Crossing the Event Horizon: Our Dialogue with the Cosmos
- Login or register to post comments
- Print this page
In a comment following Daniel Pinchbeck’s essay, The Big Takeover , he brought my attention to Nassim Haramein, a Swiss self-trained, self-styled scientist and theorist:
In this sense, what has happened up to this point is a kind of overlapping other or next dimension that is merging with ours perhaps, but is not quite in phase with us yet
(Pinchbeck. Essay Comment, March 27, 2009).In Haramein’s two hour video presentation, Crossing the Event Horizon, (Note: it takes a few moments to load while only a black screen is visible) one of the concepts he points out is how we can interact and influence our reality through participation –– that we are the resistors in a feedback loop within Reality, a sort of electronic resistor, our influence in our world and Reality limited only by our capacity to conduct, or pass through, energy and information as we encounter it.
We’re involved, to the degree we’re aware and able to participate, by the amount we’re able to feed back into The System –– directly related to amount of information that can come into ourselves as resistors. The more we can open ourselves up to receive and be aware of, the more we can offer up an interactive dialogue with the Universe in all its dimensions. The Universe is an interactive constantly changing system.
Personal, spiritual, esoteric initiations of growth dissolve boundaries and increase or expand our awareness –– and thus that capacity to offer our feed back as influence in an ever changing and growing Universe.
In Richard Tarnas’ Cosmos and the Psyche he suggests:
So if we can work toward openness and vulnerability . . . trust . . . in our participation in Life and our dialogue with not only others, but in our ongoing understanding and perceptions of our dialogue with our entire sense of Reality –– while we work on right motives –– we can be positive influences for change. Tarnas goes on to say:
And so as we participate in our interactions and dialoguing –– in the expansion of our capacity and influence –– let it be that we come from compassion, love, healing and growth in our union with The Great Experiment.
For another fantastic read on communing with this space of nonordinary reality, and Sacred Mind, as Christopher Bache terms it, I recommend Bache's book, Dark Night, Early Dawn - Steps to a Deep Ecology of Mind , where Bache so vulnerably, honestly and authentically shares both his own intimate experiences in his sessions in nonordinary consciousness with Sacred Mind, as well as those of other subjects' sessions in his investigations.
Thanks to alicepopkorn for creative image used under Creative Commons License.
Comments
I came across Haramein's
I came across Haramein's work not too long ago myself. Very intriguing stuff, a lot to take in at once with all those hours of lectures he's got up there but he certainly brings a fresh perspective to physics that had me looking at everything very differently for a while.
One thing that sort of jumped out at me was his use of white hole/black hole dynamics to explain everything atoms, galaxies, and everything in between. I found this particularly interesting in light of my research into the 'electric universe' theory, an alternative cosmology that explains most of the phenomena we observe in the universe perfectly satisfactorily, but without invoking black holes at all (in fact, most of the theory's proponents see black holes as being the modern equivalent of Ptolemaic epicycles: theoretical kludges put in place to mask the shortcomings of a faulty model, in this case one that relies exclusively on gravity.)
Now, I'm not saying the electric universe proponents are right and Haramein's whole work (or at least, that part of it based on black holes, which is quite a bit) is thus called into question. It's pretty clear, at least to my reading, that when he says 'black hole' he's not using the term necessarily in the standard way. Really what he's describing is a whole new theory of matter, a mathematics of consciousness that applies at all scales. Right or wrong it's fascinating stuff.
Love Harremein
Certainly Harremein's model holds true even in the noosphere. There is, within me, a point to which all perception goes, and simultaneously new action and information arises from that Perceiver.
Black Whole/White Whole (Harremein always uses the word Whole, not Hole. You have to see it written to know that, though).
"You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world."
Mahatma Gandhi

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket

