How can you be prolife and eat dead meat?

The prolife argument is a hyprocritical argument. How is it that you can call yourself prolife yet you support the mass slaughter of animals. The way animals that people eat are treated in mass production is equivelant to the holocaust if you ask me, the only difference is that people have the ability to speak up. I’ve never been able to relate to that side of the debate anyway, because I’ve never thought any group of people should be allowed to make everyone elses personal descisions. The modern conservative view would make abortions illegal across the board, so that nobody in any circumstances would have the ability to have one. To me the major decider in the debate is the fact that different people are in different situations with different circumstances & what works for one person may not be the answer for another, but any individual should be able to decide for themselves. The prolife argument would argue that the babies should have rights because they don’t have the ability to speak for themselves, but in that case wouldn’t it be the same for animals and trees being cut down. Thats why in my view these people are not prolife at all, they are simply pro-human or pro-human fetus. What is it that makes us so sacred, when humans are the cause of pain and suffering for nearly all lower creatures I find it kinda hard to be sympathetic to the anti-abortion argument. Nearly all prolife people eat meat, and lots of them support the death penalty. So their saying that its ok to kill millions of defensless animals & plants, and to destroy the oceans, but its not okay to prevent a baby from being born (into a bad situation at that). Maybe if I actually met a prolife person that was pro-all life I could take them more seriously, but the fact is that their views are simply driven by religion & us sane folks decided a long time ago that we don’t want religion controlling our lives.