The Greek gods and goddesses in light of analytical psychology

To get the most out of Evolver, create your profile now!
7
groks

BLOG NUMBER ONE

G’day and welcome to my blog! Today I’ll be discussing the connection between the Greek gods and modern analytical psychology, and by analytical I refer specifically to theories pioneered by Carl Gustov Jung.

To understand how the ancient Greeks viewed their gods and goddesses, we first need to return to Plato’s conception of the universe. He was a philosopher of the metaphysical school, believing that the cosmos could be divided into an eternal realm of “being” which encompassed the intellect, the divine forms and ideas, as well as an ever-fluctuating, temporal and chaotic world of “becoming”. According to Plato, everything that exists on the material plane or in the world of “becoming” is merely a debased and imperfect copy of its prototype, its first pattern and its ideal which exists in a permanently flawless and suspended state of animation within the eternal world of “being”. The metaphysical school of thought in Greece (i.e. long line of Hellenic mystics and philosophers including Pythagoras, Democritus, Plato, Bolus of Mendes etc. who formulated many of their doctrines after visiting Egypt) recognised these behavioural patterns and psychic imprints as “archetypes”.

The word “archetype” is Greek, coming from the syncretisation of the words "arche", or first, and “typos”, denoting pattern. Thus the ancients were well aware of primordial and universal images which seeped through from the world of being and manifested in the world of matter. Philo Judaeus alluded to the archetype when he spoke of "Imago Dei" (God-image) in man and Irenaeus conformed to this idea by purporting that “The creator of the world did not fashion these things directly from himself, but copied them from archetypes outside himself.”

When psychiatrist Carl Gustov Jung came along in the twentieth century, he took the concept which encompassed the Platonic forms and ideals and applied it to the anatomy of the human psyche. He was certain that the primordial and unconscious blueprints which existed in the world of “being” were all plates which united to form the dynamic, multifaceted and multidimensional sphere of human personality. It’s more than fair to say that the concept of psychological archetypes was developed by Jung.

Plato placed these “archetypes” in the world of “being”; Jung on the other hand localised them to a level of existence that equated to the basement of the mind’s triple-storey warehouse. He called this level the collective unconscious, a kind of memetic bank, a cosmic memory of sorts which encompassed energy fields like feelings, attitudes and discarnate personalities. Having acquired an existence from the time of our coming to consciousness, these energy fields exist within each and every one of us for the entire duration of our lives. You might want to think of the collective unconscious as an intangible and psychic entity that acts quite like cellular DNA, transmitting the accumulating mass of psychic content from generation to generation across vast expanses of time in the manner that physical traits are passed from parents to children.

Among other things, “archetypes” are also part of this psychic river of transmission and coexist within all of us at an unconscious level. They usually surface during periods of unconsciousness, more often than not when we dream or daydream and they appear quite prominently in myths, fairy tales and all ancient religions as fully integrated functioning personalities. There are many, many, many archetypes. Some include love, the Sage, the Devil, the Hero, the Child, the Great Mother, Father Time and the Trickster. Even “The Odyssey”, an idea which encompasses the ultimate life-altering journey (which also appears in myth) made famous by mythographer Joseph Campbell in "The Hero with a Thousand Faces" is as archetype. So are Atlantis and Armageddon. The human soul is also an archetype, manifesting as the opposite sex of the dreamer in his or her sleep. In men it’s called the anima and in women the animus.

The ancient Greeks saw their gods and goddesses in much the same way, but unlike Jung (who believed the forces came from within) they perceived these forces as powers that existed independent of the human psyche. The Greek gods and goddesses belonged to an ethereal realm. They were omniscient, universal and timeless; they could never be touched by the ravages of time or any other limitations of mortality. Yet they interacted with mortals and even manifested through them. A temple maiden who’d suddenly felt the urge to kiss a man might have been described as a slave to Aphrodite. On the other hand, a man wanting to kill his wife for having slept with another man could be described as being overwhelmed by Ares, the god of war. Alternatively, a child overwhelmed by fits of laughter and merriment would have been perceived as having become the mortal vessel of Apollo, albeit fleetingly.

Back then, the cosmos was also perceived to be a an interdimensional hologram of intermingling and interconnecting wholes in which there was a powerful connection between differing conscious and unconscious extensions of nature. Thus, each god or goddess was connected with a specific metal, planet, colour, flower(s), animal(s), number(s) and perfume(s), and any contact, manipulation or acquisition of such would evoke the essence of that particular deity. For example, Aphrodite the goddess of love, was inexplicably linked with the colour green, the number seven, the metal copper, the precious stones of emerald and turquoise, flowering plants like myrtles, birds like doves, sandalwood, and the symbols of the five-pointed star, the apple, the tree, and the serpent (the occult significance and connection of these will be discussed in a later blog).

