Communicating external awareness (politics, law, journalism?)

Do we recognize that there is private and public trust running parallel in today's society? Do we know that we are not the name of this thing we use to interact with one another? But that we are the animators, observers; i.e. Trustees. Granted trust over this name. Which is granted by a 'private' authority to grant civil rights to sue and be sued within this system; this 'public' system.

Since we are not the Grantors behind the system do we or can we ever expect to have the power and ability to change the system? If you're continuously subject to it's laws, how can you author any?

And they say that ignorance of the law is no excuse. If you can't know them all and ignorance is no excuse, why would you remain subject?

To me everything comes back to this governmental Stockholm syndrome we've all been subjected to from the time we were born. Since that day our every moment on this earth has been training to be subject-citizen-debtor-slaves. The system cannot teach you anything other than that or it ceases to exist. As long as you operate as an agent inside that system, you can called upon at anytime to be a tool for the system. Indeed some people built illustrious careers around this mode.

Most people want to be comfortable and be left alone. So they retreat into or construct self made wombs to shelter and protect themselves from reality. The reality that we are not alone and while on this planet trapped here together no one is ever going to be left alone or entirely comfortable without a cost or expense to someone else. This is a monumental responsibility that very few want so they hire someone else to do it for them. Be it politicians or attorneys or any other place they receive programming from the system. All of which has but one purpose; to divide.

So can you intermingle or interfere with the operations of 'private' institutions that are all agencies of the system?; and expect to balance inequities? The intermingling of public and private law is like oil and water, it doesn't mix. The real solution is to not be 'public'. Get out of the public venue where you're subject. Get to the private where you author-ize and control.

Albeit fallacy, there are seemingly two kind of 'freedom' being perceived by the masses. The most popular is the extent of freedom they have when it's granted to them; versus freedom at the cost of accepting personal responsibility whereby they are the Grantor/Author; not subject. I myself am unsure as to what Evolver is looking for but I see little indication of the latter. If it's the former, then there's only so far one can go.

I don't see a 'changing' of the rules of the game. The way I see it there are rules for playing the game and there are rules for NOT playing the game. Most people who would rather not play the game, but then will deny the rules for not playing, meaning they're still playing. So it's really more like two games which can be likened to the public and private trust. If you don't want to play the public game; you have to play the private.

More than occasionally someone may reach this plateau spiritually and deny the commercial and want to declare their 'freedom' via fiat. It's definitely a necessity to be spiritually free. You simply cannot be free if you can't think it. But for some this is a dangerous place as well. Denial of ones own commercial involvement doesn't divest one of subjugation if they haven't come out and stopped playing that public game inside someone elses Re-public; i.e made public again. Right, so you can spin your wheels as long as you want to and be made and remade public over and over without harm to private international juristic persons, no problem.

I don't really know what Evolver wants, I only know what I want and established my intention and set my vector to accomplish this.

"Seek not abroad, turn back into thyself, for in the inner man dwells the truth..."