rollercoaster ride. ^_^

Hope this helps.

"You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world."
Mahatma Gandhi

thanks chibione!

but I still am having trouble understanding
maybe I can break it down. that may help me get somewhere

you say ego = personality + identifying but then you seem to drop the identifying part and talk about personality, and personality alone doesn't equal ego, does it? and if it is just an idea like kuntak said? anyway, so I am looking at an idea that I just call personality and identifying and that good stuff. OK?

if I go deeper inside I find out that my consciousness is the one with the illusion. and I go even deeper and find out that I am ALL (true self?)

but then you kinda switch gears all of a sudden and start talking about being kind and 'letting it be" and the Beatles and letting yourself be yourself. this is where I get lost again. if I am ALL, then who is doing all that other stuff? and what if my 'higher motivations' lead me to doing stuff that gets me in trouble ? (you know what I mean?) What if my higher motivations want me to do drugs or something? Does that mean they weren't reall so high after all? Don't we have to follow some kinda rules? I was taught that the Devil can be very devious and we need rules to know the difference between good and bad. so you can understand my confusion. right?

and like when people write nasty things on Evolver does that mean they are not motivated by their higher selfs? is that how we can tell? sorry for being such a pest. I know I am new her and just learning, but I feel like I need to get some answers before things out there start getting really weird. so if you don't mind pls be patient. i'm a pretty good listener I think.

and did ya notice I already have five friends? I am so psyched! thanks, I could just scream! thamks, thanks! (Now i'm blushing) just a roller coaster right?

lille

Hmmm...well, you'd have to

Hmmm...well, you'd have to understand what I, personally, mean by 'higher', first off.

For me, something is 'higher' when it is more inclusive. The more of the Universe embraced within the matrix of something -- whether it be an idea, organism, piece of machinery, whatever -- the 'higher' I consider that thing. Hence my stance on compassion -- embracing all with love is about the most inclusive thing I can think to do.

But it also includes including exclusion, to a degree. Change, differentiation, are a part of the world, and any truly inclusive ideology accepts this as well. Whether or not persons who make impolite or 'mean' comments are motivated by their 'higher intentions' (which, by my definition, seems unlikely in most cases), still it is 'higher' to allow a place for them to explore that side of themselves...within reason, of course. I believe in rules as well.

Or, more accurately, organizing principles. Any thing that wishes to be a part of something must follow certain behavioral guidelines in order to do so in a healthy manner. If it doesn't wish to follow those guidelines, then it is free to go elsewhere and find something more akin to its own nature to be a part of.

So, if you were driven to take drugs in order to expand your consciousness and learn to love yourself and others, then I would say it was your higher motivations bringing you to do so. If you were doing so simply for your own pleasure or to gain power, then it is likely you are being driven by the fear that accompanies associating oneself entirely with this individual and personality...because, if even on an instinctual level, you know it won't last.

But there are no hard and fast rules here.

And, it is very true, that the True Nature cannot be gone against. In the end, all that we do is from our True Self, and all is as it should be. But a part of that is our drive to learn, differentiate, grow, and change. And, thus, these must also be included. It is around this point that the literal and linear nature of language becomes a barrier. Every statement appears to contradict. This is due to the Infinite nature of Infinity...you can't encapsulate it in any one word, idea, thing, action, etc, because it is them all, and all of them are in It.

The reason I switch gears is because, for many people, once this idea has been given to them their first reaction is to begin to get down on themselves about having a personality, or identifying too selfishly. It must be understood that the Ego is an illusion in the way that a wave upon the ocean is an illusion: it looks like it is something different, and separate...but follow it to its base, and you find that it is actually simply a ripple upon a vast body of water. No two alike...no two really different, on any fundamental level.

So, I say accept both sides of it equally. We are all one...but we are all different. Each side of that is a pure, beautiful manifestation of That-Which-Cannot-Be-Named-Because-It-Is-Too-Big-For-Words. ^_~

Basically, I say it comes from your higher self when it is an inclusive drive, motivated by -- or at least taking into consideration of -- the good of others as well as this finite self.

Also, these ideas of 'higher' and 'lower' should very much be understood as relative values. That is, they only have any existence during comparison. Something that is 'higher' is not necessarily 'better', in any absolute sense -- any more than, going back to our earlier metaphor, a Tidal wave is more wet than its smaller brethren.

To use another metaphor, the Oak Tree may be more developed than the acorn, but you can't say one is better than the other...for without either you have neither.

It is simply a sometimes-useful concept when navigating and learning about the world, not an excuse to hurt, exploit, or control in any way whatsoever.

Hopefully I have not confused you further. =P

"You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world."
Mahatma Gandhi

I am sooo embarrassed!!! I knew I knew that guy from somewhere!

that's rudy crowe! I know I am not supposed to say anything bad and no telling if
i am being higher or lower motivated, but oh my god!!
that guy lives alone way up on Dow mountain NOT TEN MILES AWAY FROM ME.
I am just so lucky i decided to use a bogus name and picture so he can never guess who I am. I know its bad to spread rumors, but if you knew what people in town say, well like i said i don't want to spread anything bad, but oh my god. so i am just going to stop now and go figure it out with my crew at school and maybe I can come back later and learn som more

meantimes chibione i think you are awesome even if i have trouble understanding what you are trying to explain. that guy was right! you really are a healer! and mr crowe, i apologize for losing my cool, but oh my god!

lille

just discovered this post

and it is so great =)

you are great!

love
Susan

Syndicate content

"Banish the word 'struggle' from your attitude and your vocabulary. All that we do now must be done in a sacred manner and in celebration. We are the ones we have been waiting for." — Hopi elders

Sponsored by