The Theory of Megamind

12
groks

A re-post, for Landar, who has brought my family and I many smiles in his time on Evolver. :)

The Theory of Megamind
by Meg Rivers

Mind is everywhere, an intrinsic quality of the universe. It is omnipresent and it is free. In existence there is only One Mind.

The One Mind knows everything in its universe because it is everywhere. Life is mind embodied. When embodied, or enclosed in a vacuum, it is cut off from whatever was "remembering" its previous existence. It only knows that it knows. It is a newborn babe.

It cannot be a coincidence that outer space is one such vacuum.

Our bodies are another. Humans and animals have very short life spans and we die, thus releasing the vacuum seal where our memories are kept separate, and then poured back somehow into the One Mind before we are able to ascertain the greater meaning behind our lives.

Bacteria, however, are ancient life forms that have stayed alive for a very long time. They are able to keep the same piece of mind closed in for billions of years by making a copy of themselves before they die, thus preserving that precious seal. They remember; the piece of mind remembers. Mind seeks to retain (once embodied) what it has learned over time so that its knowledge, or information, will compound. Thus the bacteria (or microbial life) in our world are older, smarter, and wiser than anything we have imagined.

One-celled organisms have consciously created us on a biological level. The bodies of all complex life forms on Earth are composed of trillions of cells, each cell a group of individually conscious (and labor-specific) bacteria, each doing its job with one purpose in mind: to shelter and protect themselves, which made you. The bacteria that resided in Earth's early ocean are some of the same bacteria that have evolved to reside in our intestines. We are the result of billions of years of microbial evolution based on cooperation - their machine. They built us to function as both a vehicle and a computer, made in their image and then elaborated upon. We, in turn, are creating computers in our own.

This theory brings up the question on the origins of our consciousness. Our bodies are a colony of cells working together for survival, but WE are not the bacteria. Humans have always felt that WE are separate from our physical bodies, that they are not US. So what are WE, and how did WE come to be?

The answer lies at a tipping point, the magic of critical (or initial) mass. When enough beings (like the cells in your body) put their minds to use (with the same intention) in a closed environment (a vacuum), their energies begin to build weight in that space. (Hence the desire of religion to build grand chambers "to house" God with beautiful ceilings that echo. This is why singing with other people can be a transcendent experience.) As the number of beings - with this intention, in this space - increases, their combined energies will at some point reach a critical mass and ignite or implode, thus creating beings with a new, higher, level of consciousness: Superminds. Mind is embodied by this implosion sparked at the critical mass. It is thus that new souls are created. Your soul = your enclosed mind.

Every particle that has ever existed on this planet (or any other) is a mind. Each particle, as a group, has gone through an entire spectrum of culture and reached the extent of their society. When each particle group reaches a certain critical mass of consciousness (or physical weight of ideas) - across most or all of its population - a Supermind is created. One more notch on the karmic wheel (or nautilus shell) of life – the next size group of minds begin at the same place, but higher, and a wall is created which shuts off the previous generation’s knowledge. From the quark to the atom to the bacteria to our cells to us, the same scenarios and stories have been passed down from turn to turn of the wheel. Some of our stories and myths may be our own, some of them may be theirs, and most of them are probably both. Each new generation of mind tries not to make the same mistakes (but inevitably may), because ALL minds are the same mind. It is only due to their individual observances and how each particular body responds to environment that differences arise.

Complex animals are composed of eukaryotic cells. Eukaryotes are composed of bacteria that cooperated during times of scarcity to form a larger, and more versatile organism: the cell. [They are now our organelles.] Eukaryotic cells created US by repeating the cycle that created them, by dividing up physical labor, allocating more strenuous jobs to other - and perhaps less intelligent – cells (or particles) that were good at certain tasks (reflecting light, carrying oxygen or other heavier molecules, receiving audio, etc.). It is no coincidence that the multi-cellular organism functions at the cellular level exactly as does the division of labor in humans. It is also no coincidence that amoebas, when faced with a shortage of resources, will cooperate for survival and behave like the immune system of a multi-cellular being.

At some point, all those cells cooperating harmoniously together gave rise to a new mind: US.

They are us and we are them, but we are bigger, and therefore have the power to observe more. One-celled organisms are composed of particles that are already Supermind. The simple cell enclosing those particles reached a new level: Supramind. Those cells cooperated to create our complex cells: SuperSupramind. We are SupraSuperSupramind...for the sake of discussion let's call us Megamind, as there is no way to be certain how many minds have come before us.

Now that we know we are Megamind, it creates a new question: What does mind want? What is it trying to do? Or better yet, what is the purpose of life?

Let's start here: if the One Mind knows everything and is omnipresent, why would it seek separateness, or allow a part to separate from its greater self?

It may not know where its ultimate source lies; it only knows what it has observed from its physical vantage.

Two minds are better than one, because they have different perspectives. Each mind strives to gain enough knowledge to become a Supermind, and flow to a new place where it might learn more. There is always a greater mind to merge into, an infinite source of mind. Mind behaves like water, always seeking its source, always trying to find a way to get out of whatever universe has enclosed it so it can be free in the end, if there is one. It is possible that it knows no more than we do, but has one major advantage: it can observe much more.

This process of smaller minds creating Superminds eternally perpetuates itself in our universe and beyond, on scales and in sizes unthinkable. One becomes two, and those two work together to create more. Each mind spawns a new universe using whatever materials were with it when it became closed off. The existing universe expands as each universal body within it grows, just as one cell (once fertilized by the joining of two, whose union clearly create the spark for Megamind, our embryo) divides and grows into a new baby, who gets bigger and spreads outward with each passing year.

Once on a higher level than everything in existence, wouldn't the very first Supermind (or universe) then have found itself alone? It would have. It encompassed the many small minds that created it and cannot communicate with them (YET). How would it ever get to Supramind, if that requires the cooperation of at least one other Supermind (or universe) like itself that does not yet exist?

Supermind begins at some point the process of making a copy of itself, perhaps at the moment of implosion or ignition.

The big bang was our universe's first division. Like bacteria, and like DNA. Perhaps the implosion itself is an initiator protein bubble. A black hole is likely the last bit of a universe as it separates, sucking the last important copy of information into the twin universe on the other side.

Thus we exist in a Multiverse, as the original universe grows and divides on an immense and very slow scale. However, it is possible that each universe (or cell) is unable to divide perfectly and completely (or simply has not yet had enough time to do so) and the division between the two becomes infinitely stretched, causing all universes to be connected by at least a tiny string. Some early universes must be so tiny that they seem like the ends of the string. It is also possible that (much like in cell division) the copy has a mutation, making it difficult to ascertain that it is in fact a copy.

Last thoughts: where do the new minds come from? They had to have existed previously. And where does our Megamind go when we die? Perhaps the fact that these two questions remain implies that they answer one another. It is likely that energies are simply recycled until the group is ready for the merger into a larger mind.

WHAT I PROPOSE

I propose an application of the paradigm of cell division to the processes of physics, to further an understanding of both the cosmos and the atom. It is my belief that cell division is the base model for all life on this planet and beyond, and that all things are to some degree alive or possess mind. It is also my belief that taking a closer look at random walk, or the movement patterns of bacteria, may shed light on the shape of the multiverse. I also feel it would be scientifically beneficial to take a different approach to examining the differences (and similarities) between crystal and cell structure.

Scientists believe that Earth’s early atmosphere was red, like Mars. It is my belief that the conditions for life do not spring up spontaneously on a planet, but rather are created by life on the planet as it changes and grows. The first forms of life here were anaerobic bacteria which changed into creatures who could photosynthesize using light; it was only then that the sky turned blue. I theorize that each planet is terra-formed by a life force, and that atmospheres are created by the life force to serve its own purpose. Venus was the planet terra-formed before us, and Mars will be the next.

It is a working theory of biology that our individual cells are actually specialized bacteria (or a similar microbe) that, along with the ancient and highly evolved bacteria residing in our guts, are conscious and able to communicate with one another. Scientists in the field of molecular biology are already trying to decipher their language, in the field of quorum sensing. I am proposing that we change the paradigm of medical science to include the possibility that our cells (and the cells of every being) are conscious in the same way that we are, and accept the possibility that they may already understand human language, and are able to contact us by accessing video, audio, and sensory information already stored in human language: The Voice of God.

I also believe that bacteria become virulent (in some cases) when their host dies. They hope that another colony will grant them entry into their world. They are harmful because they are desperate and hungry, which causes them to be resentful of bacteria that do have a home (and an army to protect them). Spirochetes, some of the earliest forms of life, aren't efficient workers by themselves, and no one wants them. They cause some of the deadliest diseases in life because they are being phased out, much like criminals in our own communities. I believe that we need to find virulent strains a more suitable environment; perhaps they need to be accommodated rather than punished so that we can all coexist.

I am also proposing that most beings are a type of sea creature, plant, or fungal hybrid bacterial colony. Relatively simple multi-cellular organisms such as sponges, arthropods, and coral were some of the first animals to evolve in the early ocean. At the Cambrian explosion, more complex multi-cellular organisms show up in the fossil record, great in number and disproportionately diversified. I propose that these early, structurally simple animals fused themselves together to build a super-organism that could crawl out of a difficult sea - the first mobile land animal, intelligently designed. We evolved on land from this point, and cephalopods are the evolutionary pinnacle of the minds that stayed behind. I believe that our teeth may be descendents of parasitic arthropods (which molt like spiders), and that our other body parts might have a much closer relationship to the sea than previously believed.

It is also possible that the cells in our retina or iris are plant-like (or cyanobacteria-like) in origin, as they have the ability to use light. I propose that the scientific community accept the possibility that some (or all) plants have the ability of sight (assuming they have a center of intelligence somewhere to process it) or at least can sense form and color, and that camouflage and mimicry of other species is a direct result of them taking the shape of what they have observed (orchids and stinkhorns being the most obvious examples). The universe acts as a mirror; it takes the form of whatever it observes (past or present) from its vantage. This would explain the DNA phantom effect observed in physics.

Thus, it is my belief that cells consciously change in response to their environment, at least in the capacity that they are physically able to over time and with the exertion of effort. While natural selection is a major force determining the evolution of life on this planet, it is not the only.

Update: Scientists have recently determined that the skin of cuttlefish and octopi has photoreceptors and can in essence "see" with every cell, read here: http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/6/5/600.full

Also that the entire outer skin of a sea urchin is one big eye, read here: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/05/110502-sea-urchins-eyes-...

And my work is as-of-yet-unpublished, in which I introduce the topic of allegorical sight and intelligence in orchid species.

Comments

Sight

Hi Meg. I absolutely loved this. I see a sparkling, shining world of pristine intelligence working within and beyond every single form of existence. I think only a scientist with real love for their subject could discover the consciousness living within single-cell organisms. There's such a living, fluidic movement between life and Mind. I believe this paradigm would change the sense of where and how consciousness lives and operates in our universe.

There is so much here that touches on the content of esoteric thought about the expansion of consciousness to primal states of awareness. But most of all I believe it brings the world alive again - it certainly goes beyond the sterile debate between creationists and evolutionists - by placing creative, even playful, consciousness right in the center of the single cell. Communicative consciousness, in fact. Ah, communication! That's surely what's lacking in current perceptions of physical life. I think you could go very far with the concept of communicative mind in every single organism. (In fact, I can see a theory of communication opening up which would also embrace human life.)

Is it too much to think we might tap into this Mind in a telepathic way? That brings us to the question - as you pointed out - of where Mind starts and ends, where it exists. And then of course the question of whether it exists outside of life altogether. Do we remain in it after death?

But it's the overcoming of the static elements in physical existence that I like most. Intelligence as we know it at the moment always bumps against limits and boundaries. In a way it only knows death. Your theory allows for the transmission of the kernel of life in its most essential form: intelligence or mind. I think this is a most open-ended theory - it doesn't serve to close things down as so many directions in science seem to do.

These comments are rather impressionistic and colored by my own way of looking at things. Also I'm not a scientist. In fact I've been looking for something that would make me feel friendly to science again - something that would return life to the living instead of sealing it up in jars. Your theory seems to do that. I think you could go very far with these elements of life-mind-communicativeness.

Thanks for your nice comments. I look forward to finding allegorical sight and intelligence in every species!

Landar to me telepathy may

Landar to me telepathy may have to do with microbial transmission, or contagion. I've been working on a dream theory of infection for 2 years now, and in April our Evolver Spore will host a sleep-in. Muah ha ha ha hah a.

“An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come.”-Victor Hugo

MegaWow

Meg, i believe you may have presented to us a glimpse into the nature of our current evolutionary crisis.

An eastern sage once succinctly stated "Mind is maya." (maya meaning illusion). Shunyamurti has told us of a Mega-Illusion, the Mahamaya.

Is Matter actually Mind-Stuff? Is the material universe, the Body, the sub-reality of the Great Mother? Is Matter Psyche(Mater, Mother)? And if we all share the same Physis, do we also share in the same Psyche?

From here we may differentiate Mind and Consciousness.

The activity of the material universe is emanating from the activity of the more immediate (but ultimately unreal) psychic universe. And so we see that all of creation is the imagination of the universe, and thus the Body is literally the Dream of the Mind.

This activity, in eastern tradition, is called lila (leela?) which means The Play or Game of God, the game of hide and seek the One plays with itself. It is said that God covers himself in the veils of Maya and so does not ultimately realize Himself as long as this unconscious activity is going on.

Through meditation the yogi seeks to gradually still the waters of the mind and merge his consciousness with the Beloved, which is to say he must eventually transcend the Mahamaya and attain the super-conscious, the Supreme Real.

I'll end with a cool quote from a book called Compassion in Action:

"A Buddhist monk once said: "He who clings to the void and neglects compassion does not reach the highest stage. But he who practices only compassion does not gain release from the toils of existence. He however who is strong in the practice of both, remains neither in samsara nor in nirvana." p11

Amazing responses. Is

Amazing responses. Is Matter actually Mind-Stuff? Is the material universe, the Body, the sub-reality of the Great Mother? Is Matter Psyche(Mater, Mother)? And if we all share the same Physis, do we also share in the same Psyche?

You're blowing my mind with these thoughts guys. Is Matter the Mater the Mother? And is Pattern (Energy) the Pater the Father?

“An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come.”-Victor Hugo

Love all of this thank you

Love all of this thank you especially the buddhist monk quote!!“An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come.”-Victor Hugo

This is so good!

...that I'm not sure I even know what you're talking about. But I like it!

unfathomable

Last spring, I prepared an ayahuasca analogue using Syrian Rue and Mimosa Hostilis. I accidentally took a massive dose and distinctly remember coming into direct contact with what I felt utterly convinced was the Eschaton, which i had heard about from Terence Mckenna. Shunyamurti puts our immanent crisis, as I glimpsed it, into better words than i dare say i ever could. If you haven't read this, please do.

http://www.realitysandwich.com/ecstasy_and_escaton

Also this:

"The Source of mind is Supramental Intelligent Presence. In full surrender to the eternal, immovable Presence, the world itself dissolves.

The unsurpassable sage Sri Ramana Maharshi often proclaimed that to the gyani (one who knows the ultimate truth) there is no world. There are no others. No creation has ever occurred. This is the perennial doctrine of Ajata-all is uncreated appearance. Time and space are both illusions. Even the most sublime notion of God is an illusion. The Supreme Real is not a being." Shunyamurti, Beyond the Anguish of Impossibility

"The Absolute Unity, which is the Absolute Beauty and Absolute Love, loves its Beloved so intensely it leaves not a trace of themselves. For in reality there is only the Beloved, only loving." ~Meher Baba

"A disciple once asked Ramana Maharshi why he didn't preach his message to the world. He replied, "Have you not heard of the saying of Vivekananda, that if one but thinks a noble, selfless thought even in a cave, it sets up vibrations throughout the world and does what has to be done-- what can be done?" Yatri, Unknown Man p229

The Theory of Megamind

That was the most clear, direct, intense and densely packed chunk of coherent relevant information i have encountered. Shines like a crystal in itself.

Thank you much for your

Thank you much for your comments. This is the beginning of my life's work as it unfolds in a hopefully very scientific fashion. I'm just going to take it where it would like to go.

And communicative consciousness Landar, yes this is a word I was missing.

“An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come.”-Victor Hugo

In Defense of Reincarnation and Shared Intelligence

Dear Meg,

Wow...this is great, really its amazing. I think that there is really something to be said here in regards to the quantification of your concept of 'mind'. Because just like a jigsaw puzzle can't be defined by a solitary piece, I think that we all have a stake in the universal conscience, the collective, or the singularity. (depending on your preference) But the issue really becomes what are the individual pieces of this much larger puzzle made out of? And also how many finite pieces are there within the box?

My personal thought is that everything can be quantified through the laws of regarding the conversation of energy and of matter (thermodynamics). And thus, given the limited amount of matter and energy within our given space. (Lets take for example, Columbia MO). It stands to reason that the amount of 'Mind' is relative only to the size of the population...since we are all made of an astronomical yet finite number of (possibly self-aware) cells, once these cells die and return to source elemental material (factoring out migration) it can be assumed that the new life cells will be created out of that same previously dead material. And if that material retains it's 'mind' or 'intelligence' then it doesn't necessarily become an matter of 'collective thought' but more so a question of "How smart is a carbon molecule?" Or "How much Oxygen and Hydrogen does it take to screw in a lightbulb?"

The reason the cows of certain areas are considered sacred is that they eat the grass that grows of the ground where the ancestors are buried. And so it stands to reason that a fattened ox is said to be carrying more of the essence of 'mind' from the previous generation.

I'm trying not to confuse myself, but in parting I think that your finger is dancing around the rim of the glass that holds the Waters of Life as we know them to be. Keep digging or resonating (preference) and eventually I'm sure we will all come to the same general conclusion.

Great job! :)

C - Thank you kindly for

C -

Thank you kindly for reading! I've enjoyed having your commentary. Be sure to join our regional group if Evolver is something you enjoy.

But the issue really becomes what are the individual pieces of this much larger puzzle made out of? And also how many finite pieces are there within the box?

This is definitely the question, one I can't claim to be able to tackle in my present moment. I believe that our finality can be defined only in terms of the end of our spherical earth, but beyond that, what are we a cog in that we cannot yet see? And will we in our current form ever be able to see it? These boundaries may be much more or less defined than we are able to determine.

I hope that you will continue to bring your insights to our local Spore, we felt that you were useful in our discussion of a very difficult topic and we look forward to having your perspectives in the near future!

Meg :)

“An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come.”-Victor Hugo

Syndicate content

"Banish the word 'struggle' from your attitude and your vocabulary. All that we do now must be done in a sacred manner and in celebration. We are the ones we have been waiting for." — Hopi elders

Sponsored by