Peace through conflict
- Login or register to post comments
- Print this page
When one takes a step back, and looks at our planet from a current, and historical perspective, it is pretty hard not to make the assumption that we live on a "war planet." No matter how diligent we are at making peace, conflict breaks out somewhere, somehow.
This being the case, it would be logical that one should look to the cause of our need to possess and impress, and find the root of our “need” to fight. What is the cause of this need to control and possess others? Where do our selfish desires, motivations and agendas come from? Most simply, they come from the ego self, or our identification as “me.”
From what we tend to find through study and research, taking the fight to the cause of our plight and ‘attacking” the ego, seems to be the fastest, surest, most no frills way to peace. If it is indeed the ego, that is the cause and vehicle that amplifies our instinctual needs, then only by rewiring the way we think, releases us from its selfish grip.
If one is to take a moment and ponder the above, would it not be reasonable then to consider, that perhaps the martial arts are a most valid path to peace? How else could one learn to "conquer" the ego self? Does not conquer, vanquish, and overcome fit the very theme in which we live?
We should also consider the logic presented to us from the dualistic state in which we live. Does one not seek warmth when cold, or dry when wet, or food when hungry? To fully realize an experience for what it is, we must have the knowledge of its opposite. If one is able to see the logic of the argument above, then could it be seen that seeking peace, without first experiencing the strife of "conquering" the ego self, is just avoiding the unavoidable?
If one is to look at all the evidence logically, it seems that finding the balance between selfishness and selflessness leads to a unity of the self, and finally peace. After all, has it not been said that, "all things worthwhile flow from peace,” and how best to know peace, then by first knowing strife?
Comments
Ego
You said: "If it is indeed the ego, that is the cause and vehicle that amplifies our instinctual needs, then only by rewiring the way we think, releases us from its selfish grip."
You present a fine case when you say that the way to peace is first through strife, which I hear you to mean that the ego must be conquered. I agree with this. But I am not sure if your idea and my idea of what the ego is are the same thing. Can you tell me what you mean by ego...i.e. in your words what is the ego? And what is left after it is conquered?
hmmmm
It takes two egos to tango. Is it disagreements that escalate into war or the all inclusive "in our national interest" that causes most of this. In the later the strong dominate the weak. Is it ego or failures to resolve conflicts that is to blame? Or perhaps more fundamentally one sides lack of fairness or has internal interests that are a possible cause. A man/woman/child without an ego might be a non-human. As has been said, it depends on how you define ego.
just making points here.
(edit) "not" was stuck from the second sentence before disagreements.
Hmm, describe myself without
Hmm, describe myself without using I, me or mine. I see, I am who i think I am, that is the ego. I agree.
But what then is the newly born child who knows no words, has no word thoughts or concepts, beliefs or indoctrinations yet? He is human but an unconditioned human? He lives yet has no sense of self, no ego. I would argue the he is simply quiet awareness. He is that which looks out from behind the eyes of the newborn. And this unadulterated awareness is our truest identity and the state we all unconsciously yearn to return to. It is a place of stillness, of no thought. It is that which is common to all before worldly conditioning creates artificial separation in and between us. I would also argue that if everyone were to drop this conditioned sense of self and return to innocence, to the pure aware state we were initially born with, there would be heaven on earth and the end of all conflict.
The child is all me, self, ego
This is well known. Only through the development of the higher self can others be considered. The self has to be taught to "let go". The infant has but one purpose, to get its needs met. This is function is instinctual, hard wired and necessary for the infants survival perhaps for mankind's survival.
I believe you will find
that in the end you may come to two conclusions. That to neutralize ego you will need two states, one being humility and the other selflessness. Both in actually center in the very thing, ego, they are intended to neutralize. Humility having three forms: submissiveness, self without pride and arrogance, and the last self as equal. The final form being the better for it insures survival. Selflessness also requires ego for it requires choices that can and do require a form of righteousness in dealing with others. Righteousness meaning that right becomes couples with emotion as disdain for that which is not right.
The answer is not found in ego. It is found in Power, metaphysical Power to transform the world. Miraculous Power to transform man without effort or struggle. Seek this Power and the world will change and there will be peace without conflict. This power is neither love nor light for it is unknowable and has no definition yet exists. It is the sum total of all spiritual gifts given to man and the universe.
In the moments of battle
one processed with the totality of one's self.
one mind yet no mind. (The pardox)
This is zen.
Harbinger nods
Bushido
If you are far from the enemy, make him believe you are near.
Sun Tzu
All warfare is based on deception.
Sun Tzu
Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent's fate.
Sun Tzu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQooui1eRhw&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqtbIC5lKfc&feature=related
For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.
Sun Tzu
Read more: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/s/sun_tzu.html#ixzz1ITzJyBSY

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket


