Self-Aware Science: Evolution is Intentional (Revised)
- Login or register to post comments
- Print this page
- I have hitherto sometimes spoken as if the variations [...] had been due to chance. This, of course, is a wholly incorrect expression, but it serves to acknowledge plainly our ignorance of the cause of each particular variation.
-
—Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species
Materialism is the philosophy of the subject who forgets to take account of himself.
—Arthur Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation
The standard view of evolution says that evolution is random, that life is accidental, and that nature has no purpose. But what about its purpose, its goal, its intent?
Science is surely searching for something, and is it not also of nature?
Materialism is unable to form a coherent picture of the world because it ignores that there is something forming pictures of the world: it lacks a useful understanding of Man because it ignores Man's thirsting for understanding.
Materialism fails because it is blind unto itself. It falls for the illusion and chases idols on top of idols in eternal return. So we get a knowledge with no meaning, a culture with no purpose, and a world with no light.
For it is by no quantum probability, special relativity, weak force, strong force, genetic drift or chemical reaction that you are reading this piece. It is because you want to that you are reading this.
The Will exists.
It is real, palpable, and whether "free" or not, the Will is a part of nature. Yet is not visible or touchable. It is beneath and beyond the physical spectrum of experience—a non-visible force, a meta-physical natural phenomenon.
And it is observable.
It is the snail slithering up the tree. The tree digging down through the Earth. It is the orchid opening up. The infant learning how to walk. It is our getting up in the morning, and it is you reading this sentence.
But because it is not visible, touchable, or measurable, the Will does not exist for the materialist world-view. And you will not see this in a scientific journal because it is the blind-spot of contemporary science; its yearned-for substratum; its buried keystone.
What kind of world-picture leaves out the world-creating force?
An innocent one, a naïve mentality, one that is not yet self-aware.
But we are self-aware, and evolution continues.
So as we see beneath the surface and embrace the Will to live into our understanding of the organism, then let us see that Life and evolution are not all that accidental, coincidental, random, etc.—No, we are nature. The universe is intelligent. Reality is organic. And evolution is intentional.
"But what is this purpose?" you might ask. And the answer to that question can only be found inside of you.
The end, the goal, the finality of evolution is nothing physical (larger bodies, faster running, higher jumping, etc.)—which is why materialism sees it not.
The purpose is pre-physical. Biological evolution is something like the adaptation of mind; the calibration of consciousness; the unfolding of awareness; the unraveling of existence.
The self-creation of the world.
The inner, embodied world.
And it is more trial and error than it is random mutation. For how random is science? Did Einstein randomly come up with his great theory, Darwin accidentally write On the Origin of Species, and Copernicus un-intentionally put the Sun at the center of his system?
No, science is the search for truth; the exploration of experience; the intentional proliferation and natural selection of mental adaptations.
The cross-pollination of ideas; the free market of mentalities; the natural selection of belief systems.
The gradual perfection of the walking universe.
And a perfect microcosm for evolution: the natural progression towards ever more conclusive living drafts of this embodied world.
So when people have a problem with the materialist conception of evolution, it is with good reason: when researchers and educators claim that life is accidental and purposeless, they are imparting plain ignorance (in the words of Darwin)—ignorance served as science.
Fortunately, creation continues, and science evolves.
Are we ready to embrace intention, purpose, responsibility?
Does science dare uncover itself?
Comments
I always found it
I always found it interesting that most of the most prominent voices in science were themselves spiritual (Newton and Einstein being a couple). Sometimes it bothers me when people tell me that science and spirituality can't coexist because eventually they will prove the other is true.
Science and spirituality
The Ancient Egyptians could not have one without the other. We call it now "sacred science". It made more sense to me. Gods among the stars. That we can become the Gods too and follow along the path, with the right knowledge and understanding. Materialistic culture and understanding has really made human existence out to be unimaginative and short-lived. I would like the biggie-sized version of humanity, please. I want to fly among the stars now, and after I leave this body.
I had a vision,...
...or maybe just a hope, that reincarnation is true. If you don't learn the lessons you were here on Earth for, you come back. When you learn the lessons of the physical realm and pass the test, you pass into the next level where your consciousness is merged with a new galaxy and you then are basically the God. Maybe I'll bump into you out there.
Neat huh? That'll be $10...*flunk* "ribbit...dang! Where's that snake"
Live well, be free
zimij
The Will to Intend
"Why" is originally an expression ... "why the flower is so beautiful" ... and not an instigation ... "why is the flower flowering"
To "see" life as an already "self-intending" ... "self-expressive" interactive reality seems to be an actual "plateau of understanding" that enlightened, yogic, religious and entheogenic persons gain actual "revelation" of at some point.
If one does not or cannot "evolve" or "advance" ones actual awareness to reach such a plateau/ state .. then the sub-cosmic laws of "relativity" are all thats left.
Not that all so-called religious persons have actual revelation .. or that anyone who entrains with an entheogenic substance actually becomes "mystical" ..
... well those that do all seem to agree .. and all those who don 't all seem to agree on the basic perspective with which to view nature/life.
Every time period of social interaction produces those of actual revelation to different degrees .. from different perspectives .. in spite of any/all relativistic interpretation.
Many so-called scholars and/or general thinking persons often find it hard to believe in a God who allows/creates suffering of any kind .. even many a religious person has lost their faith due to such apparent conflict.
Yet most religious doctrines speaks of duality, karma .. fruits of Good and Evil interpretations themselves as the very leaving of Eden ... that to remain in revelation to an absolute source, God ... that one must consciously transcend the self-perpetuating dualistic descriptions of the infinite interactions of life.
Such is never determined by belief .. or undermined by dis-belief. Faith being different from belief in that some sense of "conscious revelation" is now there .. again some actual awareness beyond interpretation.
... how ever it comes .. when it does there is general agreement in such a shared state ... when such doesn't come there is also general agreement ... as is relatively easy to see among people of the world.
As "science" has advanced over the centuries into the more "Quantum perspectives" .. well all measurement itself, the very key to the empirical methodology is now seen to be nothing more than the quantum flux of the subjective observer themselves ... {wave / particle etc}
Again returning the actual experience of truth to the "conscious revelation" of trans-relativity for those who can actual advance to such a plateau.
The literal definition of the term "proof" means only to "please oneself with interpretation .. with measurement" .. there never being any "fact" that determines anything outside of relativistic measurement .. forever only answering it's own self-created, self-perpetuating questioning.
The Quantum plateau of the advancing relativistic mind set has finally made this painstakingly available to all those of such empirical bent.
Faith in Science ... & the Science of Faith ... relativity .. or revelation ..
One only proves ... {pleases with measurement/hence judgment} ... {leaves Eden} ... to the degree "Tree of Life" revelation is not consciously present as already transcendental to interpretive comparison.
Intent is the key
Yes indeed, Just as in info processing, random equals error. Every process leads to an intended outcome. At the very least, every living thing intends to grow and reproduce.
Good post... keep it up! =-)

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket



