College: The Societal Ritalin of our Time

To get the most out of Evolver, create your profile now!
30
groks

Do you want to know what happens to those who think outside of the box?

The truth? Universities crush them.

College, the supposed beacon of intellectual prowess, is no more than a sophisticated, fancy little game that we are all innocuously playing. It torts idealism, breaks the will of ingenuity, and molds its participants into pawns of society.

In saying this, I am in no way declaring a college education itself as ludicrous. Without my nearly four years of higher-level schooling, I would not have developed the mental skills needed in order to write this column, amongst other things. Nonetheless, when the victim realizes the oppressor is at fault, it is time to speak up. Intellectual diversity is at stake.

Our traditional system of higher-level education greatly parallels Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Actually, college is more like the societal Ritalin for ADHD.

Students come to college with a diverse array of learning styles, thought processing methods, and aspirations for life. Upon getting to college, they are forced into a very specific mold: standardized testing, standardized methods of intellectual communication and expression, and—worst of all—the standardized processing, and thus elimination, of dreams which are not deemed “societally applicable.”

So the students who idealize, question the sanity of societal systems, or simply like to learn in ways other than hunching over a desk for eight hours a day are deemed “societally hyperactive.” Four years of college will certainly fix this “illness,” hence the parallel to Ritalin, the medicine that has been proven to sometimes cause stunted growth, drowsiness, and appetite loss.

Analogously, college leads to stunted dreams, lots of tiredness, and a decreased appetite for doing anything the intellectual elite deem unacceptable.

I should note that a lot of students have already lost this sense pure and diverse open-mindedness to the twelve years of education they’ve had before they even came to college. Even so, college, which is often viewed as more fulfilling than our abysmal lower levels of education, continues this intellectual imperialism.

But really, do you think learning in dreary, emotionless classrooms for hours on end is conducive to expanding your horizons? Hell, I’ve been to funeral homes that are more enjoyable. This is unnatural.

Does anyone else feel twelve page research papers are not the most effective way in harnessing knowledge? I bet I have allies.

More broadly, do any students see the glaring flaws in any aspect of our culture, only to be told by the elite that their ideas just won’t work?

On countless occasions university mentors have suppressed my ideals. Their lethargic reactions have been detrimental in the process of putting these ideals into action.

In other words, questioning the very makeup of our society has not gotten a serious reaction from professors and staff. Radical thought is dead.

College is, ironically, the “go to jail” of intellectual Monopoly. Except, instead of getting free from jail in three rolls, it usually takes four years of rolling, and the tuition—debt that often prevents students from quitting—is a lot more than fifty dollars. And just like Monopoly, we are trapped into playing by the insipidly bland rules of the game, and—worse yet—must dutifully compete rather than cooperate.

Sure I learn stuff here, but I refuse to let my idealism be lost in an atmosphere of insensible submissiveness.

Today, I write to all of the many allegorical and societal ADHD sufferers: Consider overcoming the Ritalin, and the mindset it instills. There is a world—a beautiful and real world—that lurks beyond the ivory tower. Rediscover the beauty of your childlike idealism, live it, and never back down.

You don’t need to buy into the conformist system of intellectual Monopoly. Do not pass “Go”? Do not collect 200 college credits? You are not intellectually bankrupt. Don’t ever let any game tell you so.

- Teddy

Comments

wow

excellent

I originally wanted to

I originally wanted to become a philosopher; however, having taken an honors seminar within my university's philosophy department on "What is Life?" I soon realized after being repeatedly shot down after every one of my conjectures that college was not going to be the experience they system had built it up to be.

so thank you.

thanks

for being positive

Thanks for the comments,

Thanks for the comments, guys and girls, I appreciate it.

And Monte, I agree with you that college does have its benefits. As you said, the critical thinking skills that are developed are very beneficial. That is why I said in the column that a college education itself is not ludicrous.

What I am saying is that when I actually question the big picture, of our culture, its destructiveness, and the likes, I am never taken seriously. Professors like going by the books, and always support the idea of green technology and anthropocentrism, but seldom facilitate discussion on whether or not green technology will do us any better or simply enhance the destruction of the planet. Or sometimes they will smirk at me and tell me of the time when they used to be idealists like I am a child or something who will grow out of this mindset. But really, they all have the expectation that our industrial civilization is a set expectation, when I would like to think of it as an option. Can you sense my frustration?

If I grow out of this mindset, I wholeheartedly feel I will have failed myself.

Again, thanks for bringing that up, though. WIthout my education I would not be questioning civilization in the first place. But now I do, thus must ask these tough questions.

Thanks!

- Teddy

Man....

I'm 44 and I think I'm growing deeper into it....

See there are things in life you grow into and they probably would not want that to be argued because the book tells them that we grow out of and not into.

See I didn't have to go to college to figure that one out... It just came to me!

Just after responding I saw

Just after responding I saw this link on the Evolver main page:

http://www.evolver.net/news/2010/03/23/john_taylor_gatto_consequences_pu...

Gatto essentially communicates the same frustrations that I have with all levels of our traditional schooling. We are processed into being obedient subjects rather than creative, ideal beings.

Yeah, Gatto did some

Yeah, Gatto did some excellent research. His 'Underground History of American Education' is seminal.

The way out if pretty obvious: restructure (from the ground up) such that from the very beginning, children are encouraged to seek out knowledge because it is fun. Given an education like that you wouldn't need a constitution. Democracy would be innate.

The Revolution is Within

Classes

Yeah, I am in an science-related environmental field of study, and even so, my peers' enthusiasm for non status quo material is usually mediocre, to say the least. But it certainly can be used towards my benefit, so I am doing what I can with the little time I have left here.

Thanks for the input!

Echoes my own sentiments...

After reading both the original post and the comments, I would have to say that I agree with both Teddy Grahams as well as Monte.

I was actually in the process of writing a little piece expressing my personal frustration with the way that academic philosophy is done. I completely understand the value in having boundaries defined for you in order to develop the discipline that is necessary to learn a very specific skill, such as engineering, physics, computer programing, etc... However, in the humanities departments, i have a serious bone to pick with the lack of freedom. In philosophy, one never spends time creating philosophy, only consuming it. No one is ever encouraged to go out on a limb; no is ever encouraged to forge their own path. And this, is very, very, disappointing. The idealists who enter philosophy because of their sheer love of wisdom are reduced to historians of philosophy who are looking for pragmatic ways of 'fitting into the status quo.'

A damn shame.

So basically, I've come to the same conclusion as you Teddy, except my own piece was directed more specifically towards philosophy rather than the college experience at large.

College Doesn't Have to Be Like That

I second what Monte said about "maybe you just went to the wrong college."

I went to Harvey Mudd College, and my college was awesome.

Everything was creative and busting with life. People were making amazing things everywhere, and we would discuss 7 impossible ideas at every breakfast. It was a place of incredible discoveries and transformation, on a regular basis.

Our professors were not "stiflers" at all -- they challenged, even demanded of us that we give our best in life, even if it wasn't through the established traditional paths. And my college recruited from outside the established traditional paths, as well.

I find it interesting that Monte advocated engineering, botany, environmental science, computer programming, and chemistry -- my school was an engineering school. Our six (and only six!) majors were: Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Mathematics, Computer Science, and Engineering -- always with a strong emphasis on humanities and social sciences.

Teddy's questions were just the sort of questions that we were encouraged with, when I was at Mudd. One of my first hum (humanities) classes was on technology and the utopian impulse; These were just the sorts of questions we talked about and brought into the work we did.

What Monte said is now making me rethink my thoughts about addressing social creatives, about Evolver types. Hard sciences and materials technology may be just what the doctor ordered. With a materials education, you can be very creative, and also see manufacturing from ground zero. With the hard sciences, you can hone your intuition with the "does it work" of the natural world in a powerful way.

I now have a deeper understanding of how to make the case for the hard sciences not as a means toward material gain, but rather, motivated by the spiritual impulses towards integrity, truth, creativity, protection, and adventure.

Fascinating and innovative

Fascinating and innovative institution you went to, LionKimbo. Sounds like it would have been right up my alley (an English major who went into physics, went on to teach English in Japan while learning Japanese, and now studies astrophysics and astrology (on the sly) simultaneously at an old and prestigious institution, while practicing yoga, writing poetry and plotting conscious revolution.) That all sounds so much more impressive than it actually is and well ... that's university for you! Also there's more of us than you may think ... for exhibit A I point to a colleague of mine who has a theology degree in gnostic Christianity, plays every sport you know and is getting his master's working on photonics or something.

It's good to see schools out there catering to that sort of thing. People should be developed in as many directions as possible ... that used to be the point! We aren't insects; specialization is inhuman.

The Revolution is Within

fair

This is a fair argument, and I find my self continuously running into roadblocks to my intellectual freedom, creativity, whatever you want to call it.
I find myself frustrated by the lack of openness of teachers to students, but at the same time, have some more faith in my education than I think Teddy does.

The problem for me is, yes institutional education is messed up, just like yes, industrial society is messed up. The question is what are you contributing to move around that. If you are just another griper saying fuck the man, we have plenty of those already, and there have always been those people. Im not saying you're invalid, in actuality I share these sentiments.
If education is so messed up, what is better? What is within reach? What actual forseeable changes can we incur, as frustrated students and citizens?
What alternative to current indoctrinating university (and society at large) could be feasible?

also, yes an education is frustrating, indoctrinating, and conforming, but at the end we receive a very special piece of paper. It may not mean anything actually, it may even mean you think in a more constricted manner, but what it DOES mean is that other indoctrinated people recognize us, we fly the banner signifying our coming-of-age into the conformist society.
Who cares? If society is so evil and rigid, who wants to be a part of it?
Well, with that special piece of paper, we can get inside the walls of Babylon and tear them apart from the inside, so to speak. There is danger in this, however. We may be indoctrinated against our will, surreptitiously brainwashed by general society. Its not like certain people are 'out to get us', but society as a whole will certainly pull us towards the middle.
There is the danger that, in settling into a job and the rat race lifestyle, we eye porsches and beachside homes in Malibu, and accept the American dream as our own. This, indeed, is what happens to most.
So, what is the answer? Never stop being fed up? Unlike those professors, never forget that previous time when you wanted to challenge the establishment. Never stop being frustrated. Never 'settle'.
If you're not pissed off at current society, current education, current everything, you aren't trying hard enough.
The real challenge then, is to harness that frustration, surf that wave, and slip undetected into the walls of privileged society, and then, finally, when everyone least suspects it, throw a wrench in the whole system.
The most effective revolutionaries are the ones who strike from within.

Exodus 2012

Hey, I'm all for creating new cultures.

But it's also important to love the mother culture. Honor thy mother and father.

I have high confidence that -- if you hold on as you say you want to -- that you will create or find an environment of transformation.

But love your mother and father. Love the culture that birthed you, even as you outgrow it and create a new one.

Teddy, are you done with

Teddy, are you done with college at this point? I'm just curious what the incidence that prompted this blog was.

I appreciated this comment from Sophia -- "The idealists who enter philosophy because of their sheer love of wisdom are reduced to historians of philosophy" -- I agree and disagree with that sentiment. Can't argue that philosophy majors are just worked to death on memorizing the history of big thinking -- but at the same time, if they *do* attain an accurate grasp on what the big thinkers were getting at, people *DO* seek the wisdom of the philosophy major. I know I have.

I was talking with this friend, the philosophy major, yesterday. We have our usual discussions about education because she's going into the field, which intrigues me because every generation is expected to make up for several preceding generations that slacked, or missed the mark. It's the "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" idea.

As a student learning to be a teacher, you are expected to jump through an ungodly amount of hoops, and even then it's up in the air whether or not you make it "in." Also at the moment in our school district, we have some appointed administration people who are *clearly* taking the money and running. Something like 200 teachers were just laid off -- something we CLEARLY cannot afford if you know anything about my city. Now everything's being arranged by seniority -- teachers who were only a year shy of their tenure have been let go indefinitely. This has pissed people off all the way up the ladder -- all the way to the principals. Right now we're all still waiting for the shit to hit the fan -- but alas, the administrator in question is still being investigated by the FBI in at least two other school districts. So who knows.

Now this is what boggles my mind, that our public school systems have financial cracks that allow administration to suck the funds dry. THAT sort of thing makes me lose faith in schools, much moreso than where teachers fail. This is the sort of thing that keeps people from wanting to BE teachers -- which continues impairing the cycle with the bootstraps.

Schools, and how much they are like prisons, whether it be for the student or the teacher, is what really pisses me off. THAT is where the system needs an overhaul.

Good teachers are good people. They respect the student who has the gourd to ask questions -- they don't feel the urge to bash a concept into the student for just not getting it. They understand that questions can lead to discussions that can cover more ground than a lecture. They understand that every student is different, learns differently, has different potential and different aspirations. They realize where the line is between the student and the teacher -- and that line is not to be crossed -- and there's an unsaid line of respect there too. Good teachers are eternal learners.

That being said, they are towing the intellectual line. Because of the bootstraps idea, it's slow-going. It just is, even if you're a great teacher. You're making up for past generations. Obviously, there are tons of teachers who are just there for a steady job, and whether students pass or fail is not of their concern. But those teachers are obvious by nature. They are the ones that have no reception to new ideas and approaches, they simply want to hear their point of view regurgitated. They give themselves away by how they treat the student.

So not only are the good teachers making up for previous generations, but for wherever their colleagues mess up.

I am also concerned about my friends who are full-time students, and constantly frazzled and sleep-deprived. I myself go part-time because I work nights and I actually want to reach old age. Yes, I think part of over-working the student is rushing the student to the grave. It is consumption, it is de-elevating the student to the consumer level. THAT is the point, and I think that's what you're getting at when you're talking about how constrained life is for the student.

However, there *are* teachers who give power back to their students. And there *are* students who never allow the system to strip them entirely of their internal freedoms. Maybe that's what we need -- training in that aspect, as students trying to hold onto our internal freedoms, while still making our way through the system. Because really, what choice do we have?

Teddy, I really liked this blog, and it's good to know that other people here are so concerned with education, because it certainly needs our help and attention, whether it be our public schools or our colleges and universities. I just wanted to stick up for the teachers because the good ones have a rough go of it =)

You might enjoy this
http://howtheuniversityworks.com

Take care

Great points

Hello, all, and thank you for continuing this discussion.

I was trying to think of a way to describe my education and the flaws that the institution has in the best manner. I came up with one example.

I am studying meteorology, weather, climate, and environmental implications. Now, this past summer I took the random opportunity of living and working on an organic farm for a month far away from any town. The head farmers himself was actually a high school dropout. Even so, he knew his land and the interactions of different systems around his land. A weather system was moving through, and simply by looking at the clouds he could tell me dead on that in 20 minutes the rain would come. He was right. This was eye opening in that, in this scenario, my intellectual, technology-intensive skills that I was perfecting back at the university were about as useful as a boat in a desert. Four years of studying this stuff and this man knew more about his locality than the meteorologist did.

What else did this prove to me? Well, I firmly believe we need to localize, not just our livelihoods but our education system as well. I could have all of the large-scale, theoretical knowledge in the world, but if I do not know the beautiful subtleties of the land, I am in essence of little use to anyone, aside of looking in the mirror and boosting my self esteem. This is one of the fundamental problems with education today. It is a cookie-cutter, plug and chug, get through the system sort of mentality that all-too-frequently ignores the fine details of life.

Knowing what I know now, I would change majors, transfer, drop out, or something. But I am in my last semester here, so it's too late and I'll make the best of it. I am sure other universities tackle some of these issues better than mine. Even so, there are fundamental problems with the traditional system in general. I will try and come up with a list of things I think could be improved to share with you all and see what you think.

Also, I am grateful for my education, and have faith it has deepened my understanding of life in general, but I am also critical of the gaping flaws of the environment in which I take part in.

Thanks again!

To note, several things

To note, several things motivated me to write this column. To start, I was having a conversation with a friend about questioning civilization in it entirety. He was taken aback because I was the first person at school he came across who actually questioned the practicalities of college, the large-scale flaws within, and the likes. Similarly, I was talking with one of my friends about ADHD (she was diagnosed as a child, and if I had ever gone to psychiatrist I would have been too), and my allegorical mindset got churning--I put two and two together and wrote the column.

Many discussions and attempted discussions with professors also played a large part. Some seem to tolerate my ideas, but have already come to their own conclusions, really. And to be honest, I should expect that. To receive five to ten years of upper-level schooling to become a professor probably means one would have to have faith in the system in which it is applied. Furthermore, my school's mission statement includes, "prepares students to lead and serve in society." If our society is already an expectation, my mindset is probably not going to be nurtured to the best of its ability.

This column will also appear in my school's newspaper this Friday, so I am hoping it will spark discussion on campus.

And also, to LionKimbor: I

And also, to LionKimbor: I definitely understand the idea of honoring the mother and father culture. I see little purpose in abandoning it completely. Doing so accomplishes nothing. I am who I am because of the mainstream culture whether I like it or not, and must nurture the localities of this culture. But it is also important to understand when systems have serious issues. Just as a victim of sexual abuse would view his or her abuser critically, I have to do so of my culture. There is still a respect, but a deep understanding that it is extremely ill in so many ways.

"Don't let the bastards get you down"

Teddy - Fifty years ago pre college - I was suffering from acute confusion. The only possible major for me to take in college was philosophy. So when I came to Columbia that is exactly what I wound up doing.

Through a circuitous route I eventually got a Masters in psychology, then a Ph.D. in voacational rehabilitation counseling. My degree aided me in taking advantage of an opportunity to be a founder of the orginal Odyssey House - an innovative therapeutic commnunity center treating heroin addicts.

For the 17 months I worked there I experienced the very best and the very worst of working with substance abusers. Although I was never addicted to drugs I did discover that all that seemed to separate the resident and myself was the fact that I got to go home at night whereas they had to stay in the center.

I discovered I had a knack for conducting therapy but learned to distrust most authorities - for good reason.

Eventually I went on to more training as a psychotherapist working in a clinic seeing hoards of patients for $6.00 per session - all in the service of learning a trade.

Eventually I went into private practice and more evntually I got licensed as a psychoanalyst. Aiding me in being both an effective and gratified person and and professional are the incalcuable riches derived from my continued immersion in philosophy.

Two quotes come to mind which you might find useful in walking your own trip through life: "The longest way around is the shortest way home" (Ullysses - Joyce) and "Never let going to college interfere with getting a good education." Source known -

Navigation

Thanks, Gibbs. I certainly get frustrated at times, but it is nice to hear of the individuals who have navigated through the smoke and mirrors without succumbing to the many errs we can so easily fall to.

It is also funny, how each time I grow out of a stage in life, and see beyond some kind of illusion or another, I quickly land on my feet and find a new route to take. It is nice.

Suggestions

* Personalized experience - Universities are often too large to allow for individual fostering of one's learning endeavor. If professors were able to take on more of a mentor role rather than teach classes of one hundred people, this would benefit the student tremendously.

* Increased interdepartmental communication - It seems very unnatural to fragment every subject matter into its own entity. Doing so makes communication between various issues--issues that are wholeheartedly connected at the hip--harder to examine in their entirety. Economics and natural science and philosophy professors need to have a better understanding of each other and the content covered in classes in order to connect the dots better.

* More Experiential learning - Theoretics can only go so far, and it is rather unnatural as well. Hands on, applied learning works best. Try to teach someone in a classroom what love means with theoretical equations and powerpoints, and the student will think he or she has a decent understanding of it. But if the student truly experiences love firsthand, feeling the warmth of another human being's flesh, then the understanding is exemplified tenfold.

* Decreased emphasis on GPA - If there were no traditional grading scale many students would probably lack the motivation to do various assignments. This is good, though, because if they do not have the natural motivation, they should not be learning the material in the first place. Institutions of higher learning should be for people who have natural passion.

I guess I could go on, but I think this is a good starting point, for now...

LISTEN

EVERYONE NEEDS TO COME TOGETHER

yessssssss lets be positive NOOWWWWWWWW

I'm not sure what university you go to, or went to, or what your experience is with them.

I am the president of a student organization called Introspective Truth at Indiana University. I have been working with a committee within the Union Board called Debates and Issues. The Union Board programs all of the events on campus.

Just five minutes ago Brian, the director of the Debates and Issues committee and I proposed the event to the Union Board. The Board is made up mostly of students. The students run the students! There is no man holding us down! We must COME TOGETHER we are each other, feel for each other.

THE EVENT PASSED 12 VOTES AGAINST 4!!!

I love you Indiana University! I love college! and I love you

The event is April 10th, Jonathan Phillips is coming as well as Dr. Carol Rosin (look her up on youtube shes legittt)

Source known

"Never let going to college interfere with getting a good education." Source known -
I believe that is actually Albert Einstein's quote (or similar to remark he made).
Another one of his goes something like: "I did not come to my understanding of the universe through my rational mind."

Not sure if you're familiar with Ram Dass (aka Richard Alpert)? Alpert was a leading behavioral psychologist who received his PhD from Stanford then found himself as a faculty member in the psychology dept. at Harvard in the mid 1960's, along side of Timothy Leary. Long story short, they ingested massive quantities of psychedelics and found that the current 'models' of consciousness that were taught at the finest universities actually were/are highly inadequate in defining what consciousness really was/is. They were ultimately 'relieved' (fired) of their faculty positions. Alpert's story gets considerably more interesting following his departure from Harvard. I would encourage you to check out some of his writing and/or lectures. My favorite book of his is 'Grist for the Mill' by Ram Dass. He is one of the smartest, funniest, and incredibly spiritual beings I've ever met. His story really defines the limits of an establishment education, but it (his education) nevertheless prepared and made him highly skilled in communicating complex ideas.

Academic science is predominantly composed of dogmatic materialists, with little understanding of subtler universal forces at work in nature.

Eckhart Tolle has a similar story with academics, though he wasn't into psychedelics, he had a very profound awakening while a professor at Cambridge. Check out 'A New Earth'

Another great book you might want to check out is The Island by Aldous Huxley. I think you'd get a lot of it.

Fear is the Mindkiller

Ashley - if you were naturally the best philosopher (if there is such a thing) in the room without a great deal of training, you would be the exception to the hundreds of great thinkers that have existed in the past 5000 years. Don't let initial failures of logic and reasoning cloud what you could become. Don't let fear of failure stop you.

SophiaDelic - Those who allow themselves to be made the historians of philosophy when their hearts lie in creating it cannot call themselves philosophers rather, they are specialized librarians. I realize the need for those whom are philosophers to have a fairly detailed knowledge of the thoughts that came before them, but only as a tool to formulate their own ideals. Just because the established system has no tolerance for new idea doesn't mean you shouldn't give them new ideas; No! You must now. A system of knowledge (The STUDY of knowledge) that has grown weary of more knowledge is obviously very broken. Fearing not being accepted shouldn't ever enter your mind.

LionKimbro and Joanne - There are always those people for whom academia is the best fit and if you are one and you found a college in which satisfies more than mere intellectual gain, then you are a lucky person. Mass education is never a perfect system nor even a good one. There has to be a understanding to the establishment people are not suited for more than exactly what they are suited for. Having a society that implies that EVERYONE should, rather, NEEDS to go to college to live a full and happy life is simply wrong. It works for the system beautifully, churning out more and more people stuffed into little intellectual boxes and skills to keep the rest of society at the status quo. Happiness never really plays a factor. However should you be one of those rare few in which your choice in academia makes you a happier person, makes your life full in the pursuit of that knowledge, I have no reason to impede you. However if you are in college because all your life you have been told you CANNOT live happily without a college education, I would say to you that you are a victim of the fear society requires of its' inhabitants.

Andres - Your post is the most seen post in all discussions in this vein. People have been using the argument that we must break down the walls from within, be the change you want to see in the world, work harder at fixing the status quo. What I see in this argument is probably the most elegant aspect of a given society, in that even when people see what is so very wrong with it and set out to fix it - they are in fact only prolonging the problem. The mentality that society is somewhat messed up but not so bad that if we put our noses to the grindstone long enough so that when it is our time to shine we can make that critical, magical, fix that changes the whole damn thing...is a sad illusion. Also, anyone who believes that the most effective revolutionaries are whose who strike within the system completely missed the day in school when they talked about Socrates, Galileo, Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr. etc....

All in all, education isn't the problem, society is a problem but not the real problem. Joanne said in her post "Because really, what choice do we have?" in regards to making it through the system. You always have a choice. Society may have implied there is metaphorical gun pointed at the head of your happiness but that is a flat out lie. Knowledge isn't something that can be beaten into a person nor is it something that, should you not have the aptitude to understand, be understood. Pre-College education in the US is a joke. 61% is passing? From experience I know that grade is achievable merely by being awake (sometimes) in class and making educated guesses on the multiple choice tests.

To be fair, I believe everyone should be given the opportunity to learn, to see where their limits are, and to CHOOSE the life they want after that. Society sees the uneducated as the intellectually poor whose role is that of pure service to keep the society lubricated. Society sees the educated as the intellectually rich whose role is that of pure service to keep society lubricated. Whether or not you are educated you are still placed in the same service role to society. Why do we do this? Why do we go through none, 2, 4 or maybe 8 years of school merely to keep the status quo of society? No matter how clever or imaginative you can be with your hard science or education degree - you are only keeping the status quo - for a while longer.

We do this because the society, naturally, offers no other view. It isn't that society is evil rather society is a closed structure that feeds itself and we know that because it keeps working for decades with virtually no change. No, the real problem that exists in every society is that virtually every society has innate fear hardwired into its' inhabitants. You don't follow these procedures, this moral code, that style of writing, this dress code, these languages...you will be punished by society. Either you have the impression you will be so unhappy that it is hardly worth living; you will have no material wealth (therefore be worth nothing); your ideas might be ridiculed by your peers (the establishment); your'e obviously intellectually poor for not pursuing a higher 'education'; and most importantly, you know subconsciously that if you don't play by societies very narrow rules, it will fail and it will be your fault. Fear keeps you and I from straying to far from the coloring lines of society.

But really, what choice do we have?

SunTzuWarrior

I respect and defend teachers who treat learning as a sacred thing. Apparently some of you guys got the short end of the stick in that regard, which sucks. No, not all are like that, in fact that is the rare breed, but it's ideal. Deep down, we want teachers we can trust. The problem is they're boxed into a more complicated set of problems than we are -- they're forced to restrain themselves even more than the students -- and they're totally underpaid when they do a great job.

When I got my night job at UPS in 2005, and I couldn't balance full-time school every morning with working til 3am, I kept my job because I knew it was stable. I quit school, and I gave myself two years to just work and not bother with college. So I have more perspective on the topic than you might think.

You're right, there are other choices... but how many? And what are the quality of those choices?

What I learned in that time is that how the worker is treated is far, far worse in comparison to the student.

Not to downplay how badly the student is treated, by any means. But if we're gonna get all fired up about how the college student is treated by society, then why not the worker? Without college, aren't you just a worker? Isn't that the choice we're left with?

I just think it's really easy to point fingers and tell everyone they have other options without actually suggesting anything.

From my experiences, if I had to choose between the way I'm treated at my job and the way I'm treated in college... it's not a choice. College treats me better.

Here's the problem we're all neglecting. We agree. As workers, as students... as *citizens* we agree to a certain amount of abuse. We expect the line to be pushed. We lower our standards, and up our tolerance of what we're willing to take. This is how the abuse perpetuates -- first it's allowed, then it's allowed, then it's allowed.

College cannot completely strip me of my freedoms or identity. Nor can my job. Nor can my government.

Is that part of the intent? Yes. But we don't need to empower it. It can be redirected somewhere positive, otherwise people wouldn't bother. Clearly we already know better than to let ourselves be completely stripped of our identities... or we wouldn't even be having this discussion =) We wouldn't have the means if we didn't have the means.

Think for yourself

This is a thought provoking post and unfortunately you are right. The best education is to absorb knowledge by any means necessary, trust in your instincts, do unto others as you'd like done to yourself and disobey tyranny at all costs! Namaste!

visit:  Visionary Psychedelic Surrealism by Myztico     www.myztico.mosaicglobe.com 

College did its job

For me, college did its job. I went in an arrogant, know-it-all fundamentalist and left a slightly more humble non-fundamentalist. At the very least I gained a small appreciation of the vast number of things I didn't know. (Unfortunately, it didn't work for my brother, who is still a know-it-all fundamentalist.)

My impression is that college did its job for you too, Teddy. You understand the limits of what you've been taught, you are aware of what college and society in general are up to, and you're pissed off. Seriously dude, I think you have a bright future ahead of you.

My fervent hope is that you start your own college someday.

Namaste, LH.

I am very happy this

I am very happy this discussion exists.

I share many of the views you have expressed regarding our education system and society in general. I also agree they are not completely bad.

What we need to do is help change or eliminate what isn't working, but keep the parts that are.

I believe the point of education is to nurture a desire for balanced personal growth, as well as teach skills for taking control of one's own personal growth.

When the education system no longer inspires growth, maybe it should be reformed. But where to begin?

Universal University

I think an under lying point to the original post is that until we transcend all of the obsolete relativistic and deterministic methods of experiment and understanding, there will forever be a pinprick in the proverbial "seat of learning"

So much of our so called psychology and science has proven itself wrong only after riding the wave of so-called knowledge for a period ... at relatively great expense.

Virtually all planetary atmospheric destruction has come from the most educated branches of humanity.

When will the Universities only teach actual universal truth ... no longer subject to it's own fancy ... but true for all beings, in all places, at all times.

How else will any true student of life become satisfied.

Quantum Science has us on the brink of finally transcending such relativity ... yet there is as much resistance within academia, if not more than outside of academia in relation to such possibility.

The best students make the best teachers ... yet if what is being taught remains limited to it's own relativity ... how deeply satisfying will such learning actually be to the very spirit of inspiration.

Fantastic article. Yes to

Fantastic article. Yes to everything.

I've been saying for a while now, to anyone who'll listen (whilst pursuing my own master's degree, hypocrite that I am, but hey at least I'm getting paid this time) that higher education has mostly become our society's way of keeping the youngest, most energetic, unpredictable and creative segment of the population occupied with busy-work instead of getting up to anything that might upset the established order or progression of things. Certainly it's not performed teach them anything really useful, enlightening, or profound. Quite the opposite.

Frank Zappa said something about if you want an education, library cards are free. That's always been my take. Sure I've been involved with school nearly my whole life, and I've generally done very well, but you know what? It's always been almost incidental to me in terms of what I was actually learning, The real education was what happened outside the class-room. I've been in school mainly because ... that's what young people do, in this society, especially if you're deemed smart. It isn't always fun but it's where the other smart ones are.

Or so you'd think. The truth is you have to look hard for real vision and awareness ... but that's always the case, wherever you are. I guess what I'm saying is I'd rather be here than anywhere else and wherever I might go from here will be exactly where I want to be, too.

The Revolution is Within

I'd say it's more like the

I'd say it's more like the Catholic Church of our time, mixed with bad people and good people, all "doing the good work". It would seem in some instances that an institution of higher learning is another group of fancy brick buildings with white-haried men in glasses telling you what you have to think.

But they might not try to kill you. We hope.

“An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come.”-Victor Hugo

Syndicate content

"Banish the word 'struggle' from your attitude and your vocabulary. All that we do now must be done in a sacred manner and in celebration. We are the ones we have been waiting for." — Hopi elders

Sponsored by