Opensource Society and Neighbourhood-Networking

To get the most out of Evolver, create your profile now!
8
groks

The Earth is undergoing the largest mass extinction since the Late Cretaceous period some 65 million years ago. Every ecosystem is being stressed beyond its capacity, at the same time every area of human society is undergoing chronic systematic decay and disintegration, collapsing under its own inelegance and hubris.

To many this strikes fear and deep anxiety into the very core of their being. Much of peoples' identity is tightly interwoven within the existing social fiction. As it coughs and splutters many cannot help but cling dearly to their crumbling ideologies, for when one's reality is shattered one is presented once more with emptiness. Yet all things come from the void of emptiness and within emptiness is a fullness which renews one's self and one's World. It is the fear of emptiness that has created so much suffering as people have fled from themselves outwardly into the World neglecting the inner World. As Carl Jung said, people will do anything, no matter how absurd to keep from facing their soul. The outer World is the only World that many know, but it cannot be saved, it can only be let go of and once it is let go of one becomes the World.

The issues humans face are not contained within politics, economics, science or religion, but within the level of awareness which society has cultivated. A level of awareness which has separated people from each other and from Earth. Only when the basic psychological fault is addressed may there be any progress within an ecological framework. With this comes a shift away from the external sphere to an internal focus, a movement from having to being.

From this time of chaos comes tremendous opportunity to reinvent oneself and one's World. If one can only see the World as a trainwreck then that represents one's own self-becoming as the shadow projected onto the World, if one see's only opportunity then one has become blinded to the suffering of others. It is easy to polarize between being a pessimist or optimist, but more than anything people need to be fearless, proactive and pragmatic by taking responsibility for their thoughts and actions.

The establishment can only exist so long as people give their power away to an external authority. A free man or free woman cannot be controlled because they are not afraid. That is why the establishment being a reflection of the individual ego always seeks to covertly terrorize citizens into wilful submission by inciting fear and violence to justify its own existence. The media has become awash with information and disinformation both of which distract people with the time consuming filtering required to discern what is actually happening. The principle method of social engineering is through pre-loading a given outcome into peoples minds, perception management. Language is a very powerful tool for manipulating people, but if one can harness the power of language to expose lies as lies then a more egalitarian memeplex may result. Ideologies are powerhouses of control, for every ideology there should be an opposite to balance the equation.

What is the wildcard, what is the pandoran technology that undermines the existing power structures? You are using it now, it is The Internet. This technology is not only joining people together virtually, but also psychically as self-similar ideas find their way into social hubs online. The Internet is an alternative lifestyle and it facilitates a pluralism that conventional society cannot accommodate. The human species is fundamentally different from the days before mainstream Internet uptake. The Internet has recalibrated peoples' minds, created a new economy and layer of social organization. It has connected people in new ways yet alienated them from the immediacy of the World around them. It has created a new level of information transparency, social awareness and activism.

Can this chaotic technology be put back in the box, can it be unplugged? The Internet appears to be the emerging cybernetic brain of a superorganism which humanity is collectively constructing. Is a two-tiered Internet really feasible? How can the social domain and corporate domain really be pulled apart when they have coalesced as one? Could the Internet be shutdown indefinetly using a killswitch or would that not just cause issues to boil to the surface of the social fabric? The establishment have openly expressed their concern for national security from cyberthreats and coordinated actions against them. The establishment has everything to lose, the people have everything to gain. Perhaps a powerful electromagnetic pulse could take the Internet down, but in doing so it would take all electronic technology down.

If indeed the Internet is an emerging superorganism, then just like a fertilized egg it must merge and divide to build upon itself. At this stage Internet usage should become more holonic by focusing on distributed local nodes of network activity in order to support a more tribal organization and mobilize people to take action locally in an opensource society.

The ideas about to be presented are controversial and haven't been fully ratified. Instead of social-networking there could be neighbourhood-networking using GPS technology. For example any resident within a street could have access to information about their neighbours, not just trivial data that people pour into Facebook, but statistics which can be used for policy making and event planning by the community. The idea being that it encourages people to get to know their neighbours and come to agreements amongst themselves without necessarily requiring an outside authority.

If for example someone was abusing the waste management policy then they could incur some penalty agreed upon by the group. Persistent offenders would be moved to a community which reflected more their personal ethos. Ofcourse there would need to be some outside authority to deal with disputes and coordinate the goals of proximal communities, but it shouldn't need to be given significant power. The idea is that if people are organized within small neighbourhoods then problems remain manageable. If such an autonomous, opensource and self-policing intranet were developed then it would alter peoples' social organization to co-adapt with it. It would empower the core economy through relocalization and data transparency allowing people to build trust and develop social capital.

The currency of the future is one of interconnectedness, of service to others. Those who are buying guns and ammo and taking off to the woods are going to die. People cannot survive without someone else, what if the person falls ill and needs medical assistance for example? When all the civil unrest and chaos ensues from the collapsing of the existing infrastructure it will be communities that stand strong in the face of adversity.

Comments

Authority Outside

"Preloading a given outcome into peoples minds, perception management." As I train Magi, the white german shepard, up here in the hills of Northern California, listening to Planet Drum quite LOUD I know my guns are "Pre-Loaded. At peace, aging, I don't use the media to know what is happening. I don't go looking for trouble anymore nor does it find me. I have more than enough "ammo" both physically & mentally. Be not fearful of everyone with guns, ammo, medical assistance if needed, knowledge of the desert, woods, forest, sea, tropical jungle etc. We may be the ones that survive. I don't take offense that I am being told I will die. We all die. Ain't no way out man!
But we don't. I am not afraid of anything except experiencing the day no more children are born. To think, I have no children. Hey, you and your loved ones are welcome to share my campfire any time. As long as you're not "The Law"
Peace, K.

Yep, hear what you're

Yep, hear what you're saying. I understand peoples' desire to defend themselves, it is just such an apocalyptic situation when everyone is armed to the teeth just to feel safe, but hey that is what nations have been doing since their inception to protect themselves from conquest. I'd like to think that be returning to more of a tribal lifestyle people could build communities and not fear being stabbed in the back by their neighbours, fear begets violence, trust begets love.

All the best,

M

"Tribal lifestyle"

That is what i'd like to see. I can say that it surely is the people in fear, toting guns, with no respect for the lives of animal or human, nor respect for the weapons they tote and ignorance of the big picture that I fear the most. Trust is something earned and fear seems to be generated everywhere I look. I don't want to come off sounding like some kind of militant but said fear is fed to hungry mouths by our government through our electronic devices and the media.
I put love into the universe I recieve love back. Love Begets love. I feel the apocalyptic situation arrived ahead of me? I also must say, and this may sound crazy, I have connected with some people over the internet very deeply and at first it blew my mind. I now embrace it and have found yet another place to live, learn, & love. I so enjoy discussing topics, beliefs, views, etc with others that can intelligently, with open mind, just chat. No hard feelings, no argueing, just talkin'. I truly enjoy it here in Evolver. I enjoy feedback and am hungry for new ideas on simple LIVING. I was in H.S. when I experienced my first Hippie commune for a month in RedWood country of NorCal. I have been around the world and find the internet a gift to talk with other communities and cultures instantly. Still amazed at the rapid information delivery. Thank you for taking the time to respond to my reply.
Smile, for those that forgot how to. K.

Skype Conversation?

I'd love to talk with you some time about these themes.

My Skype is LionKimbro, but I don't "hang out" on there -- I usually arrange a conversation with someone first by email, and then log in to Skype to talk. What's your email? Mine is LionKimbro at gmail.

I used to put a lot of energy into these kinds of thoughts -- I was working on OpenSource software, wiki technology, and imagining "How can the online world self-organize and connect with the material world?"

I think I continued with that thought from, say, 2001, through 2008. But then I experienced a major change thinking: "It's not going to work" -- at least, not exactly as envisioned here. I started doing more offline work and engaging with people in an embodied way. Don't get me wrong -- I love computers and the Internet -- I've been programming since I was 6 years old. But there are a number of limitations, and those limitations will persist for at least a decade or two still.

Besides, it's not about the wires; It's about what we say and do with one another. That the Internet collapses access to a point is valuable, is meaningful, but the stage is still time and the acts are still words and motions.

If you look at the Tameran vision of Healing Biotopes, or the Damanhurian vision of Spiritual Greenhouses around the world, you will see the nodal growth pattern reflected over again.

I'd love to talk with you at greater length -- I've been in Collective Intelligence circles for a while, and I think you and I would both find a lot of value in our conversation.

Thanks, Lion

Hi Lion, I've added my

Hi Lion,

I've added my contact details at the end. Yeah I agree with you, I can't help but feel however that peoples' souls are being sucked into a transhuman World before they know what happened to them. I totally agree about the nodal growth pattern, it makes sense too. Life seems to be this process of ambiguous merger and division to create new fractal patterns of self-similarity.

Cheers,

Skype: miles.hingston
Email: miles.hingston [at] gmail [dot] com
Website: mileshingston.com

tech tendancies

totally agree with you on the tendancy to polarize for most people .

The idea about shutting down the internet with some kind of killswitch was employed in Egypt during the winter 11 uprising,no ?

alienation from grounded physical sensory experience seems to be the norm of the newer generations that have grown up with internet , along with alienation of society that is not online imo , to the point where most wouldnt necassarily care to take part in the immediate community.
From my experience most are happy to meet their basic indivdual needs and it takes a special type of person to even want to go above and beyond that ... i wonder why that is ?

Yep, the net was shutdown in

Yep, the net was shutdown in Egypt, it facilitated the uprising and became a threat to the establishment. However "they" cannot pull the wool over peoples' eyes for very long. If the Internet is shutdown in Egypt then outside media soon starts taking interest in the situation because it create a blackhole. There are too many people out there who can see enough of the big picture and I feel that if the Internet were shutdown globally it would force issues to the surface. Our society is driven by information and without that people will be forced to organize themselves in other ways.

I agree with what you say about the lack of intimacy that technology has created. It seems somewhat ironic that the Internet has become the tool for people to escape from other people. You can extrapolate this trend and many more to see where it is all going, transhumanism.

I kinda hope that if we can steer the Internet towards local community focus then it would affect peoples' social organization, but perhaps most have dehumanized beyond that potential.

Totally agree on the last part you wrote, I think it goes back to dehumanization in all its guises.

Interesting thoughts and

Interesting thoughts and controversial indeed...

Will there be a Law or constitution in this idea of yours or will it all be according to what each "neighborhood" agrees? and what if the surrounding neighborhoods do not agree? and what about privacy? yeah what is privacy you may ask in this day and age but ppl right now choose what to share or not to and with this "system" that would be impossible; which isn't necessarily bad but it sure is controversial.

I understand you are not proposing this as the panacea but it seems to me that you can change the setting and the rules of the game but the players stay the same... maybe in addition to giving more power to the internet we should do more research on our behaviors and keep biases in check because if like you say there it'll be the need of some outside authority it sounds to me like a federal government vs. states., hence conflict of interest.

SeRgIo

Syndicate content

"Banish the word 'struggle' from your attitude and your vocabulary. All that we do now must be done in a sacred manner and in celebration. We are the ones we have been waiting for." — Hopi elders

Sponsored by