Let It Die: article on how the economic crisis came to be

To get the most out of Evolver, create your profile now!
3
groks

Douglas Rushkoff on letting the corporate and bank based economy die: http://www.arthurmag.com/2009/03/16/let-it-die-rushkoff-on-the-economy/
The article features the history of the corporation and how local currencies were historically squeezed out. Here are a few highlights:

- The fact that the speculative economy for cash and commodities accounts for over 95% of economic transactions, while people actually using money and consuming commodities constitute less than 5% tells us something important. Real supply and demand have almost nothing to do with prices. We do not live in an economy, we live in a Ponzi scheme.

- Local currencies, which helped regions reinvest in their own activities, and centralized currencies, for long distance transactions. Local currencies were earned into existence. A farmer would grow a bunch of grain, bring it to the grain store, and get receipts for how much grain he had deposited. The receipts could be used as money—even by people who didn’t need grain at that particular moment. Everyone knew what it was worth.

- The interesting thing about local, grain-based currencies was that they lost value over time. The people at the grain store had to be paid, and a certain amount of grain was lost to rain or rodents. So every year, the money would be worth less. This encouraged people to spend it rather than save it. And they did. Late Middle Ages workers were paid more for less work time than at any point in history. Women were taller in England in that era than they are today—an indication of their relative health. People did preventative maintenance on their equipment, and invested in innovation. There was so much extra money looking for productive investment, that people built cathedrals. The great cathedrals of Europe were not paid for with money from the Vatican; they were local investments, made by small towns looking for ways to share their prosperity with future generations by creating tourist attractions.

- Using future tax dollars to give banks more money to lend out at interest is robbing from the poor to pay the rich to rob from the poor.

- In short, the less we are able to depend on business-as-usual to provide for our basic needs, the more we will be forced to provide them for ourselves and one another. Sometimes we’ll do this for free, because we like each other, or live in the same community. Sometimes we’ll exchange services or favors. Sometimes we’ll use one of the alternative, local currencies coming into use across the country as Central bank-issued currencies become too hard to get without a corporate job.

Comments

gosh!!!

Hi shiva... great article... haven't finish it but so far I just keep nodding... I've seen documentaries, read articles, etc... and they all seem to concur...
But when it comes to talking to people like my coworkers and such that have a 401k etc, etc... they turn the other way... complete denial... ugh!!!
I live in Texas so you can imagine the climate here... it's a fucking dogmatic belief towards the "free market"... shit,,, free for who? the worst is that emerging economies want to copy the US economy... big mistake...

SeRgIo

Syndicate content

"Banish the word 'struggle' from your attitude and your vocabulary. All that we do now must be done in a sacred manner and in celebration. We are the ones we have been waiting for." — Hopi elders

Sponsored by