What can these aspects of nature have in common? Well Aphrodite is love, and love breeds generation; generation and fertility in Mother Nature appear decked in green. Copper, in turn, has a very aesthetic feel to it and turns green when it undergoes oxidisation or verdigris. In addition, copper salts are coloured green or blue and are connected with water, the element in which Aphrodite was born. The dove is her bird because it manifests a more tranquil mode of being, sandalwood her scent because of its erotic and sensual odour. Seven is a number related to various cycles and periods of humanity’s development, as well as the seven obscure points of the body. All these things are connected to her realm; the realm of matter and generation.

You might say that these material representatives served as talismans to evoke the essence of the deity. This idea of cosmic sympathies, analogies or homologies between different elements in the physical world pervaded most philosophical beliefs of late antiquity and forms a central tenet in Hermetic Art and magical correspondences. Unhappily so, occult ideas about the cosmos ring true to select individuals able to think with an open mind and have been rejected, time and time again, sidelined and forgotten by an orthodox science which has become increasingly dogmatic in its ways, particularly after the Middle Age marriage of Aristotelian Scholasticism to Christian doctrine.

In any case, the fields of energy represented by the pantheon of Greek gods cannot be contained. If they are we become ill or unwell. This is why people who freely express themselves or allow themselves to be freely possessed by select archetypes working through them at any particular moment or time end up living far happier, healthier and longer lives than those who consciously or unconsciously repress them. Psychic contents which are kept from seeing the light of consciousness because of prevailing social or moral limitations of the times will slowly but surely tear the human psyche apart, sometimes culminating with the onset of schizophrenia or split personality. Extreme cases include poltergeist activity caused by the unconscious will of sexually repressed teenagers. Let’s not forget the explosion of visions and folktales relating to nymphs, mermaids and other vampiric entities in Europe when emerged as an unconscious reaction to Christian dogma when the church fathers attempted to subdue sexuality, the side of human nature that was henceforth perceived to be sinful and shameful.

The ancient Greeks well and truly understood the consequences of such, which is why they prescribed sleeping in the encoemeterions of healing centres like Epidaurus and Amphiareion in Attica to those riddled by ailments. They were merely attempting to facilitate the expression of these energy fields in hope that the god or “archetype” would appear in the dreams of the ill-fated and bequeath a cure. Believe it or not this practice continues in Greece to this very day, particularly at the Church of Panagia Tinou on Tinos Island where innumerable people suffering from life-threatening or terminal illnesses come on the 15th August to seek a miracle cure in "ekoimisis".

I will conclude this post with a poem I have written, an ode to the goddess Aphrodite.

As the morning star she rises
to the sky like an urgent kite
dressed in the lapis lazuli
of Milonian Aphrodite.

With Aurora’s blessing magical arrows
are shot from a winged car,
embedding themselves in the hearts of men,
level-headed or bizarre.

The outcome of her favourite pastimes
became gossip of historical lore,
unrelenting persuasions of surrender to love
internal battles for both virgin and whore.

At noon, trails of light blind
the wits of the wise.
Trapped willingly or by force
the laughter-lover takes no compromise.

Her conspirators –myrtle, dove and swan –
help rule over sea and skies,
then draw the claws of spite upon those
who’ve told too many lies.

Having woken lusts and passions
that shook many a foundation to the core,
At dusk they implore you, golden, fairest,
liberation from Love’s disease and war.

Paul Kiritsis

Comments

One

Hi Paul, thanks for this. I wondered what you would feel about monotheism in terms of archtypes and the collective unconscious? What does the One as opposed to the Many signify for the individual psyche? As you say, there are dangers in suppressing the necessary impulses of the archetypes. But likewise we can be overrun by them. Where do you find the integrating principle in actual experience rather than in theory?

Monotheism vs. Polytheism

Greetings Landar!

Yes you pose some very good questions.

I think it all comes down to how you view divinity Landar. To me, pantheism makes sense in that the microcosm (human psyche) and the macrocosm (cosmos) both spring from the same source.

Lets equate divinity to light, its physical "equivalent" if you like. If light is human consciousness, then the differing wavelengths of which light is composed, the colours of the rainbow, are the archetypes. My personal belief is that monotheism tends to localise the divine to a syncresis of the archetypes or their crystallisation under a single presiding force, the Intellect (i.e the "Word" or "Logos" of the True God, Jesus Christ in Christian tradition, or gold in alchemical esotericism or the Aten of Pharaoh Akhenaten or Yahweh of the Jews.) Thus in monotheism, we have the Intellect as the presiding force of the psyche, having gained the ascendency over Love, War, Jealousy, etc through a constant yes/no struggle which eventually purges the soul of carnal qualities which may overwhelm it. Its a unity of human consciousness under the throne of one particular archetype, the Intellect.

Remember that our consciousness is multifaceted with many tiers, thus our perceptions will always vascillate between seeing the information universe as an coloured agglomeration of disjointed and discontinuous forms (seeing each aspect of nature as individual daemons, each with a certain "increment" of consciousness on the ladder that leads to pure Intellect) and seeing the inherent unity and likeness between the forms themselves (the origin of everything in pure Intellect) Seeing that macrocosm (cosmos) and microcosm (psyche) are inextricably linked, that would be a kind of vascillation between monotheism and polytheism. How you view it depends entirely on your personal biases, your development and the environment in which you were raised.

This particular framework or conception of the psyche's anatomy and its psychospiritual development is acknowledged and applied by the transpersonal approach to psychotherapies and counselling. Transpersonal psychology owes its methods to development of the ego as descried by Abraham Maslow and Carl Jung, respectively. It applies the proposed model we've discussed to clinical therapies for mental health disorders and existential crises. A friend of mine involved in clinical psychology has used this method to treat drug and alcohol addiction with much success (according to her).

Naturally, the discipline is not without its criticism (as is every experiential model founded upon a certain theory) but on the whole it makes sense. I ran into a good book about it sometime ago called "The Transpersonal: Spirituality in Psychotherapy and Counselling" by John Rowan which I highly recommend.

Paul

--
Dr. Paul Kiritsis, D. Phil.
BBSc, BMSc, PostGradDip, MMSc, D. Phil
Professional writer/ Award-winning author

Identity

Thanks - very thorough. Being of an argumentative nature though (must be the Mars in me).. I note you end your article with name, title and qualifications. This suggests that in fact 'identity' is the presiding factor over the various ideas/beings which manifest in the archetypes. Do we marginalize identity by calling it Intellect? I can't help thinking that the discerning consciousness is more than the sum of perceptions and the 'agglomeration' of forms.

Identity

For sure Landar. We all seek out an identity, and what enables you to do so is the faculty of intellect (because intellect enables one to make a distinction between within and without, inner or outer, something that is a part of "you" and something that is outside "you". Naturally, as time passes you ensure experiences that alters your perceptions and thus the way you view the world, a widening of consciousness if you like. It's the personal ego that is trying to reintegrate with the greater Self, to realise the potentiality of form.

In fact, everybody on this earth is on a quest of some sort. Many people don't even know what it is they're actually looking for. Everything conscious seeks to express itself in one way or another.

--
Dr. Paul Kiritsis, D. Phil.
BBSc, BMSc, PostGradDip, MMSc, D. Phil
Professional writer/ Award-winning author

hmmmm

I do not mean to be demeaning, derogatory or make a presentation that appears to be overly critical. My comments are being made to assert several important points that must not be over looked in our day and age regarding psychiatry in general.

To begin with psychiatry is in its infancy. In fact, "still wet behind the ears", so to speak. At the time of Hellenism mankind had thousands of year experience in the study and application of both agriculture and architecture among other human endeavors. Psychiatry has been in existence for a mere 100 years (+ or -) and our expectation of it should be adjusted according. I realize that though this article leans toward the more philosophical and spiritual aspects within psychiatry the fields is largely used to treat those with serious mental illness and those apparently at dis-ease concerning issues arising from the mind. In this endeavor the prevailing approach at the moment seems to be a leaning toward drug therapies and away from psychotherapies. The former apparently more effective then the later or so it seems.

Secondly, the actual functioning of and locations of the subconscious mind are largely unknown by psychiatry at this time. Until the subconscious is more fully understood in concrete terms references to it a sketchy at best. Does it exist? To all intents and purposes , yes, but that's about all that we know about it. The subconscious mind at this time appears to be a "catch-all" for just about anything unexplainable within psychiatry and unfortunately so.

I would suggest you look very closely at alcoholism in the development of Hellenistic archetypes and directly the use of wine as an intoxicant. Dionysus may in fact be a catalyst of many Hellenist archetypes.

I'll provide you with a few reference that my be of interest.

http://www.evolver.net/user/harbinger/blog/some_symbolism_within_addicti...

If these images arise within non Hellenist societies then one might seek the common denominator for them, in this case alcohol. In fact the development of Stoicism might have been mans earliest attempt at alcoholism treatment and other forms of mental illness and are in fact are being utilized by supportive groups to assist those with addiction problems to this day in the form of 12 step programs.

These are the original Twelve Steps as published by Alcoholics Anonymous:

1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol—that our lives had become unmanageable.
2. Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.
3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.
4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
5. Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.
6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.
7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.
8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all.
9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.
10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it.
11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.
12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics, and to practice these principles in all our affairs.

12 steps information provided from this source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12_steps

Psychology and Psychiatry

Greetings Harbinger and welcome to the blog.

Psychiatry falls outside the scope of the article. Psychiatry and psychology are NOT the same thing. The former aims to understand behaviours and mental processes through the accumulation of homologous cases upon which a theory might be based whereas the latter belongs to the inquiry of medicine and pertains to the study and treatment of mental disorders using drugs. It derives from a syncresis of the Greek words "mind" and "medicine". It's imparative that the two should not be confused with one another.

Psychiatry itself involves a localisation of a medical knowledge belonging to an "orthodox" science which has become increasingly secular and dogmatic in the way that it sees the cosmos. And of course, the mere fact that academic psychiatry doesn't understand how neurochemical signals translate into emotions and thoughts, or how a change in the chemistry of neural receptors could actually relate to subjective levels of experience basically makes it a "tenuous" science at best. How does seratonin receptor blockade actually translate into emotion? We don't really know.

Also, brain physiology or anatomy won't reveal anything about the collective unconscious, subjective realities in the manner that frontal lobe activation won't reveal how one might suddenly find oneself amidst an ethereal realm of nymphs, demons and other malevolent beings. The collective unconscious or "subconscious" mind encompasses an existence that falls outside the markers of physical time and space, or of the five senses that limit the human neural system and many thousands of years ago humans acquired a level of neural development and an increment of consciousness that was conducive to perceiving and henceforth acknowledging its existence.

In any case, why should the psychiatry of the twenty first century be any better than the primitive psychology of the Gnostic Christians with their dramatic and supernal mythic rendition of the fragmentation and reintegration of the soul? Why should psychiatry take precedence over any other holistic science when it comes to treating mental illnesses? On what virtues? The mere fact that it keeps delineating new illnesses and curing none of them should tell us something about the validity of its "truth" and the fallability of the scientific model upon which its theories are based. Remember, each successive civilisation sees itself as the echelon of virtue, and its own socio-political, religious and philosophical values as being superior to that of its predecessors. As we know, sometimes there can be nothing that is further from the truth.

Your commentary about Stoicism sits well with me, yet I don't fully grasp how the therapeutic process for alcoholism mapped out by the twelve steps that you posted has anything to do with psychiatry given that the latter is built upon modern medicine. Medicine as a denomination of orthodox science is strictly "atheistic" and precludes spirituality or any religious Godhead in its psychological model of health and wellbeing. These twelve steps are much more at home in a transpersonal setting than in any dogma put forth by academic psychiatry.

Best,
Paul

P.S. I don't believe the Architect of the Cosmos , or the Cosmic Unity is a "He" by the way (Something very common in the ideology of our patriarchal forebears.) If it were anything, the Godhead would be androgynous seeing that it encompasses both the masculine and the feminine, as well as the potential to manifest through both.

--
Dr. Paul Kiritsis, D. Phil.
BBSc, BMSc, PostGradDip, MMSc, D. Phil
Professional writer/ Award-winning author

You are correct

(edit) Again I realize my comments may appear "damning" to the fields of psychology and psychiatry. This is not my intention. My intent is to be objective. In fact I hold both fields in high regard and am appreciative of them. I am not the enemy.

You are correct yet both psychology and psychiatry are concerned with primarily bringing an end to the worlds problems concerning mental illness and all that I have said applies to both equally. Yes, I know the difference. I stand by my points and those points are relevant to the topic.

There are two fundamentals in all step programs. They are personal powerlessness and the development of character essentially the basis of Stoicism. They are stoic philosophies at there very core and practice. Steps 1,4,8 and 10 are purely stoic in nature and in essence are practiced accordingly.

(edit) My point was/is that drug (Alcohol) usage may very well have influenced the formation and definition of all Hellenist God concepts and archetypes.

(edit) I'm going to add additional points.

The average median life expectancy at the time of the Greek empire was 25 years of age. Cognitive brain function and development concern maturation of this age group should not be ignored in the subject at hand. The populous culture of the Hellenist time period was primarily young adults and may have profoundly influences the Hellenist religion, as well as Christianity, Islam and Buddhism.

(edit) The availability and supply of safe uncontaminated, microbe free drinking water at the time of the Hellenist may have been a serious concern. Pain medications were virtually none existent with the exception of Alcohol. Wine may have in fact have appeared to be a Godsend to those of the era perhaps extending the life times of those that ingested it. If these assumptions are correct the entire population of ancient Greek and Roman cultures may have been alcoholic. As the populations of these cultures grew the problem became compounded and increases in magnitude and continued till the modern advent of a potable water supply and pain medications.

In reply to "Harbinger"

I do not mean to in any way diminish your journey to sobriety nor deride you personally in any way, I would however like to clear up a few points that I believe require attention here.
Firstly, in my opinion it is both in poor manners and poor taste to hijack someone else's blog to further ones own agenda. Now I'm not sure if that is what you set out to do or whether upon reading this most interesting and informative of articles, in fact I doubt that was your intention however be it deliberate or not the fact remains that you have taken a few small portions of the greater body of the article and focused upon them to the detriment of understanding the entire article in context and used those portions to make a completely unrelated point in an attempt to further your (not invalid) own views.
I also MUST point out your apparent lack off differentiation between Stoicism and Monotheism. It is perfectly possible to follow a "Fluid" Pantheistic belief system AND recover from addiction at the same time. YES the 12 step program may have worked for you (as it has for hundreds of thousands of others) but it is not the ONLY way to gain sobriety.
Now I have dealt with your apparent predilection with AA, I'd like to also deal with how a post based on a look into the Ancient Greek Culture utilizing contemporary psychological thought was also twisted into a debate on Psychology vs Psychiatry or Psychology vs the 12 Step Program and you even somehow managed to attempt to shift blame for the archetype of the "Drunken Lord of the Forrest" to Hellenistic Culture when in reality if you understood fully the way archetypes work you would know that they are not simply built up by one cultures mythological system, the are deeply ingrained ideas that emerge time and again from the collective subconscious across all cultures and throughout all periods of time.
What you mention regarding the lack of availability of clean drinking water during that period and yes a very low alcoholic beer type drink was brewed and drunk instead to avoid water born viruses spreading, however what you may not know or did not mention is that this practice continued all through antiquity right up to a few hundred years of the founding of England's famous Oxford University where the students, young boys and men were given a low alcoholic beer drink as opposed to water in order to halt the infections that occurred due to there being no suitable nearby water source.
As an Addict Harbinger, you will know that "A drug, is a drug, is a drug" to an Addict, that is because Addiction is an illness and one that the Addict has very little (or according to you and AA: NO) control over. Does AA not also mention that there are people who are able to have just one or two drink and be fine, it doesn't send them on a "bender"? Those people in AA are called Non-Addicts so in hindsight it would be a foolish assumption to say that Hellenistic Culture was responsible for inflicting the blight of alcohol addiction upon humanity as you seem to be suggesting, wouldn't you agree?
MAY I SUGGEST: That from now on we attempt to keep the replies to blog's as close to the subject matter contained therein? I believe that is only fair an courteous to the author.
Many thanks
MrAstroJazz

The intent was to

The intent was to expand the content of the article and present other points relevant too it. You may read it anyway you wish. Whether or not you agree is irrelevant to the content I've provided.

There is no hidden agenda within the points I have presented, expressed nor implied.

However, I was not implying that Hellenism was the source of Alcohol or alcoholism. I'm not sure where your reading that into my comments but again you may read it anyway you wish.

Your assumptions regarding my personal involvement with alcohol are purely conjecture and speculation. Issues I will not address with you.

Hi,

Think about what you've read so far. Does it reinforce what you already know about 70-516 exam? Or was there something completely new? What about the remaining paragraphs? Download latest Microsoft 70-523 exam questions and answers with real simulations that provides you 100% guarantee to pass your final exam. A number of websites can be found which provide very useful Microsoft 70-563 exam tips and enhance your knowledge. The website of Selftestexams.com is especially designed for the prospective candidates of certification exams. There's no doubt that the topic of can be fascinating. If you still have unanswered questions about 70-567 exam, you may find what you're looking for in the next article.

Syndicate content

"Banish the word 'struggle' from your attitude and your vocabulary. All that we do now must be done in a sacred manner and in celebration. We are the ones we have been waiting for." — Hopi elders

Sponsored by