Four Arguments for The Elimination of Television
- Login or register to post comments
- Print this page
If you accept nuclear power plants, you also accept a techno-scientific-industrial-military elite. Without these people in charge, you could not have nuclear power. You and I getting together with a few friends could not make use of nuclear power. We could not build such a plant, nor could we make personal use of its output, nor handle or store the radioactive waste products which remain dangerous to life for thousands of years. The wastes, in turn, determine that future societies will have to maintain a technological capacity to deal with the problem, and the military capability to protect the wastes. So the existence of the technology determines many aspects of the society.
If you accept mass production, you accept that a small number of people will supervise the daily existence of a much larger number of people. You accept that human beings will spend long hours, every day, engaged in repetitive work, while suppressing any desires for experience or activity beyond this work. The workers' behavior becomes subject to the machine. With mass production, you also accept that huge numbers of identical items will need to be efficiently distributed to huge numbers of people and that institutions such as advertising will arise to do this. One technological process cannot exist without the other, creating symbiotic relationships among technologies themselves.
If you accept the existence of advertising, you accept a system designed to persuade and to dominate minds by interfering in people's thinking patterns. You also accept that the system will be used by the sorts of people who like to influence people and are good at it. No person who did not wish to dominate others would choose to use advertising, or choosing it, succeed in it. So the basic nature of advertising and all technologies created to serve it will be consistent with this purpose, will encourage this behavior in society, and will tend to push social evolution in this direction.
In all of these instances, the basic form of the institution and the technology determines its interaction with the world, the way it will be used, the kind of people who use it, and to what ends.
And so it is with television.
Far from being "neutral," television itself predetermines who shall use it, how they will use it, what effects it will have on individual lives, and, if it continues to be widely used, what sorts of political forms will inevitably emerge. These will be the subjects taken up in the main body of this book.
The above is quoted from;
Four Arguments for The Elimination of Television By Jerry Mander
http://www.motherearthnews.com/Nature-Community/1978-09-01/Subliminal-Me...
I still do not plan to replace my television.
May all be well in our world.
Comments
back in...
...my printed 'zine days, there was one around called SET FREE. SET stood for Society For The Elimination Of Television. Hasn't come to fruition yet, I see.
My own TV watching has changed a bunch over the years. I only watch on Sunday nights now. And i'm usually doing the NY Times crossword while viewing.
great book
i read that book many years ago, and have not had cable vision in my house since. i still do watch movies, but at least now i control what i watch in my own house. i believe that we could all benefit a great deal by disconnecting from the cable companies products. less TV equals more free time to be creative to share with loved ones, to get exercise and do things (other than TV) that you love.

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket

